Abstract
While appropriate for practical topics like SQL, our traditional format of lecture and lab fails to facilitate the discussion of more theoretical database topics with students. This paper describes and analyses the method and effects of adopting a more flexible approach with third year and postgraduate students. Some weeks use supervised labs while in others tutorials are held in seminar rooms, in smaller groups, without the distraction of computers. Requiring tutorials to be prepared in advance allows time to be used effectively, concentrating on more difficult aspects.
Initial results, presented in this paper, are encouraging. Many students enjoy tutorials and exam performance has improved dramatically for some. However, as many as 25% of undergraduate students failed to attend a single tutorial, and many of those who did attend came unprepared. Could, and should, this be changed by explicitly assessing tutorials? The paper concludes by investigating approaches reported elsewhere in order to ascertain how the management of tutorials could be improved.
Initial results, presented in this paper, are encouraging. Many students enjoy tutorials and exam performance has improved dramatically for some. However, as many as 25% of undergraduate students failed to attend a single tutorial, and many of those who did attend came unprepared. Could, and should, this be changed by explicitly assessing tutorials? The paper concludes by investigating approaches reported elsewhere in order to ascertain how the management of tutorials could be improved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | HEA Teaching, Learning and Assessment in Databases (TLAD 04) Proceedings |
Place of Publication | Newtownabbey |
Publisher | Higher Education Academy |
Number of pages | 6 |
Publication status | Published - 2004 |
Keywords
- Teaching
- Learning
- Delivery
- Syllabus