Single-cell analysis of [Ca2+]i signalling in sub-fertile men: characteristics and relation to fertilization outcome

Mark C. Kelly, Sean G. Brown, Sarah M. Costello, Mythili Ramalingam, Ellen Drew, Stephen J. Publicover, Christopher L.R. Barratt*, Sarah Martins da Silva

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Citations (Scopus)
    13 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    STUDY QUESTION
    What are the characteristics of progesterone-induced (CatSper-mediated) single cell [Ca2+]i signals in spermatozoa from sub-fertile men and how do they relate to fertilizing ability?

    SUMMARY ANSWER
    Single cell analysis of progesterone-induced (CatSper-mediated) [Ca2+]i showed that reduced progesterone-sensitivity is a common feature of sperm from sub-fertile patients and is correlated with fertilization rate.

    WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
    Stimulation with progesterone is a widely used method for assessing [Ca2+]i mobilization by activation of CatSper in human spermatozoa. Although data are limited, sperm population studies have indicated an association of poor [Ca2+]i response to progesterone with reduced fertilization ability.

    STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
    This was a cohort study using semen samples from 21 donors and 101 patients attending the assisted conception unit at Ninewells Hospital Dundee who were undergoing ART treatment. Patients were recruited from January 2016 to June 2017.

    PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
    Semen donors and patients were recruited in accordance with local ethics approval (13/ES/0091) from the East of Scotland Research Ethics Service (EoSRES) REC1. [Ca2+]i responses were examined by single cell imaging and motility parameters assessed by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA).

    MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
    For analysis, patient samples were divided into three groups IVF(+ve) (successful fertilization; 62 samples), IVF-FF (failed fertilization; eight samples) and ICSI (21 samples). A further 10 IVF samples showed large, spontaneous [Ca2+]i oscillations and responses to progesterone could not be analysed. All patient samples loaded with the [Ca2+]i-indicator fluo4 responded to progesterone stimulation with a biphasic increase in fluorescence (transient followed by plateau) which resembled that seen in progesterone-stimulated donor samples. The mean normalized response (progesterone-induced increase in fluorescence normalized to resting level) was significantly smaller in IVF-FF and ICSI patient groups than in donors. All samples were further analysed by plotting, for each cell, the relationship between resting fluorescence intensity and the progesterone-induced fluorescence increment. In donor samples these plots overlaid closely and had a gradient of ≈ 2 and plots for most IVF(+ve) samples closely resembled the donor distribution. However, in a subset (≈ 10%) of IVF(+ve) samples, 3/8 IVF-FF samples and one-third of ICSI samples the gradient of the plot was significantly lower, indicating that the response to progesterone of the cells in these samples was abnormally small. Examination of the relationship between gradient (regression coefficient of the plot) in IVF samples and fertilization rate showed a positive correlation. In IVF-FF and ICSI groups, the proportion of cells in which a response to progesterone could be detected was significantly lower than in donors and IVF (+ve) patients. Approximately 20% of cells in donor, IVF(+ve) and ICSI samples generated [Ca2+]i oscillations when challenged with progesterone but in IVF-FF samples only ≈ 10% of cells generated oscillations and there was a significantly greater proportion of samples where no oscillations were observed. Levels of hyperactivated motility were lower in IVF(+ve) and IVF-FF groups compared to controls, IVF-FF also having lower levels than IVF(+ve).

    LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
    This is an in vitro study and caution must be taken when extrapolating these results in vivo.

    WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
    This study reveals important details of impaired [Ca2+]i signalling in sperm from sub-fertile men that cannot be detected in population studies.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numberdey096
    Pages (from-to)1023-1033
    Number of pages11
    JournalHuman Reproduction
    Volume33
    Issue number6
    Early online date25 Apr 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018

    Fingerprint

    Single-Cell Analysis
    Fertilization
    Progesterone
    Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injections
    Tissue Donors
    Spermatozoa
    Fluorescence
    Research Ethics
    Scotland
    Semen
    Ethics
    Population

