Predicting general well-being from self-esteem and affectivity: an exploratory study with Scottish adolescents

Athanasios Karatzias*, Zoë Chouliara, Kevin Power, Vivien Swanson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study investigated the association between the personality constructs of self-esteem/affectivity and General Well-Being (GWB) in Scottish adolescents. A total of 425 secondary school pupils completed the P.G.I. General Well-Being Scale [Verma et al. Ind J. Clin. Psychol. 10 (1983) 299], the Hare Self-esteem Scale (HSES) [Hare, The Hare General and Area-Specific (School, Peer, and Home) Self-esteem Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, SUNY Stony Brook, New York, mineo, 1985] and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) [Watson et al. J Personal Soc Psychol 54 (1988a) 1063]. Combined self-esteem, positive and negative affectivity, age and gender accounted for 49.7% of the total GWB variance, 24.9% of the physical well-being variance, 41.6% of the mood/affect well-being variance, 33.3% of the anxiety well-being variance and 44.3% of the self/others well-being variance. Home self-esteem was found the strongest predictor of mood/affect and self/others well-being domains as well as well-being total. It was also the second best predictor of anxiety well-being domain. School self-esteem was the strongest predictor of physical well-being, whereas negative affectivity was the strongest predictor of anxiety well-being domain. However age and gender were not significantly associated with GWB, total or domain specific. The study adds to previous evidence regarding the high association between GWB and personality factors in adult and adolescent populations. Directions for future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1143-1151
Number of pages9
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume15
Issue number7
Early online date13 Sep 2006
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Self Concept
Hares
Anxiety
Personality
Sociology
Manuscripts
Pupil
Appointments and Schedules
Population

Cite this

Karatzias, Athanasios ; Chouliara, Zoë ; Power, Kevin ; Swanson, Vivien. / Predicting general well-being from self-esteem and affectivity : an exploratory study with Scottish adolescents. In: Quality of Life Research. 2006 ; Vol. 15, No. 7. pp. 1143-1151.
@article{ed4c730b87654e5c8aada88f8885bc5e,
title = "Predicting general well-being from self-esteem and affectivity: an exploratory study with Scottish adolescents",
abstract = "The present study investigated the association between the personality constructs of self-esteem/affectivity and General Well-Being (GWB) in Scottish adolescents. A total of 425 secondary school pupils completed the P.G.I. General Well-Being Scale [Verma et al. Ind J. Clin. Psychol. 10 (1983) 299], the Hare Self-esteem Scale (HSES) [Hare, The Hare General and Area-Specific (School, Peer, and Home) Self-esteem Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, SUNY Stony Brook, New York, mineo, 1985] and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) [Watson et al. J Personal Soc Psychol 54 (1988a) 1063]. Combined self-esteem, positive and negative affectivity, age and gender accounted for 49.7{\%} of the total GWB variance, 24.9{\%} of the physical well-being variance, 41.6{\%} of the mood/affect well-being variance, 33.3{\%} of the anxiety well-being variance and 44.3{\%} of the self/others well-being variance. Home self-esteem was found the strongest predictor of mood/affect and self/others well-being domains as well as well-being total. It was also the second best predictor of anxiety well-being domain. School self-esteem was the strongest predictor of physical well-being, whereas negative affectivity was the strongest predictor of anxiety well-being domain. However age and gender were not significantly associated with GWB, total or domain specific. The study adds to previous evidence regarding the high association between GWB and personality factors in adult and adolescent populations. Directions for future research are discussed.",
author = "Athanasios Karatzias and Zo{\"e} Chouliara and Kevin Power and Vivien Swanson",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11136-006-0064-2",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "1143--1151",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "7",

}

Predicting general well-being from self-esteem and affectivity : an exploratory study with Scottish adolescents. / Karatzias, Athanasios; Chouliara, Zoë; Power, Kevin; Swanson, Vivien.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 15, No. 7, 09.2006, p. 1143-1151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting general well-being from self-esteem and affectivity

T2 - an exploratory study with Scottish adolescents

AU - Karatzias, Athanasios

AU - Chouliara, Zoë

AU - Power, Kevin

AU - Swanson, Vivien

PY - 2006/9

Y1 - 2006/9

N2 - The present study investigated the association between the personality constructs of self-esteem/affectivity and General Well-Being (GWB) in Scottish adolescents. A total of 425 secondary school pupils completed the P.G.I. General Well-Being Scale [Verma et al. Ind J. Clin. Psychol. 10 (1983) 299], the Hare Self-esteem Scale (HSES) [Hare, The Hare General and Area-Specific (School, Peer, and Home) Self-esteem Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, SUNY Stony Brook, New York, mineo, 1985] and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) [Watson et al. J Personal Soc Psychol 54 (1988a) 1063]. Combined self-esteem, positive and negative affectivity, age and gender accounted for 49.7% of the total GWB variance, 24.9% of the physical well-being variance, 41.6% of the mood/affect well-being variance, 33.3% of the anxiety well-being variance and 44.3% of the self/others well-being variance. Home self-esteem was found the strongest predictor of mood/affect and self/others well-being domains as well as well-being total. It was also the second best predictor of anxiety well-being domain. School self-esteem was the strongest predictor of physical well-being, whereas negative affectivity was the strongest predictor of anxiety well-being domain. However age and gender were not significantly associated with GWB, total or domain specific. The study adds to previous evidence regarding the high association between GWB and personality factors in adult and adolescent populations. Directions for future research are discussed.

AB - The present study investigated the association between the personality constructs of self-esteem/affectivity and General Well-Being (GWB) in Scottish adolescents. A total of 425 secondary school pupils completed the P.G.I. General Well-Being Scale [Verma et al. Ind J. Clin. Psychol. 10 (1983) 299], the Hare Self-esteem Scale (HSES) [Hare, The Hare General and Area-Specific (School, Peer, and Home) Self-esteem Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, SUNY Stony Brook, New York, mineo, 1985] and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) [Watson et al. J Personal Soc Psychol 54 (1988a) 1063]. Combined self-esteem, positive and negative affectivity, age and gender accounted for 49.7% of the total GWB variance, 24.9% of the physical well-being variance, 41.6% of the mood/affect well-being variance, 33.3% of the anxiety well-being variance and 44.3% of the self/others well-being variance. Home self-esteem was found the strongest predictor of mood/affect and self/others well-being domains as well as well-being total. It was also the second best predictor of anxiety well-being domain. School self-esteem was the strongest predictor of physical well-being, whereas negative affectivity was the strongest predictor of anxiety well-being domain. However age and gender were not significantly associated with GWB, total or domain specific. The study adds to previous evidence regarding the high association between GWB and personality factors in adult and adolescent populations. Directions for future research are discussed.

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-006-0064-2

DO - 10.1007/s11136-006-0064-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 16972157

AN - SCOPUS:39049182426

VL - 15

SP - 1143

EP - 1151

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

IS - 7

ER -