Legal and regulatory barriers to effective public-private partnership governance in Kazakhstan

Nikolai Mouraviev, Nada K. Kakabadse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)
87 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: The article aims to provide a critical assessment of legal and regulatory impediments to effective governance of public-private partnerships (PPPs) in Kazakhstan.

Design/methodology/approach: The qualitative study develops propositions from the PPP literature and then tests them against findings from in-depth interviews. Interviewees have been selected by a purposeful sampling from PPP projects in Kazakhstan as well as from national and regional PPP centres.

Findings: The identified barriers to effective PPP management include irregularities in the PPP legal framework, such as lack of legal definition of a PPP and controversy with the government guarantee’s legal status for its long-term payments to partnerships; bureaucratic tariff setting for partnership services; non-existent opportunity for private asset ownership; and excessive government regulation of PPP workers' wage rates.

Practical implications: The partners' opposing perspectives on a number of PPP issues show that management needs to identify and carefully reconcile stakeholder values in a partnership in order to achieve more effective PPP governance. Practitioners, particularly those in the public agencies, have to be concerned with ways to reduce the government overregulation of the private operators, which is likely to result in greater PPP flexibility in management and, ultimately, higher efficiency in delivering the public services.

Originality/value: By elucidating multiple examples of overregulation and PPPs' inefficiency, the article demonstrates that the government dominance in PPP management is conceptually inappropriate. Instead, the government should adopt the concept of co-production and manage its relations with the private sector partner in a collaborative fashion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)181-197
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Public Sector Management
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Kazakhstan
public private partnership
governance
management
coproduction
legal status
public service
Values
guarantee
wage
private sector
assets
flexibility

Cite this

@article{9da72acab1e545bdbd2497b2c1887db6,
title = "Legal and regulatory barriers to effective public-private partnership governance in Kazakhstan",
abstract = "Purpose: The article aims to provide a critical assessment of legal and regulatory impediments to effective governance of public-private partnerships (PPPs) in Kazakhstan.Design/methodology/approach: The qualitative study develops propositions from the PPP literature and then tests them against findings from in-depth interviews. Interviewees have been selected by a purposeful sampling from PPP projects in Kazakhstan as well as from national and regional PPP centres.Findings: The identified barriers to effective PPP management include irregularities in the PPP legal framework, such as lack of legal definition of a PPP and controversy with the government guarantee’s legal status for its long-term payments to partnerships; bureaucratic tariff setting for partnership services; non-existent opportunity for private asset ownership; and excessive government regulation of PPP workers' wage rates.Practical implications: The partners' opposing perspectives on a number of PPP issues show that management needs to identify and carefully reconcile stakeholder values in a partnership in order to achieve more effective PPP governance. Practitioners, particularly those in the public agencies, have to be concerned with ways to reduce the government overregulation of the private operators, which is likely to result in greater PPP flexibility in management and, ultimately, higher efficiency in delivering the public services.Originality/value: By elucidating multiple examples of overregulation and PPPs' inefficiency, the article demonstrates that the government dominance in PPP management is conceptually inappropriate. Instead, the government should adopt the concept of co-production and manage its relations with the private sector partner in a collaborative fashion.",
author = "Nikolai Mouraviev and Kakabadse, {Nada K.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1108/IJPSM-09-2014-0116",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "181--197",
journal = "International Journal of Public Sector Management",
number = "3",

}

Legal and regulatory barriers to effective public-private partnership governance in Kazakhstan. / Mouraviev, Nikolai; Kakabadse, Nada K.

In: International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2015, p. 181-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legal and regulatory barriers to effective public-private partnership governance in Kazakhstan

AU - Mouraviev, Nikolai

AU - Kakabadse, Nada K.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Purpose: The article aims to provide a critical assessment of legal and regulatory impediments to effective governance of public-private partnerships (PPPs) in Kazakhstan.Design/methodology/approach: The qualitative study develops propositions from the PPP literature and then tests them against findings from in-depth interviews. Interviewees have been selected by a purposeful sampling from PPP projects in Kazakhstan as well as from national and regional PPP centres.Findings: The identified barriers to effective PPP management include irregularities in the PPP legal framework, such as lack of legal definition of a PPP and controversy with the government guarantee’s legal status for its long-term payments to partnerships; bureaucratic tariff setting for partnership services; non-existent opportunity for private asset ownership; and excessive government regulation of PPP workers' wage rates.Practical implications: The partners' opposing perspectives on a number of PPP issues show that management needs to identify and carefully reconcile stakeholder values in a partnership in order to achieve more effective PPP governance. Practitioners, particularly those in the public agencies, have to be concerned with ways to reduce the government overregulation of the private operators, which is likely to result in greater PPP flexibility in management and, ultimately, higher efficiency in delivering the public services.Originality/value: By elucidating multiple examples of overregulation and PPPs' inefficiency, the article demonstrates that the government dominance in PPP management is conceptually inappropriate. Instead, the government should adopt the concept of co-production and manage its relations with the private sector partner in a collaborative fashion.

AB - Purpose: The article aims to provide a critical assessment of legal and regulatory impediments to effective governance of public-private partnerships (PPPs) in Kazakhstan.Design/methodology/approach: The qualitative study develops propositions from the PPP literature and then tests them against findings from in-depth interviews. Interviewees have been selected by a purposeful sampling from PPP projects in Kazakhstan as well as from national and regional PPP centres.Findings: The identified barriers to effective PPP management include irregularities in the PPP legal framework, such as lack of legal definition of a PPP and controversy with the government guarantee’s legal status for its long-term payments to partnerships; bureaucratic tariff setting for partnership services; non-existent opportunity for private asset ownership; and excessive government regulation of PPP workers' wage rates.Practical implications: The partners' opposing perspectives on a number of PPP issues show that management needs to identify and carefully reconcile stakeholder values in a partnership in order to achieve more effective PPP governance. Practitioners, particularly those in the public agencies, have to be concerned with ways to reduce the government overregulation of the private operators, which is likely to result in greater PPP flexibility in management and, ultimately, higher efficiency in delivering the public services.Originality/value: By elucidating multiple examples of overregulation and PPPs' inefficiency, the article demonstrates that the government dominance in PPP management is conceptually inappropriate. Instead, the government should adopt the concept of co-production and manage its relations with the private sector partner in a collaborative fashion.

U2 - 10.1108/IJPSM-09-2014-0116

DO - 10.1108/IJPSM-09-2014-0116

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 181

EP - 197

JO - International Journal of Public Sector Management

JF - International Journal of Public Sector Management

IS - 3

ER -