Social support influences preferences for feminine facial cues in potential social partners

Christopher D. Watkins, Lisa M. DeBruine, Anthony C. Little, Benedict C. Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)
37 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Most previous studies of individual differences in women’s and men’s preferences for sexually dimorphic physical characteristics have focused on the importance of mating-related factors for judgments of opposite-sex individuals. Although studies have suggested that people may show stronger preferences for feminine individuals of both sexes under conditions where social support may be at a premium (e.g., during phases of the menstrual cycle where raised progesterone prepares women’s bodies for pregnancy), these studies have not demonstrated that perceptions of available social support directly influence femininity preferences. Here we found that (1) women and men randomly allocated to low social support priming conditions demonstrated stronger preferences for feminine shape cues in own- and opposite-sex faces than did individuals randomly allocated to high social support priming conditions and (2) that people perceived men and women displaying feminine characteristics as more likely to provide them with high-quality social support than those displaying relatively masculine characteristics. Together, these findings suggest that social support influences face preferences directly, potentially implicating facultative responses whereby people increase their preferences for pro-social individuals under conditions of low social support.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)340-347
Number of pages8
JournalExperimental Psychology
Volume59
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Social Support
Cues
Mating Factor
Femininity
Menstrual Cycle
Individuality
Progesterone
Pregnancy

Cite this

Watkins, Christopher D. ; DeBruine, Lisa M. ; Little, Anthony C. ; Jones, Benedict C. / Social support influences preferences for feminine facial cues in potential social partners. In: Experimental Psychology. 2012 ; Vol. 59, No. 6. pp. 340-347.
@article{b2d2b09b87884643b18cc998595618c6,
title = "Social support influences preferences for feminine facial cues in potential social partners",
abstract = "Most previous studies of individual differences in women’s and men’s preferences for sexually dimorphic physical characteristics have focused on the importance of mating-related factors for judgments of opposite-sex individuals. Although studies have suggested that people may show stronger preferences for feminine individuals of both sexes under conditions where social support may be at a premium (e.g., during phases of the menstrual cycle where raised progesterone prepares women’s bodies for pregnancy), these studies have not demonstrated that perceptions of available social support directly influence femininity preferences. Here we found that (1) women and men randomly allocated to low social support priming conditions demonstrated stronger preferences for feminine shape cues in own- and opposite-sex faces than did individuals randomly allocated to high social support priming conditions and (2) that people perceived men and women displaying feminine characteristics as more likely to provide them with high-quality social support than those displaying relatively masculine characteristics. Together, these findings suggest that social support influences face preferences directly, potentially implicating facultative responses whereby people increase their preferences for pro-social individuals under conditions of low social support.",
author = "Watkins, {Christopher D.} and DeBruine, {Lisa M.} and Little, {Anthony C.} and Jones, {Benedict C.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1027/1618-3169/a000162",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "340--347",
journal = "Experimental Psychology",
issn = "1618-3169",
publisher = "Hogrefe Publishing",
number = "6",

}

Social support influences preferences for feminine facial cues in potential social partners. / Watkins, Christopher D.; DeBruine, Lisa M.; Little, Anthony C.; Jones, Benedict C.

In: Experimental Psychology, Vol. 59, No. 6, 2012, p. 340-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social support influences preferences for feminine facial cues in potential social partners

AU - Watkins, Christopher D.

AU - DeBruine, Lisa M.

AU - Little, Anthony C.

AU - Jones, Benedict C.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Most previous studies of individual differences in women’s and men’s preferences for sexually dimorphic physical characteristics have focused on the importance of mating-related factors for judgments of opposite-sex individuals. Although studies have suggested that people may show stronger preferences for feminine individuals of both sexes under conditions where social support may be at a premium (e.g., during phases of the menstrual cycle where raised progesterone prepares women’s bodies for pregnancy), these studies have not demonstrated that perceptions of available social support directly influence femininity preferences. Here we found that (1) women and men randomly allocated to low social support priming conditions demonstrated stronger preferences for feminine shape cues in own- and opposite-sex faces than did individuals randomly allocated to high social support priming conditions and (2) that people perceived men and women displaying feminine characteristics as more likely to provide them with high-quality social support than those displaying relatively masculine characteristics. Together, these findings suggest that social support influences face preferences directly, potentially implicating facultative responses whereby people increase their preferences for pro-social individuals under conditions of low social support.

AB - Most previous studies of individual differences in women’s and men’s preferences for sexually dimorphic physical characteristics have focused on the importance of mating-related factors for judgments of opposite-sex individuals. Although studies have suggested that people may show stronger preferences for feminine individuals of both sexes under conditions where social support may be at a premium (e.g., during phases of the menstrual cycle where raised progesterone prepares women’s bodies for pregnancy), these studies have not demonstrated that perceptions of available social support directly influence femininity preferences. Here we found that (1) women and men randomly allocated to low social support priming conditions demonstrated stronger preferences for feminine shape cues in own- and opposite-sex faces than did individuals randomly allocated to high social support priming conditions and (2) that people perceived men and women displaying feminine characteristics as more likely to provide them with high-quality social support than those displaying relatively masculine characteristics. Together, these findings suggest that social support influences face preferences directly, potentially implicating facultative responses whereby people increase their preferences for pro-social individuals under conditions of low social support.

U2 - 10.1027/1618-3169/a000162

DO - 10.1027/1618-3169/a000162

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 340

EP - 347

JO - Experimental Psychology

JF - Experimental Psychology

SN - 1618-3169

IS - 6

ER -