Memory conformity: disentangling the steps toward influence during a discussion

Fiona Gabbert, Amina Memon, Daniel B. Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 83 Citations

Abstract

When two people see the same event and discuss it, one person's memory report can influence what the other person subsequently claims to remember. We refer to this as memory conformity. In the present article, two factors underlying the memory conformity effect are investigated. First, are there any characteristics of the dialogue that predict memory conformity? Second, is memory conformity differentially affected when information is encountered that omits, adds to, or contradicts originally encoded items? Participants were tested in pairs. The two members of each pair encoded slightly different versions of complex scenes and discussed them prior to an individual free recall test The discussions were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed. Our most striking finding was that the witness initiating the discussion was most likely to influence the other witness's memory report. Furthermore, witnesses were most likely to be influenced when an additional (previously unseen) item of information was encountered in the discussion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)480-485
Number of pages6
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2006

Fingerprint

Conformity
Witness
Free recall

Cite this

Gabbert, Fiona; Memon, Amina; Wright, Daniel B. / Memory conformity : disentangling the steps toward influence during a discussion.

In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 13, No. 3, 06.2006, p. 480-485.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ec088b0c6d914d238509c27bd1494491,
title = "Memory conformity: disentangling the steps toward influence during a discussion",
abstract = "When two people see the same event and discuss it, one person's memory report can influence what the other person subsequently claims to remember. We refer to this as memory conformity. In the present article, two factors underlying the memory conformity effect are investigated. First, are there any characteristics of the dialogue that predict memory conformity? Second, is memory conformity differentially affected when information is encountered that omits, adds to, or contradicts originally encoded items? Participants were tested in pairs. The two members of each pair encoded slightly different versions of complex scenes and discussed them prior to an individual free recall test The discussions were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed. Our most striking finding was that the witness initiating the discussion was most likely to influence the other witness's memory report. Furthermore, witnesses were most likely to be influenced when an additional (previously unseen) item of information was encountered in the discussion.",
author = "Fiona Gabbert and Amina Memon and Wright, {Daniel B.}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
doi = "10.3758/BF03193873",
volume = "13",
pages = "480--485",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

Memory conformity : disentangling the steps toward influence during a discussion. / Gabbert, Fiona; Memon, Amina; Wright, Daniel B.

In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 13, No. 3, 06.2006, p. 480-485.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Memory conformity

T2 - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

AU - Gabbert,Fiona

AU - Memon,Amina

AU - Wright,Daniel B.

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - When two people see the same event and discuss it, one person's memory report can influence what the other person subsequently claims to remember. We refer to this as memory conformity. In the present article, two factors underlying the memory conformity effect are investigated. First, are there any characteristics of the dialogue that predict memory conformity? Second, is memory conformity differentially affected when information is encountered that omits, adds to, or contradicts originally encoded items? Participants were tested in pairs. The two members of each pair encoded slightly different versions of complex scenes and discussed them prior to an individual free recall test The discussions were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed. Our most striking finding was that the witness initiating the discussion was most likely to influence the other witness's memory report. Furthermore, witnesses were most likely to be influenced when an additional (previously unseen) item of information was encountered in the discussion.

AB - When two people see the same event and discuss it, one person's memory report can influence what the other person subsequently claims to remember. We refer to this as memory conformity. In the present article, two factors underlying the memory conformity effect are investigated. First, are there any characteristics of the dialogue that predict memory conformity? Second, is memory conformity differentially affected when information is encountered that omits, adds to, or contradicts originally encoded items? Participants were tested in pairs. The two members of each pair encoded slightly different versions of complex scenes and discussed them prior to an individual free recall test The discussions were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed. Our most striking finding was that the witness initiating the discussion was most likely to influence the other witness's memory report. Furthermore, witnesses were most likely to be influenced when an additional (previously unseen) item of information was encountered in the discussion.

U2 - 10.3758/BF03193873

DO - 10.3758/BF03193873

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 480

EP - 485

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 3

ER -