Prospective dynamic assessment of risk of sexual reoffending in individuals with an intellectual disability and a history of sexual offending behaviour

Rachael E. Lofthouse, William R. Lindsay, Vasiliki Totsika, Richard P. Hastings, Douglas P. Boer, James L. Haaven

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    42 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background
    The purpose of the present study was to add to the literature on the predictive accuracy of a dynamic intellectual disability specific risk assessment tool.
    Method
    A dynamic risk assessment for sexual reoffending (ARMIDILO-S), a static risk assessment for sexual offending (STATIC-99), and a static risk assessment for violence (Violence Risk Appraisal Guide [VRAG]) were completed for a sample of 64 adult males with an intellectual disability.
    Results
    The dynamic risk assessment for sexual offenders with an intellectual disability resulted in the best prediction of sexual reoffending (ARMIDILO-S area under the curve (AUC) = 0.92) this was better than an established sexual offending static risk assessment (STATIC-99 AUC = 0.75). A static tool for violent reoffending, did not perform as well in this group (VRAG AUC = 0.58).
    Conclusions
    Results suggest that dynamic variables are useful in predicting sexual reoffending with individuals with an intellectual disability, confirming previous findings. The ARMIDILO-S is a promising dynamic risk assessment for individuals with an intellectual disability.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)394–403
    Number of pages10
    JournalJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
    Volume26
    Issue number5
    Early online date8 Aug 2013
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2013

    Keywords

    • Developmental delay
    • Dynamic risk assessment
    • Intellectual disability
    • Reoffending
    • Risk assessment
    • Sexual offending

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective dynamic assessment of risk of sexual reoffending in individuals with an intellectual disability and a history of sexual offending behaviour'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this