Persistent structural priming and frequency effects during comprehension

Martin J. Pickering, Janet F. McLean, Holly P. Branigan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We report 2 experiments using a sentence–picture matching task concerned with the interpretation of prepositional phrases that were ambiguous between high and low attachment (Branigan, Pickering, & McLean, 2005). After reading a prime sentence with a particular interpretation, participants tended to interpret an ambiguous prepositional phrase in a target sentence in the same way, whether the prime and target sentences used the same verb (Experiment 1) or used different verbs (Experiment 2). Both experiments also found that these effects were unaffected by whether prime and target sentences were adjacent or separated by 1 or 2 “fillers” consisting of sentences and pictures unrelated to the prime and target. We argue that both lexically independent and lexically specific structural priming effects occur in comprehension, and may persist, and suggest that a common mechanism may underlie structural priming effects and at least some lexically specific and lexically independent frequency effects in comprehension.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)890-897
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2013

Fingerprint

Reading

Cite this

@article{1ad76ac2adc145c8b7099c62b8cdc4c7,
title = "Persistent structural priming and frequency effects during comprehension",
abstract = "We report 2 experiments using a sentence–picture matching task concerned with the interpretation of prepositional phrases that were ambiguous between high and low attachment (Branigan, Pickering, & McLean, 2005). After reading a prime sentence with a particular interpretation, participants tended to interpret an ambiguous prepositional phrase in a target sentence in the same way, whether the prime and target sentences used the same verb (Experiment 1) or used different verbs (Experiment 2). Both experiments also found that these effects were unaffected by whether prime and target sentences were adjacent or separated by 1 or 2 “fillers” consisting of sentences and pictures unrelated to the prime and target. We argue that both lexically independent and lexically specific structural priming effects occur in comprehension, and may persist, and suggest that a common mechanism may underlie structural priming effects and at least some lexically specific and lexically independent frequency effects in comprehension.",
author = "Pickering, {Martin J.} and McLean, {Janet F.} and Branigan, {Holly P.}",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1037/a0029181",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "890--897",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Persistent structural priming and frequency effects during comprehension. / Pickering, Martin J.; McLean, Janet F.; Branigan, Holly P.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 39, No. 3, 05.2013, p. 890-897.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Persistent structural priming and frequency effects during comprehension

AU - Pickering, Martin J.

AU - McLean, Janet F.

AU - Branigan, Holly P.

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - We report 2 experiments using a sentence–picture matching task concerned with the interpretation of prepositional phrases that were ambiguous between high and low attachment (Branigan, Pickering, & McLean, 2005). After reading a prime sentence with a particular interpretation, participants tended to interpret an ambiguous prepositional phrase in a target sentence in the same way, whether the prime and target sentences used the same verb (Experiment 1) or used different verbs (Experiment 2). Both experiments also found that these effects were unaffected by whether prime and target sentences were adjacent or separated by 1 or 2 “fillers” consisting of sentences and pictures unrelated to the prime and target. We argue that both lexically independent and lexically specific structural priming effects occur in comprehension, and may persist, and suggest that a common mechanism may underlie structural priming effects and at least some lexically specific and lexically independent frequency effects in comprehension.

AB - We report 2 experiments using a sentence–picture matching task concerned with the interpretation of prepositional phrases that were ambiguous between high and low attachment (Branigan, Pickering, & McLean, 2005). After reading a prime sentence with a particular interpretation, participants tended to interpret an ambiguous prepositional phrase in a target sentence in the same way, whether the prime and target sentences used the same verb (Experiment 1) or used different verbs (Experiment 2). Both experiments also found that these effects were unaffected by whether prime and target sentences were adjacent or separated by 1 or 2 “fillers” consisting of sentences and pictures unrelated to the prime and target. We argue that both lexically independent and lexically specific structural priming effects occur in comprehension, and may persist, and suggest that a common mechanism may underlie structural priming effects and at least some lexically specific and lexically independent frequency effects in comprehension.

U2 - 10.1037/a0029181

DO - 10.1037/a0029181

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 890

EP - 897

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 3

ER -