Muscle dysmorphia research neglects DSM-5 diagnostic criteria

Sebastian S. Sandgren, David Lavallee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to collect, evaluate, and synthesize the research on muscle dysmorphia (MD) post official recognition as a specifier for body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) in the DSM-5, and provide recommendations for future research. Literature searches were conducted in four databases to see if inclusion criteria were met. Results revealed 33 studies meeting inclusion criteria, none of which utilized DSM-5 criteria for MD and/or acknowledged the criterion in their research. Few studies acknowledged the association between MD and BDD, and the methodological quality of recent MD research was considered low due to a lack of clinical samples, measurements not using validated cut-off scores, and the research designs. In conclusion, future MD research is encouraged to utilize DSM-5 diagnostic criteria to better inform clinical practice; and significantly improve the methodological quality. As such, more effective treatment options may be developed reducing the risk of health harming consequences in these individuals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-243
Number of pages33
JournalJournal of Loss and Trauma
Volume23
Issue number3
Early online date30 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

neglect
diagnostic
Muscles
Body Dysmorphic Disorders
Research
inclusion
health consequences
research planning
Research Design
Databases
lack
Health

Cite this

@article{4fd5c15993b84b9e9f5a64e3aca2f307,
title = "Muscle dysmorphia research neglects DSM-5 diagnostic criteria",
abstract = "This systematic review aimed to collect, evaluate, and synthesize the research on muscle dysmorphia (MD) post official recognition as a specifier for body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) in the DSM-5, and provide recommendations for future research. Literature searches were conducted in four databases to see if inclusion criteria were met. Results revealed 33 studies meeting inclusion criteria, none of which utilized DSM-5 criteria for MD and/or acknowledged the criterion in their research. Few studies acknowledged the association between MD and BDD, and the methodological quality of recent MD research was considered low due to a lack of clinical samples, measurements not using validated cut-off scores, and the research designs. In conclusion, future MD research is encouraged to utilize DSM-5 diagnostic criteria to better inform clinical practice; and significantly improve the methodological quality. As such, more effective treatment options may be developed reducing the risk of health harming consequences in these individuals.",
author = "Sandgren, {Sebastian S.} and David Lavallee",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/15325024.2018.1428484",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "211--243",
journal = "Journal of Loss and Trauma",
issn = "1532-5024",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Muscle dysmorphia research neglects DSM-5 diagnostic criteria. / Sandgren, Sebastian S.; Lavallee, David.

In: Journal of Loss and Trauma, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2018, p. 211-243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Muscle dysmorphia research neglects DSM-5 diagnostic criteria

AU - Sandgren, Sebastian S.

AU - Lavallee, David

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This systematic review aimed to collect, evaluate, and synthesize the research on muscle dysmorphia (MD) post official recognition as a specifier for body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) in the DSM-5, and provide recommendations for future research. Literature searches were conducted in four databases to see if inclusion criteria were met. Results revealed 33 studies meeting inclusion criteria, none of which utilized DSM-5 criteria for MD and/or acknowledged the criterion in their research. Few studies acknowledged the association between MD and BDD, and the methodological quality of recent MD research was considered low due to a lack of clinical samples, measurements not using validated cut-off scores, and the research designs. In conclusion, future MD research is encouraged to utilize DSM-5 diagnostic criteria to better inform clinical practice; and significantly improve the methodological quality. As such, more effective treatment options may be developed reducing the risk of health harming consequences in these individuals.

AB - This systematic review aimed to collect, evaluate, and synthesize the research on muscle dysmorphia (MD) post official recognition as a specifier for body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) in the DSM-5, and provide recommendations for future research. Literature searches were conducted in four databases to see if inclusion criteria were met. Results revealed 33 studies meeting inclusion criteria, none of which utilized DSM-5 criteria for MD and/or acknowledged the criterion in their research. Few studies acknowledged the association between MD and BDD, and the methodological quality of recent MD research was considered low due to a lack of clinical samples, measurements not using validated cut-off scores, and the research designs. In conclusion, future MD research is encouraged to utilize DSM-5 diagnostic criteria to better inform clinical practice; and significantly improve the methodological quality. As such, more effective treatment options may be developed reducing the risk of health harming consequences in these individuals.

U2 - 10.1080/15325024.2018.1428484

DO - 10.1080/15325024.2018.1428484

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 211

EP - 243

JO - Journal of Loss and Trauma

JF - Journal of Loss and Trauma

SN - 1532-5024

IS - 3

ER -