    Cite this

    Kelly, M. C., Brown, S. G., Costello, S. M., Ramalingam, M., Drew, E., Publicover, S. J., ... Martins da Silva, S. (2018). Single-cell analysis of [Ca2+]i signalling in sub-fertile men: characteristics and relation to fertilization outcome. Human Reproduction, 33(6), 1023-1033. [dey096]. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey096
    Kelly, Mark C. ; Brown, Sean G. ; Costello, Sarah M. ; Ramalingam, Mythili ; Drew, Ellen ; Publicover, Stephen J. ; Barratt, Christopher L.R. ; Martins da Silva, Sarah. / Single-cell analysis of [Ca2+]i signalling in sub-fertile men : characteristics and relation to fertilization outcome. In: Human Reproduction. 2018 ; Vol. 33, No. 6. pp. 1023-1033.
    @article{4faa6c8182034601830127947e5a27c5,
    title = "Single-cell analysis of [Ca2+]i signalling in sub-fertile men: characteristics and relation to fertilization outcome",
    abstract = "STUDY QUESTIONWhat are the characteristics of progesterone-induced (CatSper-mediated) single cell [Ca2+]i signals in spermatozoa from sub-fertile men and how do they relate to fertilizing ability?SUMMARY ANSWERSingle cell analysis of progesterone-induced (CatSper-mediated) [Ca2+]i showed that reduced progesterone-sensitivity is a common feature of sperm from sub-fertile patients and is correlated with fertilization rate.WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADYStimulation with progesterone is a widely used method for assessing [Ca2+]i mobilization by activation of CatSper in human spermatozoa. Although data are limited, sperm population studies have indicated an association of poor [Ca2+]i response to progesterone with reduced fertilization ability.STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATIONThis was a cohort study using semen samples from 21 donors and 101 patients attending the assisted conception unit at Ninewells Hospital Dundee who were undergoing ART treatment. Patients were recruited from January 2016 to June 2017.PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODSSemen donors and patients were recruited in accordance with local ethics approval (13/ES/0091) from the East of Scotland Research Ethics Service (EoSRES) REC1. [Ca2+]i responses were examined by single cell imaging and motility parameters assessed by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA).MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCEFor analysis, patient samples were divided into three groups IVF(+ve) (successful fertilization; 62 samples), IVF-FF (failed fertilization; eight samples) and ICSI (21 samples). A further 10 IVF samples showed large, spontaneous [Ca2+]i oscillations and responses to progesterone could not be analysed. All patient samples loaded with the [Ca2+]i-indicator fluo4 responded to progesterone stimulation with a biphasic increase in fluorescence (transient followed by plateau) which resembled that seen in progesterone-stimulated donor samples. The mean normalized response (progesterone-induced increase in fluorescence normalized to resting level) was significantly smaller in IVF-FF and ICSI patient groups than in donors. All samples were further analysed by plotting, for each cell, the relationship between resting fluorescence intensity and the progesterone-induced fluorescence increment. In donor samples these plots overlaid closely and had a gradient of ≈ 2 and plots for most IVF(+ve) samples closely resembled the donor distribution. However, in a subset (≈ 10{\%}) of IVF(+ve) samples, 3/8 IVF-FF samples and one-third of ICSI samples the gradient of the plot was significantly lower, indicating that the response to progesterone of the cells in these samples was abnormally small. Examination of the relationship between gradient (regression coefficient of the plot) in IVF samples and fertilization rate showed a positive correlation. In IVF-FF and ICSI groups, the proportion of cells in which a response to progesterone could be detected was significantly lower than in donors and IVF (+ve) patients. Approximately 20{\%} of cells in donor, IVF(+ve) and ICSI samples generated [Ca2+]i oscillations when challenged with progesterone but in IVF-FF samples only ≈ 10{\%} of cells generated oscillations and there was a significantly greater proportion of samples where no oscillations were observed. Levels of hyperactivated motility were lower in IVF(+ve) and IVF-FF groups compared to controls, IVF-FF also having lower levels than IVF(+ve).LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTIONThis is an in vitro study and caution must be taken when extrapolating these results in vivo.WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGSThis study reveals important details of impaired [Ca2+]i signalling in sperm from sub-fertile men that cannot be detected in population studies.",
    author = "Kelly, {Mark C.} and Brown, {Sean G.} and Costello, {Sarah M.} and Mythili Ramalingam and Ellen Drew and Publicover, {Stephen J.} and Barratt, {Christopher L.R.} and {Martins da Silva}, Sarah",
    year = "2018",
    month = "6",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1093/humrep/dey096",
    language = "English",
    volume = "33",
    pages = "1023--1033",
    journal = "Human Reproduction",
    issn = "0268-1161",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "6",

