Response patterns on the questionnaire on attitudes consistent with sexual offending in groups of sex offenders with intellectual disabilities

William R. Lindsay, Amanda M. Michie, Elaine Whitefield, Victoria Martin, Alan Grieve, Derek Carson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 23 Citations

Abstract

Background  This report employs a recently developed assessment on attitudes consistent with sexual offending [Questionnaire on Attitudes Consistent with Sexual Offences (QACSO)] to compare different groups of sex offenders with intellectual disability.

Method  Two studies are reported each from a different region and each conducted by different individuals. Study 1 compared 12 sex offenders against adults with 12 offenders against children. The six-scale version of the QACSO was administered including rape and attitudes to women, voyeurism, exhibitionism, dating abuse, homosexual assault and offences against children. Study 2 employed three groups of 10 participants each: offenders against adults, exhibitionists and offenders against children. The seven scale version of the QACSO (stalking added) was used. All questionnaires were administered individually.

Results  In both studies, the offenders against adults reported higher levels of attitudes consistent with sexual offending in the area of rape and attitudes to women with medium to large effect sizes and a significant difference in study 1. In both studies, offenders against children reported significantly higher levels of cognitive distortions (large effect sizes) in the area of offences against children. Both differences were in the predicted direction and there were no other significant differences on other sections. In general, all three groups reported higher levels of cognitive distortions than non-offenders.

Conclusions  There would appear to be some specificity particularly for the rape and attitudes to women scale, and the offenders against children scale. The same specificity does not emerge from other scales of the QACSO. The study also lends support to the inclusion of techniques which explore and challenge attitudes consistent with offending both generally and in relation to specific offences.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-53
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Feb 2006

Fingerprint

attitude
offender
questionnaire
child
sexual offense
measurement method
rape
offense
adult
woman
disability
area
effect
voyeurism
stalking
assault
homosexuality
abuse
inclusion
region

Cite this

Lindsay, William R.; Michie, Amanda M.; Whitefield, Elaine; Martin, Victoria; Grieve, Alan; Carson, Derek / Response patterns on the questionnaire on attitudes consistent with sexual offending in groups of sex offenders with intellectual disabilities.

In: Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 19, No. 1, 02.02.2006, p. 47-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2beb75da780c473e98ed4ea20f4b2bdf,
title = "Response patterns on the questionnaire on attitudes consistent with sexual offending in groups of sex offenders with intellectual disabilities",
abstract = "Background  This report employs a recently developed assessment on attitudes consistent with sexual offending [Questionnaire on Attitudes Consistent with Sexual Offences (QACSO)] to compare different groups of sex offenders with intellectual disability.Method  Two studies are reported each from a different region and each conducted by different individuals. Study 1 compared 12 sex offenders against adults with 12 offenders against children. The six-scale version of the QACSO was administered including rape and attitudes to women, voyeurism, exhibitionism, dating abuse, homosexual assault and offences against children. Study 2 employed three groups of 10 participants each: offenders against adults, exhibitionists and offenders against children. The seven scale version of the QACSO (stalking added) was used. All questionnaires were administered individually.Results  In both studies, the offenders against adults reported higher levels of attitudes consistent with sexual offending in the area of rape and attitudes to women with medium to large effect sizes and a significant difference in study 1. In both studies, offenders against children reported significantly higher levels of cognitive distortions (large effect sizes) in the area of offences against children. Both differences were in the predicted direction and there were no other significant differences on other sections. In general, all three groups reported higher levels of cognitive distortions than non-offenders.Conclusions  There would appear to be some specificity particularly for the rape and attitudes to women scale, and the offenders against children scale. The same specificity does not emerge from other scales of the QACSO. The study also lends support to the inclusion of techniques which explore and challenge attitudes consistent with offending both generally and in relation to specific offences.",
author = "Lindsay, {William R.} and Michie, {Amanda M.} and Elaine Whitefield and Victoria Martin and Alan Grieve and Derek Carson",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-3148.2005.00288.x",
volume = "19",
pages = "47--53",
journal = "Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities",
number = "1",

}

Response patterns on the questionnaire on attitudes consistent with sexual offending in groups of sex offenders with intellectual disabilities. / Lindsay, William R.; Michie, Amanda M.; Whitefield, Elaine; Martin, Victoria; Grieve, Alan; Carson, Derek.

In: Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 19, No. 1, 02.02.2006, p. 47-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response patterns on the questionnaire on attitudes consistent with sexual offending in groups of sex offenders with intellectual disabilities

AU - Lindsay,William R.

AU - Michie,Amanda M.

AU - Whitefield,Elaine

AU - Martin,Victoria

AU - Grieve,Alan

AU - Carson,Derek

PY - 2006/2/2

Y1 - 2006/2/2

N2 - Background  This report employs a recently developed assessment on attitudes consistent with sexual offending [Questionnaire on Attitudes Consistent with Sexual Offences (QACSO)] to compare different groups of sex offenders with intellectual disability.Method  Two studies are reported each from a different region and each conducted by different individuals. Study 1 compared 12 sex offenders against adults with 12 offenders against children. The six-scale version of the QACSO was administered including rape and attitudes to women, voyeurism, exhibitionism, dating abuse, homosexual assault and offences against children. Study 2 employed three groups of 10 participants each: offenders against adults, exhibitionists and offenders against children. The seven scale version of the QACSO (stalking added) was used. All questionnaires were administered individually.Results  In both studies, the offenders against adults reported higher levels of attitudes consistent with sexual offending in the area of rape and attitudes to women with medium to large effect sizes and a significant difference in study 1. In both studies, offenders against children reported significantly higher levels of cognitive distortions (large effect sizes) in the area of offences against children. Both differences were in the predicted direction and there were no other significant differences on other sections. In general, all three groups reported higher levels of cognitive distortions than non-offenders.Conclusions  There would appear to be some specificity particularly for the rape and attitudes to women scale, and the offenders against children scale. The same specificity does not emerge from other scales of the QACSO. The study also lends support to the inclusion of techniques which explore and challenge attitudes consistent with offending both generally and in relation to specific offences.

AB - Background  This report employs a recently developed assessment on attitudes consistent with sexual offending [Questionnaire on Attitudes Consistent with Sexual Offences (QACSO)] to compare different groups of sex offenders with intellectual disability.Method  Two studies are reported each from a different region and each conducted by different individuals. Study 1 compared 12 sex offenders against adults with 12 offenders against children. The six-scale version of the QACSO was administered including rape and attitudes to women, voyeurism, exhibitionism, dating abuse, homosexual assault and offences against children. Study 2 employed three groups of 10 participants each: offenders against adults, exhibitionists and offenders against children. The seven scale version of the QACSO (stalking added) was used. All questionnaires were administered individually.Results  In both studies, the offenders against adults reported higher levels of attitudes consistent with sexual offending in the area of rape and attitudes to women with medium to large effect sizes and a significant difference in study 1. In both studies, offenders against children reported significantly higher levels of cognitive distortions (large effect sizes) in the area of offences against children. Both differences were in the predicted direction and there were no other significant differences on other sections. In general, all three groups reported higher levels of cognitive distortions than non-offenders.Conclusions  There would appear to be some specificity particularly for the rape and attitudes to women scale, and the offenders against children scale. The same specificity does not emerge from other scales of the QACSO. The study also lends support to the inclusion of techniques which explore and challenge attitudes consistent with offending both generally and in relation to specific offences.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2005.00288.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2005.00288.x

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 47

EP - 53

JO - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

T2 - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

JF - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

IS - 1

ER -