Management as negotiation at the interface: moving beyond the critical—practice impasse

Sabine Hotho, David Pollard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 10 Citations

Abstract

The seemingly marginal contribution of management theory to management practice has been commented on in different contexts. Specifically, critical management studies (CMS) seems suspended in an impasse between the aim to critique dominant management practice and discourse, and the expectation to facilitate transformative management action. This paper argues that the theory—practice impasse may, in part, be a result of reductivist perspectives discursively produced by both mainstream and critical management studies. To illustrate this argument, the paper refers to a case study exploring middle management practice in the higher education context. It demonstrates that academic middle management practice as constructed by polarized and polarizing discourses of either managerial or critical orientation is counterproductive to a full understanding of this practice and the contribution it can make to organizations if properly understood, and proposes an alternative reading aimed to `cross the divide' between discourses and between theory and practice. It is proposed that a more constructive engagement with multiple rationalities can move towards a more comprehensive understanding of currently marginalized management activity, and, from there, towards a more productive link between theory and practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)583-603
Number of pages21
JournalOrganization
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Management activities
Rationality
Practice theory
Education

Cite this

Hotho, Sabine; Pollard, David / Management as negotiation at the interface : moving beyond the critical—practice impasse.

In: Organization, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2007, p. 583-603.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{90cbb6ac90bf4b42b299f0ca7011068d,
title = "Management as negotiation at the interface: moving beyond the critical—practice impasse",
abstract = "The seemingly marginal contribution of management theory to management practice has been commented on in different contexts. Specifically, critical management studies (CMS) seems suspended in an impasse between the aim to critique dominant management practice and discourse, and the expectation to facilitate transformative management action. This paper argues that the theory—practice impasse may, in part, be a result of reductivist perspectives discursively produced by both mainstream and critical management studies. To illustrate this argument, the paper refers to a case study exploring middle management practice in the higher education context. It demonstrates that academic middle management practice as constructed by polarized and polarizing discourses of either managerial or critical orientation is counterproductive to a full understanding of this practice and the contribution it can make to organizations if properly understood, and proposes an alternative reading aimed to `cross the divide' between discourses and between theory and practice. It is proposed that a more constructive engagement with multiple rationalities can move towards a more comprehensive understanding of currently marginalized management activity, and, from there, towards a more productive link between theory and practice.",
author = "Sabine Hotho and David Pollard",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1177/1350508407078768",
volume = "14",
pages = "583--603",
journal = "Organization",
issn = "1350-5084",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Management as negotiation at the interface : moving beyond the critical—practice impasse. / Hotho, Sabine; Pollard, David.

In: Organization, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2007, p. 583-603.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management as negotiation at the interface

T2 - Organization

AU - Hotho,Sabine

AU - Pollard,David

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The seemingly marginal contribution of management theory to management practice has been commented on in different contexts. Specifically, critical management studies (CMS) seems suspended in an impasse between the aim to critique dominant management practice and discourse, and the expectation to facilitate transformative management action. This paper argues that the theory—practice impasse may, in part, be a result of reductivist perspectives discursively produced by both mainstream and critical management studies. To illustrate this argument, the paper refers to a case study exploring middle management practice in the higher education context. It demonstrates that academic middle management practice as constructed by polarized and polarizing discourses of either managerial or critical orientation is counterproductive to a full understanding of this practice and the contribution it can make to organizations if properly understood, and proposes an alternative reading aimed to `cross the divide' between discourses and between theory and practice. It is proposed that a more constructive engagement with multiple rationalities can move towards a more comprehensive understanding of currently marginalized management activity, and, from there, towards a more productive link between theory and practice.

AB - The seemingly marginal contribution of management theory to management practice has been commented on in different contexts. Specifically, critical management studies (CMS) seems suspended in an impasse between the aim to critique dominant management practice and discourse, and the expectation to facilitate transformative management action. This paper argues that the theory—practice impasse may, in part, be a result of reductivist perspectives discursively produced by both mainstream and critical management studies. To illustrate this argument, the paper refers to a case study exploring middle management practice in the higher education context. It demonstrates that academic middle management practice as constructed by polarized and polarizing discourses of either managerial or critical orientation is counterproductive to a full understanding of this practice and the contribution it can make to organizations if properly understood, and proposes an alternative reading aimed to `cross the divide' between discourses and between theory and practice. It is proposed that a more constructive engagement with multiple rationalities can move towards a more comprehensive understanding of currently marginalized management activity, and, from there, towards a more productive link between theory and practice.

U2 - 10.1177/1350508407078768

DO - 10.1177/1350508407078768

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 583

EP - 603

JO - Organization

JF - Organization

SN - 1350-5084

IS - 4

ER -