Mental object rotation and egocentric body transformation

two dissociable processes?

Corinne Jola, Fred W. Mast

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)
38 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

An important question in studies on mental rotation is whether the mental object rotation and the egocentric body transformation rely on dissociable mechanisms. We tested non-dancers and professional dancers as experts in  the mental object rotation task (MORT, 3D-cubes used by Shepard & Metzler, 1971) and the mental body transformation task (MBRT, line drawings of human bodies similar to those used by Parsons, 1987). The  cubes and body figures were presented in exactly the same rotation conditions; in the picture plane, 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, and 180°, and in combination with a rotation in depth, 0° (the stimuli are rotated in the picture plane only) and 180°. We could replicate the linear increase in RT  with increasing angle for the cubes whereas the RT for rotated body figures  increased for not depth-rotated bodies only (back view). Though, the RTs  for inverted body figures were faster when they were rotated in depth (front view) compared to when they were rotated in the picture plane only (back view). This finding suggests that participants use different strategies depending on the perceived orientation of the stimulus. The results indicate impaired performance in the MORT for the experts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-237
Number of pages21
JournalSpatial Cognition & Computation
Volume5
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Human Body

Cite this

@article{640df87bf5d644c292d5fd63964ee5db,
title = "Mental object rotation and egocentric body transformation: two dissociable processes?",
abstract = "An important question in studies on mental rotation is whether the mental object rotation and the egocentric body transformation rely on dissociable mechanisms. We tested non-dancers and professional dancers as experts in  the mental object rotation task (MORT, 3D-cubes used by Shepard & Metzler, 1971) and the mental body transformation task (MBRT, line drawings of human bodies similar to those used by Parsons, 1987). The  cubes and body figures were presented in exactly the same rotation conditions; in the picture plane, 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, and 180°, and in combination with a rotation in depth, 0° (the stimuli are rotated in the picture plane only) and 180°. We could replicate the linear increase in RT  with increasing angle for the cubes whereas the RT for rotated body figures  increased for not depth-rotated bodies only (back view). Though, the RTs  for inverted body figures were faster when they were rotated in depth (front view) compared to when they were rotated in the picture plane only (back view). This finding suggests that participants use different strategies depending on the perceived orientation of the stimulus. The results indicate impaired performance in the MORT for the experts.",
author = "Corinne Jola and Mast, {Fred W.}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1080/13875868.2005.9683804",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "217--237",
journal = "Spatial Cognition & Computation",
issn = "1542-7633",
number = "2-3",

}

Mental object rotation and egocentric body transformation : two dissociable processes? / Jola, Corinne; Mast, Fred W.

In: Spatial Cognition & Computation, Vol. 5, No. 2-3, 2005, p. 217-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mental object rotation and egocentric body transformation

T2 - two dissociable processes?

AU - Jola, Corinne

AU - Mast, Fred W.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - An important question in studies on mental rotation is whether the mental object rotation and the egocentric body transformation rely on dissociable mechanisms. We tested non-dancers and professional dancers as experts in  the mental object rotation task (MORT, 3D-cubes used by Shepard & Metzler, 1971) and the mental body transformation task (MBRT, line drawings of human bodies similar to those used by Parsons, 1987). The  cubes and body figures were presented in exactly the same rotation conditions; in the picture plane, 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, and 180°, and in combination with a rotation in depth, 0° (the stimuli are rotated in the picture plane only) and 180°. We could replicate the linear increase in RT  with increasing angle for the cubes whereas the RT for rotated body figures  increased for not depth-rotated bodies only (back view). Though, the RTs  for inverted body figures were faster when they were rotated in depth (front view) compared to when they were rotated in the picture plane only (back view). This finding suggests that participants use different strategies depending on the perceived orientation of the stimulus. The results indicate impaired performance in the MORT for the experts.

AB - An important question in studies on mental rotation is whether the mental object rotation and the egocentric body transformation rely on dissociable mechanisms. We tested non-dancers and professional dancers as experts in  the mental object rotation task (MORT, 3D-cubes used by Shepard & Metzler, 1971) and the mental body transformation task (MBRT, line drawings of human bodies similar to those used by Parsons, 1987). The  cubes and body figures were presented in exactly the same rotation conditions; in the picture plane, 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, and 180°, and in combination with a rotation in depth, 0° (the stimuli are rotated in the picture plane only) and 180°. We could replicate the linear increase in RT  with increasing angle for the cubes whereas the RT for rotated body figures  increased for not depth-rotated bodies only (back view). Though, the RTs  for inverted body figures were faster when they were rotated in depth (front view) compared to when they were rotated in the picture plane only (back view). This finding suggests that participants use different strategies depending on the perceived orientation of the stimulus. The results indicate impaired performance in the MORT for the experts.

U2 - 10.1080/13875868.2005.9683804

DO - 10.1080/13875868.2005.9683804

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 217

EP - 237

JO - Spatial Cognition & Computation

JF - Spatial Cognition & Computation

SN - 1542-7633

IS - 2-3

ER -