Predictive validity of the short-term assessment of risk and treatability (START) for aggression and self-harm in a secure mental health service: gender differences

Laura E. O'Shea, Geoffrey L. Dickens*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)
161 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The START predicts aggressive outcomes and to some extent self-harm. However, it is not known whether gender moderates its performance. This study used routinely collected data to investigate the predictive ability of the START for aggression and self-harm in secure psychiatric patients. Utility of the START was examined separately for men and women. The START was a stronger predictor of aggression and self-harm in women than men. The specific risk estimates produced large effect sizes for the prediction of aggression and self-harm in women; none of the AUC values reached the threshold for a large effect size in the male sample.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)132-146
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Forensic Mental Health
Volume14
Issue number2
Early online date1 Jun 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2015

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Predictive validity of the short-term assessment of risk and treatability (START) for aggression and self-harm in a secure mental health service: gender differences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this