Predictive validity of the HCR-20 for inpatient aggression: the effect of intellectual disability on accuracy

L. E. O'Shea, M. M. Picchioni, J. McCarthy, F. L. Mason, G. L. Dickens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)
110 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
People with intellectual disability (ID) account for a large proportion of aggressive incidents in secure and forensic psychiatric services. Although the Historical, Clinical, Risk Management 20 (HCR-20) has good predictive validity in inpatient settings, it does not perform equally in all groups and there is little evidence for its efficacy in those with ID.

Method
A pseudo-prospective cohort study of the predictive efficacy of the HCR-20 for those with ID (n = 109) was conducted in a UK secure mental health setting using routinely collected risk data. Performance of the HCR-20 in the ID group was compared with a comparison group of adult inpatients without an ID (n = 504). Analysis controlled for potential covariates including security level, length of stay, gender and diagnosis.

Results
The HCR-20 total score was a significant predictor of any aggression and of physical aggression for both groups, although the area under the curve values did not reach the threshold for a large effect size. The clinical subscale performed significantly better in those without an ID compared with those with. The ID group had a greater number of relevant historical and risk management items. The clinicians' summary judgment significantly predicted both types of aggressive outcomes in the ID group, but did not predict either in those without an ID.

Conclusions
This study demonstrates that, after controlling for a range of potential covariates, the HCR-20 is a significant predictor of inpatient aggression in people with an ID and performs as well as for a comparison group of mentally disordered individuals without ID. The potency of HCR-20 subscales and items varied between the ID and comparison groups suggesting important target areas for improved prediction and risk management interventions in those with ID.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1042-1054
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Intellectual Disability Research
Volume59
Issue number11
Early online date13 Feb 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2015

Fingerprint

Risk Management
Aggression
Intellectual Disability
Inpatients
Forensic Psychiatry
Disabled Persons
Area Under Curve
Length of Stay
Mental Health
Cohort Studies

Cite this

O'Shea, L. E. ; Picchioni, M. M. ; McCarthy, J. ; Mason, F. L. ; Dickens, G. L. / Predictive validity of the HCR-20 for inpatient aggression : the effect of intellectual disability on accuracy. In: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 2015 ; Vol. 59, No. 11. pp. 1042-1054.
@article{fc62205f69ec4a17aff7ce758b751771,
title = "Predictive validity of the HCR-20 for inpatient aggression: the effect of intellectual disability on accuracy",
abstract = "BackgroundPeople with intellectual disability (ID) account for a large proportion of aggressive incidents in secure and forensic psychiatric services. Although the Historical, Clinical, Risk Management 20 (HCR-20) has good predictive validity in inpatient settings, it does not perform equally in all groups and there is little evidence for its efficacy in those with ID.MethodA pseudo-prospective cohort study of the predictive efficacy of the HCR-20 for those with ID (n = 109) was conducted in a UK secure mental health setting using routinely collected risk data. Performance of the HCR-20 in the ID group was compared with a comparison group of adult inpatients without an ID (n = 504). Analysis controlled for potential covariates including security level, length of stay, gender and diagnosis.ResultsThe HCR-20 total score was a significant predictor of any aggression and of physical aggression for both groups, although the area under the curve values did not reach the threshold for a large effect size. The clinical subscale performed significantly better in those without an ID compared with those with. The ID group had a greater number of relevant historical and risk management items. The clinicians' summary judgment significantly predicted both types of aggressive outcomes in the ID group, but did not predict either in those without an ID.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that, after controlling for a range of potential covariates, the HCR-20 is a significant predictor of inpatient aggression in people with an ID and performs as well as for a comparison group of mentally disordered individuals without ID. The potency of HCR-20 subscales and items varied between the ID and comparison groups suggesting important target areas for improved prediction and risk management interventions in those with ID.",
author = "O'Shea, {L. E.} and Picchioni, {M. M.} and J. McCarthy and Mason, {F. L.} and Dickens, {G. L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/jir.12184",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "1042--1054",
journal = "Journal of Intellectual Disability Research",
issn = "0964-2633",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

Predictive validity of the HCR-20 for inpatient aggression : the effect of intellectual disability on accuracy. / O'Shea, L. E.; Picchioni, M. M.; McCarthy, J.; Mason, F. L.; Dickens, G. L.

In: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Vol. 59, No. 11, 11.2015, p. 1042-1054.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictive validity of the HCR-20 for inpatient aggression

T2 - the effect of intellectual disability on accuracy

AU - O'Shea, L. E.

AU - Picchioni, M. M.

AU - McCarthy, J.

AU - Mason, F. L.

AU - Dickens, G. L.

PY - 2015/11

Y1 - 2015/11

N2 - BackgroundPeople with intellectual disability (ID) account for a large proportion of aggressive incidents in secure and forensic psychiatric services. Although the Historical, Clinical, Risk Management 20 (HCR-20) has good predictive validity in inpatient settings, it does not perform equally in all groups and there is little evidence for its efficacy in those with ID.MethodA pseudo-prospective cohort study of the predictive efficacy of the HCR-20 for those with ID (n = 109) was conducted in a UK secure mental health setting using routinely collected risk data. Performance of the HCR-20 in the ID group was compared with a comparison group of adult inpatients without an ID (n = 504). Analysis controlled for potential covariates including security level, length of stay, gender and diagnosis.ResultsThe HCR-20 total score was a significant predictor of any aggression and of physical aggression for both groups, although the area under the curve values did not reach the threshold for a large effect size. The clinical subscale performed significantly better in those without an ID compared with those with. The ID group had a greater number of relevant historical and risk management items. The clinicians' summary judgment significantly predicted both types of aggressive outcomes in the ID group, but did not predict either in those without an ID.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that, after controlling for a range of potential covariates, the HCR-20 is a significant predictor of inpatient aggression in people with an ID and performs as well as for a comparison group of mentally disordered individuals without ID. The potency of HCR-20 subscales and items varied between the ID and comparison groups suggesting important target areas for improved prediction and risk management interventions in those with ID.

AB - BackgroundPeople with intellectual disability (ID) account for a large proportion of aggressive incidents in secure and forensic psychiatric services. Although the Historical, Clinical, Risk Management 20 (HCR-20) has good predictive validity in inpatient settings, it does not perform equally in all groups and there is little evidence for its efficacy in those with ID.MethodA pseudo-prospective cohort study of the predictive efficacy of the HCR-20 for those with ID (n = 109) was conducted in a UK secure mental health setting using routinely collected risk data. Performance of the HCR-20 in the ID group was compared with a comparison group of adult inpatients without an ID (n = 504). Analysis controlled for potential covariates including security level, length of stay, gender and diagnosis.ResultsThe HCR-20 total score was a significant predictor of any aggression and of physical aggression for both groups, although the area under the curve values did not reach the threshold for a large effect size. The clinical subscale performed significantly better in those without an ID compared with those with. The ID group had a greater number of relevant historical and risk management items. The clinicians' summary judgment significantly predicted both types of aggressive outcomes in the ID group, but did not predict either in those without an ID.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that, after controlling for a range of potential covariates, the HCR-20 is a significant predictor of inpatient aggression in people with an ID and performs as well as for a comparison group of mentally disordered individuals without ID. The potency of HCR-20 subscales and items varied between the ID and comparison groups suggesting important target areas for improved prediction and risk management interventions in those with ID.

U2 - 10.1111/jir.12184

DO - 10.1111/jir.12184

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 1042

EP - 1054

JO - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

JF - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

SN - 0964-2633

IS - 11

ER -