Policing after the crisis: crime, safety and the vulnerable public

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 8 Citations

Abstract

The growth of laws, surveillance and policing across British society can be linked back to changes under the Conservative governments of the 1970s and 1980s. However, despite some `authoritarian' developments at this time, it was not until Margaret Thatcher's demise, that there was a quantitative and qualitative shift in governing towards a form of `governing through crime'. Many of these developments have been associated with the rise of a right wing, or neo-liberal dynamic in society. However, this article argues that the obsession with crime, antisocial behaviour and the regulation of everyday life did not emerge as part of an aggressive form of neo-liberalism. Rather than their being an energetic politics behind these developments, it is more accurate to see the growth in law and the more direct regulation of society as a consequence of the collapse of politics on both the left and the right. Rather than competing for the conflicting political subject in society, the role of politicians now became to act as advocates for a diminished subject — the crime victim and the vulnerable public. Crime expanded as a field of governance due both to the political elite's sense of diminished capacity and control over society, and with the construction of a more fragile subject that needed ever more protections.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)359-376
Number of pages18
JournalPunishment and Society
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

offense
society
development
politics
growth
subject
political elite
neoliberalism
everyday life
surveillance
politician
victim
governance
crisis
security
capacity
construction
consequences
government
behavior

Cite this

Waiton, Stuart / Policing after the crisis : crime, safety and the vulnerable public.

In: Punishment and Society, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2009, p. 359-376.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bc7587ae50904aa9a52a0d2be00a08b4,
title = "Policing after the crisis: crime, safety and the vulnerable public",
abstract = "The growth of laws, surveillance and policing across British society can be linked back to changes under the Conservative governments of the 1970s and 1980s. However, despite some `authoritarian' developments at this time, it was not until Margaret Thatcher's demise, that there was a quantitative and qualitative shift in governing towards a form of `governing through crime'. Many of these developments have been associated with the rise of a right wing, or neo-liberal dynamic in society. However, this article argues that the obsession with crime, antisocial behaviour and the regulation of everyday life did not emerge as part of an aggressive form of neo-liberalism. Rather than their being an energetic politics behind these developments, it is more accurate to see the growth in law and the more direct regulation of society as a consequence of the collapse of politics on both the left and the right. Rather than competing for the conflicting political subject in society, the role of politicians now became to act as advocates for a diminished subject — the crime victim and the vulnerable public. Crime expanded as a field of governance due both to the political elite's sense of diminished capacity and control over society, and with the construction of a more fragile subject that needed ever more protections.",
author = "Stuart Waiton",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1177/1462474509334608",
volume = "11",
pages = "359--376",
journal = "Punishment and Society",
issn = "1462-4745",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Policing after the crisis : crime, safety and the vulnerable public. / Waiton, Stuart.

In: Punishment and Society, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2009, p. 359-376.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Policing after the crisis

T2 - Punishment and Society

AU - Waiton,Stuart

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The growth of laws, surveillance and policing across British society can be linked back to changes under the Conservative governments of the 1970s and 1980s. However, despite some `authoritarian' developments at this time, it was not until Margaret Thatcher's demise, that there was a quantitative and qualitative shift in governing towards a form of `governing through crime'. Many of these developments have been associated with the rise of a right wing, or neo-liberal dynamic in society. However, this article argues that the obsession with crime, antisocial behaviour and the regulation of everyday life did not emerge as part of an aggressive form of neo-liberalism. Rather than their being an energetic politics behind these developments, it is more accurate to see the growth in law and the more direct regulation of society as a consequence of the collapse of politics on both the left and the right. Rather than competing for the conflicting political subject in society, the role of politicians now became to act as advocates for a diminished subject — the crime victim and the vulnerable public. Crime expanded as a field of governance due both to the political elite's sense of diminished capacity and control over society, and with the construction of a more fragile subject that needed ever more protections.

AB - The growth of laws, surveillance and policing across British society can be linked back to changes under the Conservative governments of the 1970s and 1980s. However, despite some `authoritarian' developments at this time, it was not until Margaret Thatcher's demise, that there was a quantitative and qualitative shift in governing towards a form of `governing through crime'. Many of these developments have been associated with the rise of a right wing, or neo-liberal dynamic in society. However, this article argues that the obsession with crime, antisocial behaviour and the regulation of everyday life did not emerge as part of an aggressive form of neo-liberalism. Rather than their being an energetic politics behind these developments, it is more accurate to see the growth in law and the more direct regulation of society as a consequence of the collapse of politics on both the left and the right. Rather than competing for the conflicting political subject in society, the role of politicians now became to act as advocates for a diminished subject — the crime victim and the vulnerable public. Crime expanded as a field of governance due both to the political elite's sense of diminished capacity and control over society, and with the construction of a more fragile subject that needed ever more protections.

U2 - 10.1177/1462474509334608

DO - 10.1177/1462474509334608

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 359

EP - 376

JO - Punishment and Society

JF - Punishment and Society

SN - 1462-4745

IS - 3

ER -