    }

    Kelly, MC, Brown, SG, Costello, SM, Ramalingam, M, Drew, E, Publicover, SJ, Barratt, CLR & Martins da Silva, S 2018, 'Single-cell analysis of [Ca2+]i signalling in sub-fertile men: characteristics and relation to fertilization outcome', Human Reproduction, vol. 33, no. 6, dey096, pp. 1023-1033. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey096

    Single-cell analysis of [Ca2+]i signalling in sub-fertile men : characteristics and relation to fertilization outcome. / Kelly, Mark C.; Brown, Sean G.; Costello, Sarah M.; Ramalingam, Mythili; Drew, Ellen; Publicover, Stephen J.; Barratt, Christopher L.R.; Martins da Silva, Sarah.

    In: Human Reproduction, Vol. 33, No. 6, dey096, 01.06.2018, p. 1023-1033.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Single-cell analysis of [Ca2+]i signalling in sub-fertile men

    T2 - characteristics and relation to fertilization outcome

    AU - Kelly, Mark C.

    AU - Brown, Sean G.

    AU - Costello, Sarah M.

    AU - Ramalingam, Mythili

    AU - Drew, Ellen

    AU - Publicover, Stephen J.

    AU - Barratt, Christopher L.R.

    AU - Martins da Silva, Sarah

    PY - 2018/6/1

    Y1 - 2018/6/1

    N2 - STUDY QUESTIONWhat are the characteristics of progesterone-induced (CatSper-mediated) single cell [Ca2+]i signals in spermatozoa from sub-fertile men and how do they relate to fertilizing ability?SUMMARY ANSWERSingle cell analysis of progesterone-induced (CatSper-mediated) [Ca2+]i showed that reduced progesterone-sensitivity is a common feature of sperm from sub-fertile patients and is correlated with fertilization rate.WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADYStimulation with progesterone is a widely used method for assessing [Ca2+]i mobilization by activation of CatSper in human spermatozoa. Although data are limited, sperm population studies have indicated an association of poor [Ca2+]i response to progesterone with reduced fertilization ability.STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATIONThis was a cohort study using semen samples from 21 donors and 101 patients attending the assisted conception unit at Ninewells Hospital Dundee who were undergoing ART treatment. Patients were recruited from January 2016 to June 2017.PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODSSemen donors and patients were recruited in accordance with local ethics approval (13/ES/0091) from the East of Scotland Research Ethics Service (EoSRES) REC1. [Ca2+]i responses were examined by single cell imaging and motility parameters assessed by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA).MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCEFor analysis, patient samples were divided into three groups IVF(+ve) (successful fertilization; 62 samples), IVF-FF (failed fertilization; eight samples) and ICSI (21 samples). A further 10 IVF samples showed large, spontaneous [Ca2+]i oscillations and responses to progesterone could not be analysed. All patient samples loaded with the [Ca2+]i-indicator fluo4 responded to progesterone stimulation with a biphasic increase in fluorescence (transient followed by plateau) which resembled that seen in progesterone-stimulated donor samples. The mean normalized response (progesterone-induced increase in fluorescence normalized to resting level) was significantly smaller in IVF-FF and ICSI patient groups than in donors. All samples were further analysed by plotting, for each cell, the relationship between resting fluorescence intensity and the progesterone-induced fluorescence increment. In donor samples these plots overlaid closely and had a gradient of ≈ 2 and plots for most IVF(+ve) samples closely resembled the donor distribution. However, in a subset (≈ 10%) of IVF(+ve) samples, 3/8 IVF-FF samples and one-third of ICSI samples the gradient of the plot was significantly lower, indicating that the response to progesterone of the cells in these samples was abnormally small. Examination of the relationship between gradient (regression coefficient of the plot) in IVF samples and fertilization rate showed a positive correlation. In IVF-FF and ICSI groups, the proportion of cells in which a response to progesterone could be detected was significantly lower than in donors and IVF (+ve) patients. Approximately 20% of cells in donor, IVF(+ve) and ICSI samples generated [Ca2+]i oscillations when challenged with progesterone but in IVF-FF samples only ≈ 10% of cells generated oscillations and there was a significantly greater proportion of samples where no oscillations were observed. Levels of hyperactivated motility were lower in IVF(+ve) and IVF-FF groups compared to controls, IVF-FF also having lower levels than IVF(+ve).LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTIONThis is an in vitro study and caution must be taken when extrapolating these results in vivo.WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGSThis study reveals important details of impaired [Ca2+]i signalling in sperm from sub-fertile men that cannot be detected in population studies.

