Lexical and phonological effects on syntactic processing

evidence from syntactic priming

Mikel Santesteban, Martin J. Pickering, Janet F. McLean

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated whether phonological relationships at the lexical level affect syntactic encoding during sentence production. Cleland and Pickering (2003) showed that syntactic priming effects are enhanced by semantic, but not phonological relations between lexical items, suggesting that there are no effects of phonology on syntactic encoding. Here we report four experiments investigating the influence of homophones on syntactic priming. When describing the picture of a flying bat, Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that people tended to produce relative-clauses such as the bat that’s red (instead of the red bat) more often after hearing the bat that’s red (referring to a cricket bat), than after the pool that’s red. Experiments 3 and 4 revealed that mediated homophone–semantic relations between lexical items (e.g., flying bat–racket) do not enhance syntactic priming. We interpret these results in terms of theories of syntactic encoding.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)347-366
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume63
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2010

Fingerprint

Syntactics
experiment
Processing
evidence
phonology
Gryllidae
semantics
Semantics
Experiments
Hearing
Audition
Experiment
Syntax
Syntactic Priming
Syntactic Processing
Encoding
Lexical Item

Cite this

@article{566ef2737e2b49fb9ec360f6bd7e4910,
title = "Lexical and phonological effects on syntactic processing: evidence from syntactic priming",
abstract = "We investigated whether phonological relationships at the lexical level affect syntactic encoding during sentence production. Cleland and Pickering (2003) showed that syntactic priming effects are enhanced by semantic, but not phonological relations between lexical items, suggesting that there are no effects of phonology on syntactic encoding. Here we report four experiments investigating the influence of homophones on syntactic priming. When describing the picture of a flying bat, Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that people tended to produce relative-clauses such as the bat that’s red (instead of the red bat) more often after hearing the bat that’s red (referring to a cricket bat), than after the pool that’s red. Experiments 3 and 4 revealed that mediated homophone–semantic relations between lexical items (e.g., flying bat–racket) do not enhance syntactic priming. We interpret these results in terms of theories of syntactic encoding.",
author = "Mikel Santesteban and Pickering, {Martin J.} and McLean, {Janet F.}",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.jml.2010.07.001",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "347--366",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Lexical and phonological effects on syntactic processing : evidence from syntactic priming. / Santesteban, Mikel; Pickering, Martin J.; McLean, Janet F.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 63, No. 3, 10.2010, p. 347-366.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lexical and phonological effects on syntactic processing

T2 - evidence from syntactic priming

AU - Santesteban, Mikel

AU - Pickering, Martin J.

AU - McLean, Janet F.

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - We investigated whether phonological relationships at the lexical level affect syntactic encoding during sentence production. Cleland and Pickering (2003) showed that syntactic priming effects are enhanced by semantic, but not phonological relations between lexical items, suggesting that there are no effects of phonology on syntactic encoding. Here we report four experiments investigating the influence of homophones on syntactic priming. When describing the picture of a flying bat, Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that people tended to produce relative-clauses such as the bat that’s red (instead of the red bat) more often after hearing the bat that’s red (referring to a cricket bat), than after the pool that’s red. Experiments 3 and 4 revealed that mediated homophone–semantic relations between lexical items (e.g., flying bat–racket) do not enhance syntactic priming. We interpret these results in terms of theories of syntactic encoding.

AB - We investigated whether phonological relationships at the lexical level affect syntactic encoding during sentence production. Cleland and Pickering (2003) showed that syntactic priming effects are enhanced by semantic, but not phonological relations between lexical items, suggesting that there are no effects of phonology on syntactic encoding. Here we report four experiments investigating the influence of homophones on syntactic priming. When describing the picture of a flying bat, Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that people tended to produce relative-clauses such as the bat that’s red (instead of the red bat) more often after hearing the bat that’s red (referring to a cricket bat), than after the pool that’s red. Experiments 3 and 4 revealed that mediated homophone–semantic relations between lexical items (e.g., flying bat–racket) do not enhance syntactic priming. We interpret these results in terms of theories of syntactic encoding.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2010.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2010.07.001

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 347

EP - 366

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

IS - 3

ER -