Revealing the cyber security non-compliance “attribution gulf”

Jacques Ophoff, Karen Renaud

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Non-compliance is a well-known issue in the field of cyber security. Non-compliance usually manifests in an individual’s sins of omission or commission, and it is easy to conclude that the problem is attributable to their personal flawed decision making. However, the individual’s decision not to comply is likely also to be influenced by a range of environmental and contextual factors. Bordieu, for example, suggests that personal habitus influences decisions. We identified a wide range of possible explanations for non-compliance from the research literature and classified these, finding that a number of the identified factors were indeed habitus related. We then used Q-methodology to determine which of these non-compliance explanations aligned with public attributions of non-compliance causatives. We discovered an “attribution gulf”, with popular opinion attributing non-compliance primarily to individual failings or ignorance. The existence of this attribution gap means that those designing cyber security interventions are likely to neglect the influence of habitus on choices and decisions. We need to broaden our focus if non-compliance is to be reduced.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Place of PublicationHonolulu, HI
PublisherUniversity of Hawaii at Manoa
Pages4557-4566
Number of pages10
ISBN (Print)9780998133140
Publication statusPublished - 5 Jan 2021
EventHawaii International Conference on System Sciences - Virtual venue, United States
Duration: 4 Jan 20218 Jan 2021
Conference number: 54th
https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/72112

Conference

ConferenceHawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Abbreviated titleHICSS-54
CountryUnited States
Period4/01/218/01/21
Internet address

Cite this