Postincident conferring by law enforcement officers: determining the impact of team discussions on statement content, accuracy, and officer beliefs

Lorraine Hope, Fiona Gabbert, Joanne Fraser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In many jurisdictions, law enforcement officers are permitted to discuss their recall of an incident when preparing their official statement. This practice has been criticized on the grounds that it lacks transparency and may produce inaccurate corroborative accounts. In the current study, 300 armed officers took part in an interactive staged crime scenario and were permitted to confer (or not) while writing statements. Alternative procedures for statement production by teams were also evaluated. Some officers also provided an independent statement prior to conferring while others were provided with retrieval support instructions. Although errors were transmitted during discussions, conferring had no overall impact on the accuracy or content of final statements. However, officers who wrote an initial independent statement did not incorporate any errors obtained from colleagues into their final accounts. Conferring officers expressed greater confidence in the accuracy of their accounts than nonconferring officers despite no differences in accuracy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-127
Number of pages11
JournalLaw and Human Behavior
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Police
Crime
law enforcement
transparency
Law Enforcement
jurisdiction
incident
confidence
offense
scenario
instruction
lack

Cite this

@article{1d4ecbf037a4481cae42caef8521ed0b,
title = "Postincident conferring by law enforcement officers: determining the impact of team discussions on statement content, accuracy, and officer beliefs",
abstract = "In many jurisdictions, law enforcement officers are permitted to discuss their recall of an incident when preparing their official statement. This practice has been criticized on the grounds that it lacks transparency and may produce inaccurate corroborative accounts. In the current study, 300 armed officers took part in an interactive staged crime scenario and were permitted to confer (or not) while writing statements. Alternative procedures for statement production by teams were also evaluated. Some officers also provided an independent statement prior to conferring while others were provided with retrieval support instructions. Although errors were transmitted during discussions, conferring had no overall impact on the accuracy or content of final statements. However, officers who wrote an initial independent statement did not incorporate any errors obtained from colleagues into their final accounts. Conferring officers expressed greater confidence in the accuracy of their accounts than nonconferring officers despite no differences in accuracy.",
author = "Lorraine Hope and Fiona Gabbert and Joanne Fraser",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1037/lhb0000019",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "117--127",
journal = "Law and Human Behavior",
issn = "0147-7307",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

Postincident conferring by law enforcement officers : determining the impact of team discussions on statement content, accuracy, and officer beliefs. / Hope, Lorraine; Gabbert, Fiona; Fraser, Joanne.

In: Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 37, No. 2, 04.2013, p. 117-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Postincident conferring by law enforcement officers

T2 - determining the impact of team discussions on statement content, accuracy, and officer beliefs

AU - Hope, Lorraine

AU - Gabbert, Fiona

AU - Fraser, Joanne

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - In many jurisdictions, law enforcement officers are permitted to discuss their recall of an incident when preparing their official statement. This practice has been criticized on the grounds that it lacks transparency and may produce inaccurate corroborative accounts. In the current study, 300 armed officers took part in an interactive staged crime scenario and were permitted to confer (or not) while writing statements. Alternative procedures for statement production by teams were also evaluated. Some officers also provided an independent statement prior to conferring while others were provided with retrieval support instructions. Although errors were transmitted during discussions, conferring had no overall impact on the accuracy or content of final statements. However, officers who wrote an initial independent statement did not incorporate any errors obtained from colleagues into their final accounts. Conferring officers expressed greater confidence in the accuracy of their accounts than nonconferring officers despite no differences in accuracy.

AB - In many jurisdictions, law enforcement officers are permitted to discuss their recall of an incident when preparing their official statement. This practice has been criticized on the grounds that it lacks transparency and may produce inaccurate corroborative accounts. In the current study, 300 armed officers took part in an interactive staged crime scenario and were permitted to confer (or not) while writing statements. Alternative procedures for statement production by teams were also evaluated. Some officers also provided an independent statement prior to conferring while others were provided with retrieval support instructions. Although errors were transmitted during discussions, conferring had no overall impact on the accuracy or content of final statements. However, officers who wrote an initial independent statement did not incorporate any errors obtained from colleagues into their final accounts. Conferring officers expressed greater confidence in the accuracy of their accounts than nonconferring officers despite no differences in accuracy.

U2 - 10.1037/lhb0000019

DO - 10.1037/lhb0000019

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 117

EP - 127

JO - Law and Human Behavior

JF - Law and Human Behavior

SN - 0147-7307

IS - 2

ER -