Public arguments for and against the establishment of community mental health facilities: implications for mental health practice

Sue Cowan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 9 Citations

Abstract

As the drive towards community care has increased in momentum, organisations involved in the establishment of community mental health facilities have encountered public opposition. It has been argued that this resistance is due to the attitudes held by the public towards people with mental health problems. This paper reports findings from a study of community attitudes towards mentally ill people. Discourse analysis was used to explore people's views about this client group by examining the ways in which they were expressed in letters to the local press and in subsequent discussions and interviews, when arguing for or against a community mental health facility in their community. The findings demonstrate how participants formulate their arguments for and against the location of a new mental health facility in the neighbourhood around particular argumentative topics. Participants deployed a range of argumentative forms and rhetorical devices. The implications of these findings for mental health practice are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-15
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Mental Health
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2002

Fingerprint

Health Facilities
Mental Health
Mentally Ill Persons
Interviews
Equipment and Supplies
Drive

Cite this

Cowan, Sue / Public arguments for and against the establishment of community mental health facilities : implications for mental health practice.

In: Journal of Mental Health, Vol. 11, No. 1, 02.2002, p. 5-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e6169d54b6bb41d0a17f1371ac6ecb2c,
title = "Public arguments for and against the establishment of community mental health facilities: implications for mental health practice",
abstract = "As the drive towards community care has increased in momentum, organisations involved in the establishment of community mental health facilities have encountered public opposition. It has been argued that this resistance is due to the attitudes held by the public towards people with mental health problems. This paper reports findings from a study of community attitudes towards mentally ill people. Discourse analysis was used to explore people's views about this client group by examining the ways in which they were expressed in letters to the local press and in subsequent discussions and interviews, when arguing for or against a community mental health facility in their community. The findings demonstrate how participants formulate their arguments for and against the location of a new mental health facility in the neighbourhood around particular argumentative topics. Participants deployed a range of argumentative forms and rhetorical devices. The implications of these findings for mental health practice are discussed.",
author = "Sue Cowan",
year = "2002",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1080/096382301200041425",
volume = "11",
pages = "5--15",
journal = "Journal of Mental Health",
issn = "0963-8237",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

Public arguments for and against the establishment of community mental health facilities : implications for mental health practice. / Cowan, Sue.

In: Journal of Mental Health, Vol. 11, No. 1, 02.2002, p. 5-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public arguments for and against the establishment of community mental health facilities

T2 - Journal of Mental Health

AU - Cowan,Sue

PY - 2002/2

Y1 - 2002/2

N2 - As the drive towards community care has increased in momentum, organisations involved in the establishment of community mental health facilities have encountered public opposition. It has been argued that this resistance is due to the attitudes held by the public towards people with mental health problems. This paper reports findings from a study of community attitudes towards mentally ill people. Discourse analysis was used to explore people's views about this client group by examining the ways in which they were expressed in letters to the local press and in subsequent discussions and interviews, when arguing for or against a community mental health facility in their community. The findings demonstrate how participants formulate their arguments for and against the location of a new mental health facility in the neighbourhood around particular argumentative topics. Participants deployed a range of argumentative forms and rhetorical devices. The implications of these findings for mental health practice are discussed.

AB - As the drive towards community care has increased in momentum, organisations involved in the establishment of community mental health facilities have encountered public opposition. It has been argued that this resistance is due to the attitudes held by the public towards people with mental health problems. This paper reports findings from a study of community attitudes towards mentally ill people. Discourse analysis was used to explore people's views about this client group by examining the ways in which they were expressed in letters to the local press and in subsequent discussions and interviews, when arguing for or against a community mental health facility in their community. The findings demonstrate how participants formulate their arguments for and against the location of a new mental health facility in the neighbourhood around particular argumentative topics. Participants deployed a range of argumentative forms and rhetorical devices. The implications of these findings for mental health practice are discussed.

U2 - 10.1080/096382301200041425

DO - 10.1080/096382301200041425

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 5

EP - 15

JO - Journal of Mental Health

JF - Journal of Mental Health

SN - 0963-8237

IS - 1

ER -