Monetary valuation of ecosystem services

it matters to get the timeline right

Philippe C. Baveye, Jacques Baveye, John Gowdy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the abundant literature dealing with the monetary valuation, or monetization, of ecosystem services (MES), with very few exceptions, the concept is presented as having emerged in 1997. In fact, there is a long history, starting in the late fifties but largely ignored, of sustained attempts to assign monetary values to nature's services. These early efforts encountered many conceptual and methodological roadblocks, which could not be resolved and led a number of researchers to argue that monetary valuation was not a fruitful approach. It is in that context that MES was hailed by some in 1997 as a promising way to integrate environmental goods and services into the logic of economic markets. Knowledge of the full timeline casts a very different light, in particular on the difficulties currently encountered in the practice of MES; far from being the expected growing pains of a young discipline, these difficulties turn out to be long-standing problems that have eluded solution over the last half-century and appear intrinsically unresolvable. This perspective suggests that, at this point, it is advisable to look at alternatives to MES for the integration of nature into economic decisions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-235
Number of pages5
JournalEcological Economics
Volume95
Early online date28 Sep 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

valuation
ecosystem service
economics
market
Ecosystem services
history
Nature
Economics

Cite this

Baveye, Philippe C. ; Baveye, Jacques ; Gowdy, John. / Monetary valuation of ecosystem services : it matters to get the timeline right. In: Ecological Economics. 2013 ; Vol. 95. pp. 231-235.
@article{5cb918200b1c4e3abf3f494bf10325ff,
title = "Monetary valuation of ecosystem services: it matters to get the timeline right",
abstract = "In the abundant literature dealing with the monetary valuation, or monetization, of ecosystem services (MES), with very few exceptions, the concept is presented as having emerged in 1997. In fact, there is a long history, starting in the late fifties but largely ignored, of sustained attempts to assign monetary values to nature's services. These early efforts encountered many conceptual and methodological roadblocks, which could not be resolved and led a number of researchers to argue that monetary valuation was not a fruitful approach. It is in that context that MES was hailed by some in 1997 as a promising way to integrate environmental goods and services into the logic of economic markets. Knowledge of the full timeline casts a very different light, in particular on the difficulties currently encountered in the practice of MES; far from being the expected growing pains of a young discipline, these difficulties turn out to be long-standing problems that have eluded solution over the last half-century and appear intrinsically unresolvable. This perspective suggests that, at this point, it is advisable to look at alternatives to MES for the integration of nature into economic decisions.",
author = "Baveye, {Philippe C.} and Jacques Baveye and John Gowdy",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.09.009",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "231--235",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Monetary valuation of ecosystem services : it matters to get the timeline right. / Baveye, Philippe C.; Baveye, Jacques; Gowdy, John.

In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 95, 11.2013, p. 231-235.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Monetary valuation of ecosystem services

T2 - it matters to get the timeline right

AU - Baveye, Philippe C.

AU - Baveye, Jacques

AU - Gowdy, John

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - In the abundant literature dealing with the monetary valuation, or monetization, of ecosystem services (MES), with very few exceptions, the concept is presented as having emerged in 1997. In fact, there is a long history, starting in the late fifties but largely ignored, of sustained attempts to assign monetary values to nature's services. These early efforts encountered many conceptual and methodological roadblocks, which could not be resolved and led a number of researchers to argue that monetary valuation was not a fruitful approach. It is in that context that MES was hailed by some in 1997 as a promising way to integrate environmental goods and services into the logic of economic markets. Knowledge of the full timeline casts a very different light, in particular on the difficulties currently encountered in the practice of MES; far from being the expected growing pains of a young discipline, these difficulties turn out to be long-standing problems that have eluded solution over the last half-century and appear intrinsically unresolvable. This perspective suggests that, at this point, it is advisable to look at alternatives to MES for the integration of nature into economic decisions.

AB - In the abundant literature dealing with the monetary valuation, or monetization, of ecosystem services (MES), with very few exceptions, the concept is presented as having emerged in 1997. In fact, there is a long history, starting in the late fifties but largely ignored, of sustained attempts to assign monetary values to nature's services. These early efforts encountered many conceptual and methodological roadblocks, which could not be resolved and led a number of researchers to argue that monetary valuation was not a fruitful approach. It is in that context that MES was hailed by some in 1997 as a promising way to integrate environmental goods and services into the logic of economic markets. Knowledge of the full timeline casts a very different light, in particular on the difficulties currently encountered in the practice of MES; far from being the expected growing pains of a young discipline, these difficulties turn out to be long-standing problems that have eluded solution over the last half-century and appear intrinsically unresolvable. This perspective suggests that, at this point, it is advisable to look at alternatives to MES for the integration of nature into economic decisions.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.09.009

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.09.009

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 231

EP - 235

JO - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

ER -