Optimal integration of shading and binocular disparity for depth perception

P. George Lovell, Marina Bloj, Julie M. Harris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We explore the relative utility of shape from shading and binocular disparity for depth perception. Ray-traced images either featured a smooth surface illuminated from above (shading-only) or were defined by small dots (disparity-only). Observers judged which of a pair of smoothly curved convex objects had most depth. The shading cue was around half as reliable as the rich disparity information for depth discrimination. Shading- and disparity-defined cues where combined by placing dots in the stimulus image, superimposed upon the shaded surface, resulting in veridical shading and binocular disparity. Independently varying the depth delivered by each channel allowed creation of conflicting disparity-defined and shading-defined depth. We manipulated the reliability of the disparity information by adding disparity noise. As noise levels in the disparity channel were increased, perceived depths and variances shifted toward those of the now more reliable shading cue. Several different models of cue combination were applied to the data. Perceived depths and variances were well predicted by a classic maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) model of cue integration, for all but one observer. We discuss the extent to which MLE is the most parsimonious model to account for observer performance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-18
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Vision Disparity
Depth Perception
Cues
Noise

Cite this

Lovell, P. George ; Bloj, Marina ; Harris, Julie M. / Optimal integration of shading and binocular disparity for depth perception. In: Journal of Vision. 2012 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 1-18.
@article{1a7e4bce0523465ba3f3751ca5956217,
title = "Optimal integration of shading and binocular disparity for depth perception",
abstract = "We explore the relative utility of shape from shading and binocular disparity for depth perception. Ray-traced images either featured a smooth surface illuminated from above (shading-only) or were defined by small dots (disparity-only). Observers judged which of a pair of smoothly curved convex objects had most depth. The shading cue was around half as reliable as the rich disparity information for depth discrimination. Shading- and disparity-defined cues where combined by placing dots in the stimulus image, superimposed upon the shaded surface, resulting in veridical shading and binocular disparity. Independently varying the depth delivered by each channel allowed creation of conflicting disparity-defined and shading-defined depth. We manipulated the reliability of the disparity information by adding disparity noise. As noise levels in the disparity channel were increased, perceived depths and variances shifted toward those of the now more reliable shading cue. Several different models of cue combination were applied to the data. Perceived depths and variances were well predicted by a classic maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) model of cue integration, for all but one observer. We discuss the extent to which MLE is the most parsimonious model to account for observer performance.",
author = "Lovell, {P. George} and Marina Bloj and Harris, {Julie M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1167/12.1.1",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Optimal integration of shading and binocular disparity for depth perception. / Lovell, P. George; Bloj, Marina; Harris, Julie M.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 12, No. 1, 03.01.2012, p. 1-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal integration of shading and binocular disparity for depth perception

AU - Lovell, P. George

AU - Bloj, Marina

AU - Harris, Julie M.

PY - 2012/1/3

Y1 - 2012/1/3

N2 - We explore the relative utility of shape from shading and binocular disparity for depth perception. Ray-traced images either featured a smooth surface illuminated from above (shading-only) or were defined by small dots (disparity-only). Observers judged which of a pair of smoothly curved convex objects had most depth. The shading cue was around half as reliable as the rich disparity information for depth discrimination. Shading- and disparity-defined cues where combined by placing dots in the stimulus image, superimposed upon the shaded surface, resulting in veridical shading and binocular disparity. Independently varying the depth delivered by each channel allowed creation of conflicting disparity-defined and shading-defined depth. We manipulated the reliability of the disparity information by adding disparity noise. As noise levels in the disparity channel were increased, perceived depths and variances shifted toward those of the now more reliable shading cue. Several different models of cue combination were applied to the data. Perceived depths and variances were well predicted by a classic maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) model of cue integration, for all but one observer. We discuss the extent to which MLE is the most parsimonious model to account for observer performance.

AB - We explore the relative utility of shape from shading and binocular disparity for depth perception. Ray-traced images either featured a smooth surface illuminated from above (shading-only) or were defined by small dots (disparity-only). Observers judged which of a pair of smoothly curved convex objects had most depth. The shading cue was around half as reliable as the rich disparity information for depth discrimination. Shading- and disparity-defined cues where combined by placing dots in the stimulus image, superimposed upon the shaded surface, resulting in veridical shading and binocular disparity. Independently varying the depth delivered by each channel allowed creation of conflicting disparity-defined and shading-defined depth. We manipulated the reliability of the disparity information by adding disparity noise. As noise levels in the disparity channel were increased, perceived depths and variances shifted toward those of the now more reliable shading cue. Several different models of cue combination were applied to the data. Perceived depths and variances were well predicted by a classic maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) model of cue integration, for all but one observer. We discuss the extent to which MLE is the most parsimonious model to account for observer performance.

U2 - 10.1167/12.1.1

DO - 10.1167/12.1.1

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 1

ER -