Abstract
Learning by working with peers is a key to student learning. This may involve working cooperatively or collaboratively to address a problem and in this piece we refer to groups working collaboratively on a problem. Group working can present problems for students if some group members dominate the discussions and decision making or others in the group are seen as ‘freeriders’ and take a back seat. The approach asks the group itself to develop a set of criteria for assessing peer contributions. For each criteria, students are asked to define what a contribution that would be awarded excellent would look like and then define what would lead to the award of a fail grade. The task actively engages students in thinking about how to work together as a group. Revisiting the criteria during the course of the module gives space for reflection on the way that the group is working.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 100 ideas for active learning |
Editors | Paolo Oprandi, Tab Betts |
Place of Publication | Brighton |
Publisher | University of Sussex Library |
Pages | 439-444 |
Number of pages | 6 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780995786271 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 20 Jul 2022 |
Keywords
- Peer marking
- Groupwork
- Teamwork
- Assessment
- Students as partners