Abstract
With DNA evidence, so‐called match probabilities are potentially misleading if they are used to answer questions that they are not designed to answer. Are we interested in who is the source of the detected DNA, or are we interested in whether a particular alleged activity occurred? Graham Jackson and Alex Biedermann explore this issue.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 36-39 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Significance |
Volume | 16 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 1 Apr 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2019 |