    AB - STUDY QUESTIONWhat are the characteristics of progesterone-induced (CatSper-mediated) single cell [Ca2+]i signals in spermatozoa from sub-fertile men and how do they relate to fertilizing ability?SUMMARY ANSWERSingle cell analysis of progesterone-induced (CatSper-mediated) [Ca2+]i showed that reduced progesterone-sensitivity is a common feature of sperm from sub-fertile patients and is correlated with fertilization rate.WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADYStimulation with progesterone is a widely used method for assessing [Ca2+]i mobilization by activation of CatSper in human spermatozoa. Although data are limited, sperm population studies have indicated an association of poor [Ca2+]i response to progesterone with reduced fertilization ability.STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATIONThis was a cohort study using semen samples from 21 donors and 101 patients attending the assisted conception unit at Ninewells Hospital Dundee who were undergoing ART treatment. Patients were recruited from January 2016 to June 2017.PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODSSemen donors and patients were recruited in accordance with local ethics approval (13/ES/0091) from the East of Scotland Research Ethics Service (EoSRES) REC1. [Ca2+]i responses were examined by single cell imaging and motility parameters assessed by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA).MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCEFor analysis, patient samples were divided into three groups IVF(+ve) (successful fertilization; 62 samples), IVF-FF (failed fertilization; eight samples) and ICSI (21 samples). A further 10 IVF samples showed large, spontaneous [Ca2+]i oscillations and responses to progesterone could not be analysed. All patient samples loaded with the [Ca2+]i-indicator fluo4 responded to progesterone stimulation with a biphasic increase in fluorescence (transient followed by plateau) which resembled that seen in progesterone-stimulated donor samples. The mean normalized response (progesterone-induced increase in fluorescence normalized to resting level) was significantly smaller in IVF-FF and ICSI patient groups than in donors. All samples were further analysed by plotting, for each cell, the relationship between resting fluorescence intensity and the progesterone-induced fluorescence increment. In donor samples these plots overlaid closely and had a gradient of ≈ 2 and plots for most IVF(+ve) samples closely resembled the donor distribution. However, in a subset (≈ 10%) of IVF(+ve) samples, 3/8 IVF-FF samples and one-third of ICSI samples the gradient of the plot was significantly lower, indicating that the response to progesterone of the cells in these samples was abnormally small. Examination of the relationship between gradient (regression coefficient of the plot) in IVF samples and fertilization rate showed a positive correlation. In IVF-FF and ICSI groups, the proportion of cells in which a response to progesterone could be detected was significantly lower than in donors and IVF (+ve) patients. Approximately 20% of cells in donor, IVF(+ve) and ICSI samples generated [Ca2+]i oscillations when challenged with progesterone but in IVF-FF samples only ≈ 10% of cells generated oscillations and there was a significantly greater proportion of samples where no oscillations were observed. Levels of hyperactivated motility were lower in IVF(+ve) and IVF-FF groups compared to controls, IVF-FF also having lower levels than IVF(+ve).LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTIONThis is an in vitro study and caution must be taken when extrapolating these results in vivo.WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGSThis study reveals important details of impaired [Ca2+]i signalling in sperm from sub-fertile men that cannot be detected in population studies.

    U2 - 10.1093/humrep/dey096

    DO - 10.1093/humrep/dey096

    M3 - Article

    VL - 33

    SP - 1023

    EP - 1033

    JO - Human Reproduction

    JF - Human Reproduction

    SN - 0268-1161

    IS - 6

    M1 - dey096

    ER -