Religion, secular medicine and utilitarianism: a response to Biggar

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)


    Nigel Biggar has argued that religion ought to be given a seat at the negotiating table of medical ethics. I respond in broadly utilitarian terms, arguing that the flawed empirical basis, lack of rationality and non-universality inherent in religion disqualify it from ethical discourse. I conclude that while it would be unacceptable to attempt to debar religious individuals from the negotiating table, an exclusively secular approach is required for ethical decision making in medicine.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)867-869
    Number of pages3
    JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
    Issue number11
    Early online date19 Jun 2015
    Publication statusPublished - 22 Oct 2015


    Dive into the research topics of 'Religion, secular medicine and utilitarianism: a response to Biggar'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this