Public and private owners: getting the message across

Christopher Jefferies

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Partners in the INTERREG IIIB project ‘Urban Water’ have adopted a number of different approaches and timescales to rainwater management within their communities. Some, particularly in Holland, have adopted disconnection at source, while others are using regional based approaches. All have a general requirement to reduce flooding, improve water qualities and increase the attractiveness of rivers. Because of the density of population in North West Europe, even small scale improvements to reduce the incremental effects of increasing paved areas are necessary. This paper makes comparisons between the different approaches to water and land management being adopted in the areas of the project partners, and the ways that solutions are being adopted within the context of public and private ownership. Most communities have developed showcase sites which give clear indications of what the possible improvements available are. These improvement projects which are within the local community generally create a good impression of stormwater management for local residents. All of the demonstration sites have multiple benefits which are much more than financial - for example they may include visual improvements and often provide increased space for leisure and amenity purposes. This makes it relatively easy to make a good case for the changes required for effective water management. The ways of convincing public bodies and companies are quite different and are based on regulatory approaches through the planning process. Large scale methods of addressing problems require catchment-wide solutions which are decided at a macro scale and generally require the involvement of regional governments. The public may then be consulted about the details of the solutions required. This paper considers of the issues involved in storm water management at public and private scales. The principles are first discussed and this is followed by key lessons from each of the project partner areas. Finally, conclusions on the different approaches are made.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationFlood risk management and multifunctional land use in river catchments
Subtitle of host publicationconference proceedings, Mainz, Germany, 17th-19th October 2005
EditorsHenk Nijland, Ute Menke
PublisherRijkswaterstaat
Pages323-332
Number of pages10
ISBN (Print)9036957303
StatePublished - 2005
EventFlood Risk Management and Multifunctional Land Use in River Catchments - Mainz, Germany

Conference

ConferenceFlood Risk Management and Multifunctional Land Use in River Catchments
CountryGermany
CityMainz
Period17/10/0519/10/05

Fingerprint

water management
regulatory approach
amenity
planning process
stormwater
rainwater
land management
ownership
flooding
catchment
timescale
water quality
river
water

Cite this

Jefferies, C. (2005). Public and private owners: getting the message across. In H. Nijland, & U. Menke (Eds.), Flood risk management and multifunctional land use in river catchments: conference proceedings, Mainz, Germany, 17th-19th October 2005 (pp. 323-332). Rijkswaterstaat.

Jefferies, Christopher / Public and private owners : getting the message across.

Flood risk management and multifunctional land use in river catchments: conference proceedings, Mainz, Germany, 17th-19th October 2005. ed. / Henk Nijland; Ute Menke. Rijkswaterstaat, 2005. p. 323-332.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

@inbook{5ddf4b294c504490a4676d875317a3cc,
title = "Public and private owners: getting the message across",
abstract = "Partners in the INTERREG IIIB project ‘Urban Water’ have adopted a number of different approaches and timescales to rainwater management within their communities. Some, particularly in Holland, have adopted disconnection at source, while others are using regional based approaches. All have a general requirement to reduce flooding, improve water qualities and increase the attractiveness of rivers. Because of the density of population in North West Europe, even small scale improvements to reduce the incremental effects of increasing paved areas are necessary. This paper makes comparisons between the different approaches to water and land management being adopted in the areas of the project partners, and the ways that solutions are being adopted within the context of public and private ownership. Most communities have developed showcase sites which give clear indications of what the possible improvements available are. These improvement projects which are within the local community generally create a good impression of stormwater management for local residents. All of the demonstration sites have multiple benefits which are much more than financial - for example they may include visual improvements and often provide increased space for leisure and amenity purposes. This makes it relatively easy to make a good case for the changes required for effective water management. The ways of convincing public bodies and companies are quite different and are based on regulatory approaches through the planning process. Large scale methods of addressing problems require catchment-wide solutions which are decided at a macro scale and generally require the involvement of regional governments. The public may then be consulted about the details of the solutions required. This paper considers of the issues involved in storm water management at public and private scales. The principles are first discussed and this is followed by key lessons from each of the project partner areas. Finally, conclusions on the different approaches are made.",
author = "Christopher Jefferies",
year = "2005",
isbn = "9036957303",
pages = "323--332",
editor = "Henk Nijland and Ute Menke",
booktitle = "Flood risk management and multifunctional land use in river catchments",
publisher = "Rijkswaterstaat",

