TY - JOUR
T1 - Listen to yourself! Prioritization of self-associated and own voice cues
AU - Kirk, Neil W.
AU - Cunningham, Sheila J.
N1 - © 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Psycholog y published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The British Psychological Society.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Data availability statement:
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Open Science Framework at
https:// osf. io/ hr96d/ , reference number DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/HR96D.
PY - 2025/2/1
Y1 - 2025/2/1
N2 - Self‐cues such as one's own name or face attract attention, reflecting a bias for stimuli connected to self to be prioritized in cognition. Recent evidence suggests that even external voices can elicit this self‐prioritization effect; in a voice‐label matching task, external voices assigned to the Self‐identity label ‘you’ elicited faster responses than those assigned to ‘friend’ or ‘stranger’ (Payne et al., Br. J. Psychology, 112, 585‐610). However, it is not clear whether external voices assigned to Self are prioritized over participants' own voices. We explore this issue in two experiments. In Exp 1 (N = 35), a voice‐label matching task comprising three external voices confirmed that reaction time and accuracy are improved when an external voice cue is assigned to Self rather than Friend or Stranger. In Exp 2 (N = 90), one of the voice cues was replaced with a recording of the participant's own voice. Reaction time and accuracy showed a consistent advantage for the participant's own‐voice, even when it was assigned to the ‘friend’ or ‘stranger’ identity. These findings show that external voices can elicit self‐prioritization effects if associated with Self, but they are not prioritized above individuals' own voices. This has implications for external voice production technology, suggesting own‐voice imitation may be beneficial.
AB - Self‐cues such as one's own name or face attract attention, reflecting a bias for stimuli connected to self to be prioritized in cognition. Recent evidence suggests that even external voices can elicit this self‐prioritization effect; in a voice‐label matching task, external voices assigned to the Self‐identity label ‘you’ elicited faster responses than those assigned to ‘friend’ or ‘stranger’ (Payne et al., Br. J. Psychology, 112, 585‐610). However, it is not clear whether external voices assigned to Self are prioritized over participants' own voices. We explore this issue in two experiments. In Exp 1 (N = 35), a voice‐label matching task comprising three external voices confirmed that reaction time and accuracy are improved when an external voice cue is assigned to Self rather than Friend or Stranger. In Exp 2 (N = 90), one of the voice cues was replaced with a recording of the participant's own voice. Reaction time and accuracy showed a consistent advantage for the participant's own‐voice, even when it was assigned to the ‘friend’ or ‘stranger’ identity. These findings show that external voices can elicit self‐prioritization effects if associated with Self, but they are not prioritized above individuals' own voices. This has implications for external voice production technology, suggesting own‐voice imitation may be beneficial.
U2 - 10.1111/bjop.12741
DO - 10.1111/bjop.12741
M3 - Article
SN - 0007-1269
VL - 116
SP - 131
EP - 148
JO - British Journal of Psychology
JF - British Journal of Psychology
IS - 1
ER -