Protecting and enhancing eyewitness memory: the impact of an initial recall attempt on performance in an investigative interview

Lorraine Hope, Fiona Gabbert, Ronald P. Fisher, Kat Jamieson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evidence-gathering begins at the scene of an incident. Available witnesses may be asked to provide an account of what happened, either in response to an open request for information or, in some regions, by completing a Self-Administered Interview (SAI©). In both cases, an investigative interview may be conducted at some later date. This study sought to determine the impact of an initial retrieval attempt on a subsequent interview. After exposure to a mock crime, participants completed an SAI© or a free recall (FR), or did not engage in an initial retrieval (Control). One week later, participants were interviewed with a Cognitive Interview. SAI© participants reported more correct information and maintained higher accuracy than FR and Control participants. Consistency analyses revealed that the SAI© was effective because it preserved more of the originally recalled items (Time 1) than did an initial FR, and not because it yielded new recollections at Time 2.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)304–313
Number of pages10
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Volume28
Issue number3
Early online date6 Mar 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2014

Fingerprint

Interviews
Crime
Eyewitness
Free Recall

Cite this

Hope, Lorraine ; Gabbert, Fiona ; Fisher, Ronald P. ; Jamieson, Kat. / Protecting and enhancing eyewitness memory : the impact of an initial recall attempt on performance in an investigative interview. In: Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2014 ; Vol. 28, No. 3. pp. 304–313.
@article{50ecfc8de1214da8bbd4e90223257408,
title = "Protecting and enhancing eyewitness memory: the impact of an initial recall attempt on performance in an investigative interview",
abstract = "Evidence-gathering begins at the scene of an incident. Available witnesses may be asked to provide an account of what happened, either in response to an open request for information or, in some regions, by completing a Self-Administered Interview (SAI{\circledC}). In both cases, an investigative interview may be conducted at some later date. This study sought to determine the impact of an initial retrieval attempt on a subsequent interview. After exposure to a mock crime, participants completed an SAI{\circledC} or a free recall (FR), or did not engage in an initial retrieval (Control). One week later, participants were interviewed with a Cognitive Interview. SAI{\circledC} participants reported more correct information and maintained higher accuracy than FR and Control participants. Consistency analyses revealed that the SAI{\circledC} was effective because it preserved more of the originally recalled items (Time 1) than did an initial FR, and not because it yielded new recollections at Time 2.",
author = "Lorraine Hope and Fiona Gabbert and Fisher, {Ronald P.} and Kat Jamieson",
year = "2014",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1002/acp.2984",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "304–313",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0888-4080",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Protecting and enhancing eyewitness memory : the impact of an initial recall attempt on performance in an investigative interview. / Hope, Lorraine; Gabbert, Fiona; Fisher, Ronald P.; Jamieson, Kat.

In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 3, 05.2014, p. 304–313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protecting and enhancing eyewitness memory

T2 - the impact of an initial recall attempt on performance in an investigative interview

AU - Hope, Lorraine

AU - Gabbert, Fiona

AU - Fisher, Ronald P.

AU - Jamieson, Kat

PY - 2014/5

Y1 - 2014/5

N2 - Evidence-gathering begins at the scene of an incident. Available witnesses may be asked to provide an account of what happened, either in response to an open request for information or, in some regions, by completing a Self-Administered Interview (SAI©). In both cases, an investigative interview may be conducted at some later date. This study sought to determine the impact of an initial retrieval attempt on a subsequent interview. After exposure to a mock crime, participants completed an SAI© or a free recall (FR), or did not engage in an initial retrieval (Control). One week later, participants were interviewed with a Cognitive Interview. SAI© participants reported more correct information and maintained higher accuracy than FR and Control participants. Consistency analyses revealed that the SAI© was effective because it preserved more of the originally recalled items (Time 1) than did an initial FR, and not because it yielded new recollections at Time 2.

AB - Evidence-gathering begins at the scene of an incident. Available witnesses may be asked to provide an account of what happened, either in response to an open request for information or, in some regions, by completing a Self-Administered Interview (SAI©). In both cases, an investigative interview may be conducted at some later date. This study sought to determine the impact of an initial retrieval attempt on a subsequent interview. After exposure to a mock crime, participants completed an SAI© or a free recall (FR), or did not engage in an initial retrieval (Control). One week later, participants were interviewed with a Cognitive Interview. SAI© participants reported more correct information and maintained higher accuracy than FR and Control participants. Consistency analyses revealed that the SAI© was effective because it preserved more of the originally recalled items (Time 1) than did an initial FR, and not because it yielded new recollections at Time 2.

U2 - 10.1002/acp.2984

DO - 10.1002/acp.2984

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 304

EP - 313

JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0888-4080

IS - 3

ER -