}

Jefferies, C 2005, Public and private owners: getting the message across. in H Nijland & U Menke (eds), Flood risk management and multifunctional land use in river catchments: conference proceedings, Mainz, Germany, 17th-19th October 2005. Rijkswaterstaat, pp. 323-332, Flood Risk Management and Multifunctional Land Use in River Catchments, Mainz, Germany, 17-19 October.

Public and private owners : getting the message across. / Jefferies, Christopher.

Flood risk management and multifunctional land use in river catchments: conference proceedings, Mainz, Germany, 17th-19th October 2005. ed. / Henk Nijland; Ute Menke. Rijkswaterstaat, 2005. p. 323-332.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - CHAP

T1 - Public and private owners

T2 - getting the message across

AU - Jefferies,Christopher

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Partners in the INTERREG IIIB project ‘Urban Water’ have adopted a number of different approaches and timescales to rainwater management within their communities. Some, particularly in Holland, have adopted disconnection at source, while others are using regional based approaches. All have a general requirement to reduce flooding, improve water qualities and increase the attractiveness of rivers. Because of the density of population in North West Europe, even small scale improvements to reduce the incremental effects of increasing paved areas are necessary. This paper makes comparisons between the different approaches to water and land management being adopted in the areas of the project partners, and the ways that solutions are being adopted within the context of public and private ownership. Most communities have developed showcase sites which give clear indications of what the possible improvements available are. These improvement projects which are within the local community generally create a good impression of stormwater management for local residents. All of the demonstration sites have multiple benefits which are much more than financial - for example they may include visual improvements and often provide increased space for leisure and amenity purposes. This makes it relatively easy to make a good case for the changes required for effective water management. The ways of convincing public bodies and companies are quite different and are based on regulatory approaches through the planning process. Large scale methods of addressing problems require catchment-wide solutions which are decided at a macro scale and generally require the involvement of regional governments. The public may then be consulted about the details of the solutions required. This paper considers of the issues involved in storm water management at public and private scales. The principles are first discussed and this is followed by key lessons from each of the project partner areas. Finally, conclusions on the different approaches are made.

AB - Partners in the INTERREG IIIB project ‘Urban Water’ have adopted a number of different approaches and timescales to rainwater management within their communities. Some, particularly in Holland, have adopted disconnection at source, while others are using regional based approaches. All have a general requirement to reduce flooding, improve water qualities and increase the attractiveness of rivers. Because of the density of population in North West Europe, even small scale improvements to reduce the incremental effects of increasing paved areas are necessary. This paper makes comparisons between the different approaches to water and land management being adopted in the areas of the project partners, and the ways that solutions are being adopted within the context of public and private ownership. Most communities have developed showcase sites which give clear indications of what the possible improvements available are. These improvement projects which are within the local community generally create a good impression of stormwater management for local residents. All of the demonstration sites have multiple benefits which are much more than financial - for example they may include visual improvements and often provide increased space for leisure and amenity purposes. This makes it relatively easy to make a good case for the changes required for effective water management. The ways of convincing public bodies and companies are quite different and are based on regulatory approaches through the planning process. Large scale methods of addressing problems require catchment-wide solutions which are decided at a macro scale and generally require the involvement of regional governments. The public may then be consulted about the details of the solutions required. This paper considers of the issues involved in storm water management at public and private scales. The principles are first discussed and this is followed by key lessons from each of the project partner areas. Finally, conclusions on the different approaches are made.

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9036957303

SP - 323

EP - 332

BT - Flood risk management and multifunctional land use in river catchments

PB - Rijkswaterstaat

ER -

Jefferies C. Public and private owners: getting the message across. In Nijland H, Menke U, editors, Flood risk management and multifunctional land use in river catchments: conference proceedings, Mainz, Germany, 17th-19th October 2005. Rijkswaterstaat. 2005. p. 323-332.