No evidence for a mixing benefit—a registered report of voluntary dialect switching

Mathieu Declerck, Neil W. Kirk*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    9 Citations (Scopus)
    72 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Previous language production research with bidialectals has provided evidence for similar language control processes as during bilingual language production. In the current study, we aimed to further investigate this claim by examining bidialectals with a voluntary language switching paradigm. Research with bilinguals performing the voluntary language switching paradigm has consistently shown two effects. First, the cost of switching languages, relative to staying in the same language, is similar across the two languages. The second effect is more uniquely connected to voluntary language switching, namely a benefit when performing in mixed language blocks relative to single language blocks, which has been connected to proactive language control. While the bidialectals in this study also showed symmetrical switch costs, no mixing effect was observed. These results could be taken as evidence that bidialectal and bilingual language control are not entirely similar.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere0282086
    Number of pages14
    JournalPLOS ONE
    Volume18
    Issue number5
    Early online date4 May 2023
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2023

    Keywords

    • Language
    • Multilingualism
    • Scottish people
    • Dialectology
    • Reaction time
    • Qualitative studies
    • Semantics
    • Syllables

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'No evidence for a mixing benefit—a registered report of voluntary dialect switching'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this