Matching and incorrigibility-reconsideration and proposals

J. R. Grinyer*, R. Kouhy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The apparently arbitrary allocation of many costs in conventional accounting ‘matching’ practice is a long-standing, unresolved and potentially important problem. Thomas (1974) argued that all matching-based allocations are ‘incorrigible’. This paper discusses the issues and proposes modifications to, and interpretations of, current practice that attempt to alleviate the problem. The analysis proposes an incremental development, rather than the introduction of very radical proposals. Consequently it proceeds on the basis of the generally accepted accounting principles of conventional accounting, which may be expected to reflect the perceptions of practitioners and are incorporated in company law.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)309-323
Number of pages15
JournalThe British Accounting Review
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Costs
Company law
Incremental

Cite this

@article{762a7516f9664d9cb2d0a3bd3bff267c,
title = "Matching and incorrigibility-reconsideration and proposals",
abstract = "The apparently arbitrary allocation of many costs in conventional accounting ‘matching’ practice is a long-standing, unresolved and potentially important problem. Thomas (1974) argued that all matching-based allocations are ‘incorrigible’. This paper discusses the issues and proposes modifications to, and interpretations of, current practice that attempt to alleviate the problem. The analysis proposes an incremental development, rather than the introduction of very radical proposals. Consequently it proceeds on the basis of the generally accepted accounting principles of conventional accounting, which may be expected to reflect the perceptions of practitioners and are incorporated in company law.",
author = "Grinyer, {J. R.} and R. Kouhy",
year = "1993",
month = "12",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1006/bare.1993.1031",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "309--323",
journal = "British Accounting Review",
issn = "0890-8389",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Matching and incorrigibility-reconsideration and proposals. / Grinyer, J. R.; Kouhy, R.

In: The British Accounting Review, Vol. 25, No. 4, 31.12.1993, p. 309-323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Matching and incorrigibility-reconsideration and proposals

AU - Grinyer, J. R.

AU - Kouhy, R.

PY - 1993/12/31

Y1 - 1993/12/31

N2 - The apparently arbitrary allocation of many costs in conventional accounting ‘matching’ practice is a long-standing, unresolved and potentially important problem. Thomas (1974) argued that all matching-based allocations are ‘incorrigible’. This paper discusses the issues and proposes modifications to, and interpretations of, current practice that attempt to alleviate the problem. The analysis proposes an incremental development, rather than the introduction of very radical proposals. Consequently it proceeds on the basis of the generally accepted accounting principles of conventional accounting, which may be expected to reflect the perceptions of practitioners and are incorporated in company law.

AB - The apparently arbitrary allocation of many costs in conventional accounting ‘matching’ practice is a long-standing, unresolved and potentially important problem. Thomas (1974) argued that all matching-based allocations are ‘incorrigible’. This paper discusses the issues and proposes modifications to, and interpretations of, current practice that attempt to alleviate the problem. The analysis proposes an incremental development, rather than the introduction of very radical proposals. Consequently it proceeds on the basis of the generally accepted accounting principles of conventional accounting, which may be expected to reflect the perceptions of practitioners and are incorporated in company law.

U2 - 10.1006/bare.1993.1031

DO - 10.1006/bare.1993.1031

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0010123730

VL - 25

SP - 309

EP - 323

JO - British Accounting Review

JF - British Accounting Review

SN - 0890-8389

IS - 4

ER -