Abstract
Previous language production research with bidialectals has provided evidence for similar language control processes as during bilingual language production. In the current study, we aimed to further investigate this claim by examining bidialectals with a voluntary language switching paradigm. Research with bilinguals performing the voluntary language switching paradigm has consistently shown two effects. First, the cost of switching languages, relative to staying in the same language, is similar across the two languages. The second effect is more uniquely connected to voluntary language switching, namely a benefit when performing in mixed language blocks relative to single language blocks, which has been connected to proactive language control. While the bidialectals in this study also showed symmetrical switch costs, no mixing effect was observed. These results could be taken as evidence that bidialectal and bilingual language control are not entirely similar.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e0282086 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | PLOS ONE |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 4 May 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 4 May 2023 |
Keywords
- Language
- Multilingualism
- Scottish people
- Dialectology
- Reaction time
- Qualitative studies
- Semantics
- Syllables
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'No evidence for a mixing benefit—a registered report of voluntary dialect switching'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Voluntary language switching - registered report
Kirk, N. (Contributor) & Declerck, M. (Contributor), OSF, 28 Apr 2022
Dataset