Subsidy and Local bus service deregulation in Britain: a re-evaluation

Peter Romilly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 23 Citations

Abstract

Local bus services in Britain (excluding London) were deregulated in October 1986. Bus vehicle kilometres increased after deregulation, but passenger journeys fell and bus fares increased in real terms. The inability to reverse the long-run decline in passenger journeys and the increase in bus fares is often cited as evidence of the failure of deregulation to promote greater competition in the industry. This evaluation is not clear-cut, however, since government macroeconomic policy caused significant reductions in subsidy to the bus industry concurrent with deregulation. It can be argued that it is the reduction in subsidy, rather than the lack of competition, which caused fares to increase. If this is the case, then the evaluation of deregulation should allow for the effects of subsidy reduction. This paper specifies and tests an econometric model in which the role of subsidy reduction is explicitly incorporated in a price-markup equation. The model can be used to generate forecasts of bus fares and passenger journeys after allowing for subsidy replacement. These forecasts are compared with those for the continuation of the regulated system. A cost-benefit analysis calculates the net present value of the internal and external welfare gains from deregulation per se in Britain excluding London for 1986-97. A similar analysis is conducted for the metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas of Britain.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-193
Number of pages33
JournalJournal of Transport Economics and Policy
Volume35
Issue number2
StatePublished - May 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

deregulation
subsidy
Deregulation
pricing
Great Britain
Evaluation
competition
prognosis
service
model
industry
Industry
means of transport
economic policy
cost-benefit analysis
econometrics
welfare
price
government
test

Cite this

Romilly, Peter / Subsidy and Local bus service deregulation in Britain : a re-evaluation.

In: Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 35, No. 2, 05.2001, p. 161-193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{20572cd3428349a7acff927717eebe92,
title = "Subsidy and Local bus service deregulation in Britain: a re-evaluation",
abstract = "Local bus services in Britain (excluding London) were deregulated in October 1986. Bus vehicle kilometres increased after deregulation, but passenger journeys fell and bus fares increased in real terms. The inability to reverse the long-run decline in passenger journeys and the increase in bus fares is often cited as evidence of the failure of deregulation to promote greater competition in the industry. This evaluation is not clear-cut, however, since government macroeconomic policy caused significant reductions in subsidy to the bus industry concurrent with deregulation. It can be argued that it is the reduction in subsidy, rather than the lack of competition, which caused fares to increase. If this is the case, then the evaluation of deregulation should allow for the effects of subsidy reduction. This paper specifies and tests an econometric model in which the role of subsidy reduction is explicitly incorporated in a price-markup equation. The model can be used to generate forecasts of bus fares and passenger journeys after allowing for subsidy replacement. These forecasts are compared with those for the continuation of the regulated system. A cost-benefit analysis calculates the net present value of the internal and external welfare gains from deregulation per se in Britain excluding London for 1986-97. A similar analysis is conducted for the metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas of Britain.",
author = "Peter Romilly",
year = "2001",
month = "5",
volume = "35",
pages = "161--193",
journal = "Journal of Transport Economics and Policy",
issn = "0022-5258",
publisher = "University of Bath",
number = "2",

}

Subsidy and Local bus service deregulation in Britain : a re-evaluation. / Romilly, Peter.

In: Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 35, No. 2, 05.2001, p. 161-193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subsidy and Local bus service deregulation in Britain

T2 - Journal of Transport Economics and Policy

AU - Romilly,Peter

PY - 2001/5

Y1 - 2001/5

N2 - Local bus services in Britain (excluding London) were deregulated in October 1986. Bus vehicle kilometres increased after deregulation, but passenger journeys fell and bus fares increased in real terms. The inability to reverse the long-run decline in passenger journeys and the increase in bus fares is often cited as evidence of the failure of deregulation to promote greater competition in the industry. This evaluation is not clear-cut, however, since government macroeconomic policy caused significant reductions in subsidy to the bus industry concurrent with deregulation. It can be argued that it is the reduction in subsidy, rather than the lack of competition, which caused fares to increase. If this is the case, then the evaluation of deregulation should allow for the effects of subsidy reduction. This paper specifies and tests an econometric model in which the role of subsidy reduction is explicitly incorporated in a price-markup equation. The model can be used to generate forecasts of bus fares and passenger journeys after allowing for subsidy replacement. These forecasts are compared with those for the continuation of the regulated system. A cost-benefit analysis calculates the net present value of the internal and external welfare gains from deregulation per se in Britain excluding London for 1986-97. A similar analysis is conducted for the metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas of Britain.

AB - Local bus services in Britain (excluding London) were deregulated in October 1986. Bus vehicle kilometres increased after deregulation, but passenger journeys fell and bus fares increased in real terms. The inability to reverse the long-run decline in passenger journeys and the increase in bus fares is often cited as evidence of the failure of deregulation to promote greater competition in the industry. This evaluation is not clear-cut, however, since government macroeconomic policy caused significant reductions in subsidy to the bus industry concurrent with deregulation. It can be argued that it is the reduction in subsidy, rather than the lack of competition, which caused fares to increase. If this is the case, then the evaluation of deregulation should allow for the effects of subsidy reduction. This paper specifies and tests an econometric model in which the role of subsidy reduction is explicitly incorporated in a price-markup equation. The model can be used to generate forecasts of bus fares and passenger journeys after allowing for subsidy replacement. These forecasts are compared with those for the continuation of the regulated system. A cost-benefit analysis calculates the net present value of the internal and external welfare gains from deregulation per se in Britain excluding London for 1986-97. A similar analysis is conducted for the metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas of Britain.

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 161

EP - 193

JO - Journal of Transport Economics and Policy

JF - Journal of Transport Economics and Policy

SN - 0022-5258

IS - 2

ER -