Segmenting the body into parts: evidence from biases in tactile perception

Frédérique de Vignemont, Asifa Majid Majid, Corinne Jola, Patrick Haggard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How do we individuate body parts? Here, we investigated the effect of body segmentation between hand and arm in tactile and visual perception. In a first experiment, we showed that two tactile stimuli felt farther away when they were applied across the wrist than when they were applied within a single body part (palm or forearm), indicating a “category boundary effect”. In the following experiments, we excluded two hypotheses, which attributed tactile segmentation to other, nontactile factors. In Experiment 2, we showed that the boundary effect does not arise from motor cues. The effect was reduced during a motor task involving flexion and extension movements of the wrist joint. Action brings body parts together into functional units, instead of pulling them apart. In Experiments 3 and 4, we showed that the effect does not arise from perceptual cues of visual discontinuities. We did not find any segmentation effect for the visual percept of the body in Experiment 3, nor for a neutral shape in Experiment 4. We suggest that the mental representation of the body is structured in categorical body parts delineated by joints, and that this categorical representation modulates tactile spatial perception.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)500-512
Number of pages13
JournalThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Volume62
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Touch Perception
Human Body
Touch
Cues
Wrist Joint
Visual Perception
Body Image
Wrist
Forearm
Arm
Hand
Joints

Cite this

de Vignemont, Frédérique ; Majid, Asifa Majid ; Jola, Corinne ; Haggard, Patrick. / Segmenting the body into parts : evidence from biases in tactile perception. In: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2009 ; Vol. 62, No. 3. pp. 500-512.
@article{5b5a9f8d5e514d5d939a87fd7b191558,
title = "Segmenting the body into parts: evidence from biases in tactile perception",
abstract = "How do we individuate body parts? Here, we investigated the effect of body segmentation between hand and arm in tactile and visual perception. In a first experiment, we showed that two tactile stimuli felt farther away when they were applied across the wrist than when they were applied within a single body part (palm or forearm), indicating a “category boundary effect”. In the following experiments, we excluded two hypotheses, which attributed tactile segmentation to other, nontactile factors. In Experiment 2, we showed that the boundary effect does not arise from motor cues. The effect was reduced during a motor task involving flexion and extension movements of the wrist joint. Action brings body parts together into functional units, instead of pulling them apart. In Experiments 3 and 4, we showed that the effect does not arise from perceptual cues of visual discontinuities. We did not find any segmentation effect for the visual percept of the body in Experiment 3, nor for a neutral shape in Experiment 4. We suggest that the mental representation of the body is structured in categorical body parts delineated by joints, and that this categorical representation modulates tactile spatial perception.",
author = "{de Vignemont}, Fr{\'e}d{\'e}rique and Majid, {Asifa Majid} and Corinne Jola and Patrick Haggard",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/17470210802000802",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "500--512",
journal = "The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology",
number = "3",

}

Segmenting the body into parts : evidence from biases in tactile perception. / de Vignemont, Frédérique; Majid, Asifa Majid; Jola, Corinne; Haggard, Patrick.

In: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 62, No. 3, 2009, p. 500-512.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Segmenting the body into parts

T2 - evidence from biases in tactile perception

AU - de Vignemont, Frédérique

AU - Majid, Asifa Majid

AU - Jola, Corinne

AU - Haggard, Patrick

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - How do we individuate body parts? Here, we investigated the effect of body segmentation between hand and arm in tactile and visual perception. In a first experiment, we showed that two tactile stimuli felt farther away when they were applied across the wrist than when they were applied within a single body part (palm or forearm), indicating a “category boundary effect”. In the following experiments, we excluded two hypotheses, which attributed tactile segmentation to other, nontactile factors. In Experiment 2, we showed that the boundary effect does not arise from motor cues. The effect was reduced during a motor task involving flexion and extension movements of the wrist joint. Action brings body parts together into functional units, instead of pulling them apart. In Experiments 3 and 4, we showed that the effect does not arise from perceptual cues of visual discontinuities. We did not find any segmentation effect for the visual percept of the body in Experiment 3, nor for a neutral shape in Experiment 4. We suggest that the mental representation of the body is structured in categorical body parts delineated by joints, and that this categorical representation modulates tactile spatial perception.

AB - How do we individuate body parts? Here, we investigated the effect of body segmentation between hand and arm in tactile and visual perception. In a first experiment, we showed that two tactile stimuli felt farther away when they were applied across the wrist than when they were applied within a single body part (palm or forearm), indicating a “category boundary effect”. In the following experiments, we excluded two hypotheses, which attributed tactile segmentation to other, nontactile factors. In Experiment 2, we showed that the boundary effect does not arise from motor cues. The effect was reduced during a motor task involving flexion and extension movements of the wrist joint. Action brings body parts together into functional units, instead of pulling them apart. In Experiments 3 and 4, we showed that the effect does not arise from perceptual cues of visual discontinuities. We did not find any segmentation effect for the visual percept of the body in Experiment 3, nor for a neutral shape in Experiment 4. We suggest that the mental representation of the body is structured in categorical body parts delineated by joints, and that this categorical representation modulates tactile spatial perception.

U2 - 10.1080/17470210802000802

DO - 10.1080/17470210802000802

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 500

EP - 512

JO - The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

JF - The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

IS - 3

ER -