More is more in language learning

reconsidering the less-is-more hypothesis

Patricia J. Brooks, Vera Kempe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The Less-is-More hypothesis was proposed to explain age-of-acquisition effects in first language (L1) acquisition and second language (L2) attainment. We scrutinize different renditions of the hypothesis by examining how learning outcomes are affected by (1) limited cognitive capacity, (2) reduced interference resulting from less prior knowledge, and (3) simplified language input. While there is little-to-no evidence of benefits of limited cognitive capacity, there is ample support for a More-is-More account linking enhanced capacity with better L1- and L2-learning outcomes, and reduced capacity with childhood language disorders. Instead, reduced prior knowledge (relative to adults) may afford children with greater flexibility in inductive inference; this contradicts the idea that children benefit from a more constrained hypothesis space. Finally, studies of childdirected speech (CDS) confirm benefits from less complex input at early stages, but also emphasize how greater lexical and syntactic complexity of the input confers benefits in L1-attainment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-41
Number of pages29
JournalLanguage Learning
Volume69
Issue numberS1
Early online date17 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

language
learning
child benefit
language acquisition
knowledge
interference
flexibility
childhood
Language Acquisition
evidence
Language
Learning Outcomes
Prior Knowledge
Cognitive Capacity
Inductive Inference
Childhood
L1 Acquisition
L2 Learning
Syntactic Complexity
Interference

Cite this

@article{0849d849957a4b13ba450dd74e3beec4,
title = "More is more in language learning: reconsidering the less-is-more hypothesis",
abstract = "The Less-is-More hypothesis was proposed to explain age-of-acquisition effects in first language (L1) acquisition and second language (L2) attainment. We scrutinize different renditions of the hypothesis by examining how learning outcomes are affected by (1) limited cognitive capacity, (2) reduced interference resulting from less prior knowledge, and (3) simplified language input. While there is little-to-no evidence of benefits of limited cognitive capacity, there is ample support for a More-is-More account linking enhanced capacity with better L1- and L2-learning outcomes, and reduced capacity with childhood language disorders. Instead, reduced prior knowledge (relative to adults) may afford children with greater flexibility in inductive inference; this contradicts the idea that children benefit from a more constrained hypothesis space. Finally, studies of childdirected speech (CDS) confirm benefits from less complex input at early stages, but also emphasize how greater lexical and syntactic complexity of the input confers benefits in L1-attainment.",
author = "Brooks, {Patricia J.} and Vera Kempe",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1111/lang.12320",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "13--41",
journal = "Language Learning",
issn = "0023-8333",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "S1",

}

More is more in language learning : reconsidering the less-is-more hypothesis. / Brooks, Patricia J.; Kempe, Vera.

In: Language Learning, Vol. 69, No. S1, 31.03.2019, p. 13-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - More is more in language learning

T2 - reconsidering the less-is-more hypothesis

AU - Brooks, Patricia J.

AU - Kempe, Vera

PY - 2019/3/31

Y1 - 2019/3/31

N2 - The Less-is-More hypothesis was proposed to explain age-of-acquisition effects in first language (L1) acquisition and second language (L2) attainment. We scrutinize different renditions of the hypothesis by examining how learning outcomes are affected by (1) limited cognitive capacity, (2) reduced interference resulting from less prior knowledge, and (3) simplified language input. While there is little-to-no evidence of benefits of limited cognitive capacity, there is ample support for a More-is-More account linking enhanced capacity with better L1- and L2-learning outcomes, and reduced capacity with childhood language disorders. Instead, reduced prior knowledge (relative to adults) may afford children with greater flexibility in inductive inference; this contradicts the idea that children benefit from a more constrained hypothesis space. Finally, studies of childdirected speech (CDS) confirm benefits from less complex input at early stages, but also emphasize how greater lexical and syntactic complexity of the input confers benefits in L1-attainment.

AB - The Less-is-More hypothesis was proposed to explain age-of-acquisition effects in first language (L1) acquisition and second language (L2) attainment. We scrutinize different renditions of the hypothesis by examining how learning outcomes are affected by (1) limited cognitive capacity, (2) reduced interference resulting from less prior knowledge, and (3) simplified language input. While there is little-to-no evidence of benefits of limited cognitive capacity, there is ample support for a More-is-More account linking enhanced capacity with better L1- and L2-learning outcomes, and reduced capacity with childhood language disorders. Instead, reduced prior knowledge (relative to adults) may afford children with greater flexibility in inductive inference; this contradicts the idea that children benefit from a more constrained hypothesis space. Finally, studies of childdirected speech (CDS) confirm benefits from less complex input at early stages, but also emphasize how greater lexical and syntactic complexity of the input confers benefits in L1-attainment.

U2 - 10.1111/lang.12320

DO - 10.1111/lang.12320

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 13

EP - 41

JO - Language Learning

JF - Language Learning

SN - 0023-8333

IS - S1

ER -