No selective deficit in recall in amnesia

Siobhan B. G. MacAndrew, Gregory V. Jones, Andrew R. Mayes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 6 Citations

Abstract

Are amnesic patients selectively impaired in recall relative to recognition? Experiment 1 studied a group of Korsakoff amnesics and matched the amnesic level of recognition with that of control subjects by testing control recognition of unrelated words after longer delays. It was found that under these conditions the observed levels of recall were also approximately equal. In Experiment 2, a similar result occurred when the Korsakoff amnesic level of recognition for unrelated words was matched by varying the number of presentations as well as delay before testing. In Experiment 3, a similar result occurred again with a group of amnesics of mixed aetiology and recognition levels for related words matched by varying the duration of presentation and delay before testing. In this experiment, both recognition and recall of the same items were assessed. It was found that for the amnesic group the observed level of dependency between recognition and recall was less than that for the control group. One possible interpretation of this result is that the microstructure of the recall process may be selectively disturbed in amnesia. The principal finding, however, is that in all three experiments there was no significant evidence of the existence in amnesia of a selective deficit in the overall level of recall relative to that of recognition.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-254
Number of pages14
JournalMemory
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Experiment
Amnesia
Testing
Microstructure
Etiology

Cite this

MacAndrew, S. B. G., Jones, G. V., & Mayes, A. R. (1994). No selective deficit in recall in amnesia. Memory, 2(3), 241-254. DOI: 10.1080/09658219408258947

MacAndrew, Siobhan B. G.; Jones, Gregory V.; Mayes, Andrew R. / No selective deficit in recall in amnesia.

In: Memory, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1994, p. 241-254.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b0e1e4ee488c4c23bf49d6af5a721860,
title = "No selective deficit in recall in amnesia",
abstract = "Are amnesic patients selectively impaired in recall relative to recognition? Experiment 1 studied a group of Korsakoff amnesics and matched the amnesic level of recognition with that of control subjects by testing control recognition of unrelated words after longer delays. It was found that under these conditions the observed levels of recall were also approximately equal. In Experiment 2, a similar result occurred when the Korsakoff amnesic level of recognition for unrelated words was matched by varying the number of presentations as well as delay before testing. In Experiment 3, a similar result occurred again with a group of amnesics of mixed aetiology and recognition levels for related words matched by varying the duration of presentation and delay before testing. In this experiment, both recognition and recall of the same items were assessed. It was found that for the amnesic group the observed level of dependency between recognition and recall was less than that for the control group. One possible interpretation of this result is that the microstructure of the recall process may be selectively disturbed in amnesia. The principal finding, however, is that in all three experiments there was no significant evidence of the existence in amnesia of a selective deficit in the overall level of recall relative to that of recognition.",
author = "MacAndrew, {Siobhan B. G.} and Jones, {Gregory V.} and Mayes, {Andrew R.}",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1080/09658219408258947",
volume = "2",
pages = "241--254",
journal = "Memory",
issn = "0965-8211",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "3",

}

MacAndrew, SBG, Jones, GV & Mayes, AR 1994, 'No selective deficit in recall in amnesia' Memory, vol 2, no. 3, pp. 241-254. DOI: 10.1080/09658219408258947

No selective deficit in recall in amnesia. / MacAndrew, Siobhan B. G.; Jones, Gregory V.; Mayes, Andrew R.

In: Memory, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1994, p. 241-254.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - No selective deficit in recall in amnesia

AU - MacAndrew,Siobhan B. G.

AU - Jones,Gregory V.

AU - Mayes,Andrew R.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Are amnesic patients selectively impaired in recall relative to recognition? Experiment 1 studied a group of Korsakoff amnesics and matched the amnesic level of recognition with that of control subjects by testing control recognition of unrelated words after longer delays. It was found that under these conditions the observed levels of recall were also approximately equal. In Experiment 2, a similar result occurred when the Korsakoff amnesic level of recognition for unrelated words was matched by varying the number of presentations as well as delay before testing. In Experiment 3, a similar result occurred again with a group of amnesics of mixed aetiology and recognition levels for related words matched by varying the duration of presentation and delay before testing. In this experiment, both recognition and recall of the same items were assessed. It was found that for the amnesic group the observed level of dependency between recognition and recall was less than that for the control group. One possible interpretation of this result is that the microstructure of the recall process may be selectively disturbed in amnesia. The principal finding, however, is that in all three experiments there was no significant evidence of the existence in amnesia of a selective deficit in the overall level of recall relative to that of recognition.

AB - Are amnesic patients selectively impaired in recall relative to recognition? Experiment 1 studied a group of Korsakoff amnesics and matched the amnesic level of recognition with that of control subjects by testing control recognition of unrelated words after longer delays. It was found that under these conditions the observed levels of recall were also approximately equal. In Experiment 2, a similar result occurred when the Korsakoff amnesic level of recognition for unrelated words was matched by varying the number of presentations as well as delay before testing. In Experiment 3, a similar result occurred again with a group of amnesics of mixed aetiology and recognition levels for related words matched by varying the duration of presentation and delay before testing. In this experiment, both recognition and recall of the same items were assessed. It was found that for the amnesic group the observed level of dependency between recognition and recall was less than that for the control group. One possible interpretation of this result is that the microstructure of the recall process may be selectively disturbed in amnesia. The principal finding, however, is that in all three experiments there was no significant evidence of the existence in amnesia of a selective deficit in the overall level of recall relative to that of recognition.

U2 - 10.1080/09658219408258947

DO - 10.1080/09658219408258947

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 241

EP - 254

JO - Memory

T2 - Memory

JF - Memory

SN - 0965-8211

IS - 3

ER -

MacAndrew SBG, Jones GV, Mayes AR. No selective deficit in recall in amnesia. Memory. 1994;2(3):241-254. Available from, DOI: 10.1080/09658219408258947