Simple but effective criteria: rethinking excellent qualitative research

Majd Megheirkouni, James Moir

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    9 Citations (Scopus)
    2297 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Despite unremitting efforts to develop quality criteria of qualitative research, traditional criteria for the trustworthiness of qualitative results are still predominant in interpretive and naturalistic inquiries including Ph.D. studies. This work does not aim to replace the existing quality criteria but rather to update and simplify those criteria to include credibility, confirmability, and representativeness. The purpose of the study is to offer a review of existing criteria and strategies for qualitative research and to suggest simple criteria and strategies that will win the confidence of the academic community and augment the trustworthiness of qualitative research.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number11
    Pages (from-to)848-864
    Number of pages17
    JournalThe Qualitative Report
    Volume28
    Issue number3
    Early online date18 Mar 2023
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 18 Mar 2023

    Keywords

    • Quality
    • Qualitative
    • Criteria
    • Revision
    • Research

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Simple but effective criteria: rethinking excellent qualitative research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this