Structured risk assessment for reduction of multiple risk outcomes in a secure mental health setting

use of the START

Cevher Gunenc, Laura E. O'Shea, Geoffrey L. Dickens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Structured risk assessment to aid prediction and prevention of risk behaviours in secure settings is common; the expected benefits have rarely been investigated.

Aims: To determine whether adverse outcomes (physical and verbal aggression, self-harm, victimisation, self-neglect, unauthorised leave, substance abuse) reduced after patients were assessed with the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START).

Methods: In a naturalistic study, anonymised demographic and clinical information were collected from 50 male patients. Data included START assessment and frequency of target behaviour data for three months before and after first assessment. Chi square and linear mixed models analyses were used to determine whether there was any change in the behaviours of interest.

Results: There were no significant changes in physical or verbal aggression over time, although a tendency towards fewer incidents was apparent. Other adverse behaviours were very infrequent at baseline, precluding adequate analysis.

Conclusions: In this small sample, START risk assessment did not achieve its primary purpose of significant reduction in adverse behaviours. Although we based our sample size on a power calculation, we may have over-estimated the size of anticipated change. Further, the three-month comparison periods before and after the assessment follow-up period, were rather short. Accordingly, we recommend more research on the value of this tool in practice rather than discontinuing its use.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-71
Number of pages11
JournalCriminal Behaviour and Mental Health
Volume28
Issue number1
Early online date1 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Risk Reduction Behavior
Mental Health
Aggression
Crime Victims
Risk-Taking
Sample Size
Substance-Related Disorders
Linear Models
Demography
Research

Cite this

@article{711d7a6640c645d0b265909ad95ec1ad,
title = "Structured risk assessment for reduction of multiple risk outcomes in a secure mental health setting: use of the START",
abstract = "Background: Structured risk assessment to aid prediction and prevention of risk behaviours in secure settings is common; the expected benefits have rarely been investigated.Aims: To determine whether adverse outcomes (physical and verbal aggression, self-harm, victimisation, self-neglect, unauthorised leave, substance abuse) reduced after patients were assessed with the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START).Methods: In a naturalistic study, anonymised demographic and clinical information were collected from 50 male patients. Data included START assessment and frequency of target behaviour data for three months before and after first assessment. Chi square and linear mixed models analyses were used to determine whether there was any change in the behaviours of interest.Results: There were no significant changes in physical or verbal aggression over time, although a tendency towards fewer incidents was apparent. Other adverse behaviours were very infrequent at baseline, precluding adequate analysis.Conclusions: In this small sample, START risk assessment did not achieve its primary purpose of significant reduction in adverse behaviours. Although we based our sample size on a power calculation, we may have over-estimated the size of anticipated change. Further, the three-month comparison periods before and after the assessment follow-up period, were rather short. Accordingly, we recommend more research on the value of this tool in practice rather than discontinuing its use.",
author = "Cevher Gunenc and O'Shea, {Laura E.} and Dickens, {Geoffrey L.}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1002/cbm.2036",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "61--71",
journal = "Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health",
issn = "0957-9664",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Structured risk assessment for reduction of multiple risk outcomes in a secure mental health setting : use of the START. / Gunenc, Cevher; O'Shea, Laura E.; Dickens, Geoffrey L.

In: Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, Vol. 28, No. 1, 02.2018, p. 61-71.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structured risk assessment for reduction of multiple risk outcomes in a secure mental health setting

T2 - use of the START

AU - Gunenc, Cevher

AU - O'Shea, Laura E.

AU - Dickens, Geoffrey L.

PY - 2018/2

Y1 - 2018/2

N2 - Background: Structured risk assessment to aid prediction and prevention of risk behaviours in secure settings is common; the expected benefits have rarely been investigated.Aims: To determine whether adverse outcomes (physical and verbal aggression, self-harm, victimisation, self-neglect, unauthorised leave, substance abuse) reduced after patients were assessed with the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START).Methods: In a naturalistic study, anonymised demographic and clinical information were collected from 50 male patients. Data included START assessment and frequency of target behaviour data for three months before and after first assessment. Chi square and linear mixed models analyses were used to determine whether there was any change in the behaviours of interest.Results: There were no significant changes in physical or verbal aggression over time, although a tendency towards fewer incidents was apparent. Other adverse behaviours were very infrequent at baseline, precluding adequate analysis.Conclusions: In this small sample, START risk assessment did not achieve its primary purpose of significant reduction in adverse behaviours. Although we based our sample size on a power calculation, we may have over-estimated the size of anticipated change. Further, the three-month comparison periods before and after the assessment follow-up period, were rather short. Accordingly, we recommend more research on the value of this tool in practice rather than discontinuing its use.

AB - Background: Structured risk assessment to aid prediction and prevention of risk behaviours in secure settings is common; the expected benefits have rarely been investigated.Aims: To determine whether adverse outcomes (physical and verbal aggression, self-harm, victimisation, self-neglect, unauthorised leave, substance abuse) reduced after patients were assessed with the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START).Methods: In a naturalistic study, anonymised demographic and clinical information were collected from 50 male patients. Data included START assessment and frequency of target behaviour data for three months before and after first assessment. Chi square and linear mixed models analyses were used to determine whether there was any change in the behaviours of interest.Results: There were no significant changes in physical or verbal aggression over time, although a tendency towards fewer incidents was apparent. Other adverse behaviours were very infrequent at baseline, precluding adequate analysis.Conclusions: In this small sample, START risk assessment did not achieve its primary purpose of significant reduction in adverse behaviours. Although we based our sample size on a power calculation, we may have over-estimated the size of anticipated change. Further, the three-month comparison periods before and after the assessment follow-up period, were rather short. Accordingly, we recommend more research on the value of this tool in practice rather than discontinuing its use.

U2 - 10.1002/cbm.2036

DO - 10.1002/cbm.2036

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 61

EP - 71

JO - Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health

JF - Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health

SN - 0957-9664

IS - 1

ER -