“Source” or “activity”: what is the level of issue in a criminal trial?

Graham Jackson; Alex Biedermann

doi:10.1111/j.1740-9713.2019.01253.x

“Source” or “activity”: what is the level of issue in a criminal trial?

Graham Jackson, Alex Biedermann

Research output: Contribution to journal › Special issue › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With DNA evidence, so‐called match probabilities are potentially misleading if they are used to answer questions that they are not designed to answer. Are we interested in who is the source of the detected DNA, or are we interested in whether a particular alleged activity occurred? Graham Jackson and Alex Biedermann explore this issue.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	36-39
Number of pages	4
Journal	Significance
Volume	16
Issue number	2
Early online date	1 Apr 2019
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2019.01253.x
Publication status	Published - 1 Apr 2019

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1740-9713.2019.01253.x

Cite this

@article{ebe3d7f4c0d846ada601ad2ad4425192,

title = "“Source” or “activity”: what is the level of issue in a criminal trial?",

abstract = "With DNA evidence, so‐called match probabilities are potentially misleading if they are used to answer questions that they are not designed to answer. Are we interested in who is the source of the detected DNA, or are we interested in whether a particular alleged activity occurred? Graham Jackson and Alex Biedermann explore this issue.",

author = "Graham Jackson and Alex Biedermann",

year = "2019",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/j.1740-9713.2019.01253.x",

language = "English",

volume = "16",

pages = "36--39",

journal = "Significance",

issn = "1740-9705",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Source” or “activity”

T2 - what is the level of issue in a criminal trial?

AU - Jackson, Graham

AU - Biedermann, Alex

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - With DNA evidence, so‐called match probabilities are potentially misleading if they are used to answer questions that they are not designed to answer. Are we interested in who is the source of the detected DNA, or are we interested in whether a particular alleged activity occurred? Graham Jackson and Alex Biedermann explore this issue.

AB - With DNA evidence, so‐called match probabilities are potentially misleading if they are used to answer questions that they are not designed to answer. Are we interested in who is the source of the detected DNA, or are we interested in whether a particular alleged activity occurred? Graham Jackson and Alex Biedermann explore this issue.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1740-9713.2019.01253.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1740-9713.2019.01253.x

M3 - Special issue

AN - SCOPUS:85063738283

VL - 16

SP - 36

EP - 39

JO - Significance

JF - Significance

SN - 1740-9705

IS - 2

ER -

“Source” or “activity”: what is the level of issue in a criminal trial?

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this