Own attractiveness and perceived relationship quality shape sensitivity in women’s memory for other men on the attractiveness dimension

Christopher D. Watkins*, Mike J. Nicholls, Carlota Batres, Dengke Xiao, Sean Talamas, David I. Perrett

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Although recent work suggests that opposite-sex facial attractiveness is less salient in memory when individuals are in a committed romantic relationship, romantic relationship quality can vary over time. In light of this, we tested whether activating concerns about romantic relationship quality strengthens memory for attractive faces. Partnered women were exposed briefly to faces manipulated in shape cues to attractiveness before either being asked to think about a moment of emotional closeness or distance in their current relationship. We measured sensitivity in memory for faces as the extent to which they recognized correct versions of studied faces over versions of the same person altered to look either more or less-attractive than their original (i.e. studied) version. Contrary to predictions, high relationship quality strengthened hit rate for faces regardless of the sex or attractiveness of the face. In general, women’s memories were more sensitive to attractiveness in women, but were biased toward attractiveness in male faces, both when responding to unfamiliar faces and versions of familiar faces that were more attractive than the original male identity from the learning phase. However, findings varied according to self-rated attractiveness and a psychometric measure of the quality of their current relationship. Attractive women were more sensitive to attractiveness in men, while their less-attractive peers had a stronger bias to remember women as more-attractive and men as less-attractive than their original image respectively. Women in better-quality romantic relationships had stronger positive biases toward, and false memories for, attractive men. Our findings suggest a sophisticated pattern of sensitivity and bias in women’s memory for facial cues to quality that varies systematically according to factors that may alter the costs of female mating competition (‘market demand’) and relationship maintenance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)146–154
Number of pages9
JournalCognition
Volume163
Early online date22 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

social attraction
trend
Cues
Attractiveness
psychometrics
Psychometrics
human being
Learning
demand
market
costs
Costs and Cost Analysis
learning
Romantic Relationships

Cite this

Watkins, Christopher D. ; Nicholls, Mike J. ; Batres, Carlota ; Xiao, Dengke ; Talamas, Sean ; Perrett, David I. / Own attractiveness and perceived relationship quality shape sensitivity in women’s memory for other men on the attractiveness dimension. In: Cognition. 2017 ; Vol. 163. pp. 146–154.
@article{913d664e19374be8995449d1b7820611,
title = "Own attractiveness and perceived relationship quality shape sensitivity in women’s memory for other men on the attractiveness dimension",
abstract = "Although recent work suggests that opposite-sex facial attractiveness is less salient in memory when individuals are in a committed romantic relationship, romantic relationship quality can vary over time. In light of this, we tested whether activating concerns about romantic relationship quality strengthens memory for attractive faces. Partnered women were exposed briefly to faces manipulated in shape cues to attractiveness before either being asked to think about a moment of emotional closeness or distance in their current relationship. We measured sensitivity in memory for faces as the extent to which they recognized correct versions of studied faces over versions of the same person altered to look either more or less-attractive than their original (i.e. studied) version. Contrary to predictions, high relationship quality strengthened hit rate for faces regardless of the sex or attractiveness of the face. In general, women’s memories were more sensitive to attractiveness in women, but were biased toward attractiveness in male faces, both when responding to unfamiliar faces and versions of familiar faces that were more attractive than the original male identity from the learning phase. However, findings varied according to self-rated attractiveness and a psychometric measure of the quality of their current relationship. Attractive women were more sensitive to attractiveness in men, while their less-attractive peers had a stronger bias to remember women as more-attractive and men as less-attractive than their original image respectively. Women in better-quality romantic relationships had stronger positive biases toward, and false memories for, attractive men. Our findings suggest a sophisticated pattern of sensitivity and bias in women’s memory for facial cues to quality that varies systematically according to factors that may alter the costs of female mating competition (‘market demand’) and relationship maintenance.",
author = "Watkins, {Christopher D.} and Nicholls, {Mike J.} and Carlota Batres and Dengke Xiao and Sean Talamas and Perrett, {David I.}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.007",
language = "English",
volume = "163",
pages = "146–154",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Own attractiveness and perceived relationship quality shape sensitivity in women’s memory for other men on the attractiveness dimension. / Watkins, Christopher D.; Nicholls, Mike J.; Batres, Carlota; Xiao, Dengke; Talamas, Sean; Perrett, David I.

In: Cognition, Vol. 163, 01.06.2017, p. 146–154.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Own attractiveness and perceived relationship quality shape sensitivity in women’s memory for other men on the attractiveness dimension

AU - Watkins, Christopher D.

AU - Nicholls, Mike J.

AU - Batres, Carlota

AU - Xiao, Dengke

AU - Talamas, Sean

AU - Perrett, David I.

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Although recent work suggests that opposite-sex facial attractiveness is less salient in memory when individuals are in a committed romantic relationship, romantic relationship quality can vary over time. In light of this, we tested whether activating concerns about romantic relationship quality strengthens memory for attractive faces. Partnered women were exposed briefly to faces manipulated in shape cues to attractiveness before either being asked to think about a moment of emotional closeness or distance in their current relationship. We measured sensitivity in memory for faces as the extent to which they recognized correct versions of studied faces over versions of the same person altered to look either more or less-attractive than their original (i.e. studied) version. Contrary to predictions, high relationship quality strengthened hit rate for faces regardless of the sex or attractiveness of the face. In general, women’s memories were more sensitive to attractiveness in women, but were biased toward attractiveness in male faces, both when responding to unfamiliar faces and versions of familiar faces that were more attractive than the original male identity from the learning phase. However, findings varied according to self-rated attractiveness and a psychometric measure of the quality of their current relationship. Attractive women were more sensitive to attractiveness in men, while their less-attractive peers had a stronger bias to remember women as more-attractive and men as less-attractive than their original image respectively. Women in better-quality romantic relationships had stronger positive biases toward, and false memories for, attractive men. Our findings suggest a sophisticated pattern of sensitivity and bias in women’s memory for facial cues to quality that varies systematically according to factors that may alter the costs of female mating competition (‘market demand’) and relationship maintenance.

AB - Although recent work suggests that opposite-sex facial attractiveness is less salient in memory when individuals are in a committed romantic relationship, romantic relationship quality can vary over time. In light of this, we tested whether activating concerns about romantic relationship quality strengthens memory for attractive faces. Partnered women were exposed briefly to faces manipulated in shape cues to attractiveness before either being asked to think about a moment of emotional closeness or distance in their current relationship. We measured sensitivity in memory for faces as the extent to which they recognized correct versions of studied faces over versions of the same person altered to look either more or less-attractive than their original (i.e. studied) version. Contrary to predictions, high relationship quality strengthened hit rate for faces regardless of the sex or attractiveness of the face. In general, women’s memories were more sensitive to attractiveness in women, but were biased toward attractiveness in male faces, both when responding to unfamiliar faces and versions of familiar faces that were more attractive than the original male identity from the learning phase. However, findings varied according to self-rated attractiveness and a psychometric measure of the quality of their current relationship. Attractive women were more sensitive to attractiveness in men, while their less-attractive peers had a stronger bias to remember women as more-attractive and men as less-attractive than their original image respectively. Women in better-quality romantic relationships had stronger positive biases toward, and false memories for, attractive men. Our findings suggest a sophisticated pattern of sensitivity and bias in women’s memory for facial cues to quality that varies systematically according to factors that may alter the costs of female mating competition (‘market demand’) and relationship maintenance.

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.007

M3 - Article

VL - 163

SP - 146

EP - 154

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

ER -