Speaker emotion can affect ambiguity production

Vera Kempe, Melissa Rookes, Laura Swarbrigg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
34 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Does speaker emotion affect degree of ambiguity in referring expressions? We used referential communication tasks preceded by mood induction to examine whether positive emotional valence may be linked to ambiguity of referring expressions. In Experiment 1, participants had to identify sequences of objects with homophonic labels (e.g., the animal bat, a baseball bat) for hypothetical addressees. This required modification of the homophones. Happy speakers were less likely to modify the second homophone to repair a temporary ambiguity (i.e., they were less likely to say … first cover the bat, then cover the baseball bat …). In Experiment 2, participants had to identify one of two identical objects in an object array, which required a modifying relative clause (the shark that's underneath the shoe). Happy speakers omitted the modifying relative clause twice as often as neutral speakers (e.g., by saying Put the shark underneath the sheep), thereby rendering the entire utterance ambiguous in the context of two sharks. The findings suggest that one consequence of positive mood appears to be more ambiguity in speech. This effect is hypothesised to be due to a less effortful processing style favouring an egocentric bias impacting perspective taking or monitoring of alignment of utterances with an addressee's perspective.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1579-1590
Number of pages12
JournalLanguage and Cognitive Processes
Volume28
Issue number10
Early online date19 Dec 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Sharks
Baseball
Emotions
emotion
mood
Shoes
experiment
induction
Sheep
animal
Communication
monitoring
communication
trend
Emotion
Experiment
Mood
Addressee
Referring Expressions
Homophones

Cite this

Kempe, Vera ; Rookes, Melissa ; Swarbrigg, Laura. / Speaker emotion can affect ambiguity production. In: Language and Cognitive Processes. 2013 ; Vol. 28, No. 10. pp. 1579-1590.
@article{ac6a0024e4d741f7bb388775d44cce63,
title = "Speaker emotion can affect ambiguity production",
abstract = "Does speaker emotion affect degree of ambiguity in referring expressions? We used referential communication tasks preceded by mood induction to examine whether positive emotional valence may be linked to ambiguity of referring expressions. In Experiment 1, participants had to identify sequences of objects with homophonic labels (e.g., the animal bat, a baseball bat) for hypothetical addressees. This required modification of the homophones. Happy speakers were less likely to modify the second homophone to repair a temporary ambiguity (i.e., they were less likely to say … first cover the bat, then cover the baseball bat …). In Experiment 2, participants had to identify one of two identical objects in an object array, which required a modifying relative clause (the shark that's underneath the shoe). Happy speakers omitted the modifying relative clause twice as often as neutral speakers (e.g., by saying Put the shark underneath the sheep), thereby rendering the entire utterance ambiguous in the context of two sharks. The findings suggest that one consequence of positive mood appears to be more ambiguity in speech. This effect is hypothesised to be due to a less effortful processing style favouring an egocentric bias impacting perspective taking or monitoring of alignment of utterances with an addressee's perspective.",
author = "Vera Kempe and Melissa Rookes and Laura Swarbrigg",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/01690965.2012.755555",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1579--1590",
journal = "Language, Cognition and Neuroscience",
issn = "2327-3798",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "10",

}

Speaker emotion can affect ambiguity production. / Kempe, Vera; Rookes, Melissa; Swarbrigg, Laura.

In: Language and Cognitive Processes, Vol. 28, No. 10, 2013, p. 1579-1590.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Speaker emotion can affect ambiguity production

AU - Kempe, Vera

AU - Rookes, Melissa

AU - Swarbrigg, Laura

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Does speaker emotion affect degree of ambiguity in referring expressions? We used referential communication tasks preceded by mood induction to examine whether positive emotional valence may be linked to ambiguity of referring expressions. In Experiment 1, participants had to identify sequences of objects with homophonic labels (e.g., the animal bat, a baseball bat) for hypothetical addressees. This required modification of the homophones. Happy speakers were less likely to modify the second homophone to repair a temporary ambiguity (i.e., they were less likely to say … first cover the bat, then cover the baseball bat …). In Experiment 2, participants had to identify one of two identical objects in an object array, which required a modifying relative clause (the shark that's underneath the shoe). Happy speakers omitted the modifying relative clause twice as often as neutral speakers (e.g., by saying Put the shark underneath the sheep), thereby rendering the entire utterance ambiguous in the context of two sharks. The findings suggest that one consequence of positive mood appears to be more ambiguity in speech. This effect is hypothesised to be due to a less effortful processing style favouring an egocentric bias impacting perspective taking or monitoring of alignment of utterances with an addressee's perspective.

AB - Does speaker emotion affect degree of ambiguity in referring expressions? We used referential communication tasks preceded by mood induction to examine whether positive emotional valence may be linked to ambiguity of referring expressions. In Experiment 1, participants had to identify sequences of objects with homophonic labels (e.g., the animal bat, a baseball bat) for hypothetical addressees. This required modification of the homophones. Happy speakers were less likely to modify the second homophone to repair a temporary ambiguity (i.e., they were less likely to say … first cover the bat, then cover the baseball bat …). In Experiment 2, participants had to identify one of two identical objects in an object array, which required a modifying relative clause (the shark that's underneath the shoe). Happy speakers omitted the modifying relative clause twice as often as neutral speakers (e.g., by saying Put the shark underneath the sheep), thereby rendering the entire utterance ambiguous in the context of two sharks. The findings suggest that one consequence of positive mood appears to be more ambiguity in speech. This effect is hypothesised to be due to a less effortful processing style favouring an egocentric bias impacting perspective taking or monitoring of alignment of utterances with an addressee's perspective.

U2 - 10.1080/01690965.2012.755555

DO - 10.1080/01690965.2012.755555

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 1579

EP - 1590

JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

SN - 2327-3798

IS - 10

ER -