Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue

Holly P. Branigan, Martin J. Pickering, Janet F. McLean, Alexandra A. Cleland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

83 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We report three experiments that investigated whether the linguistic behavior of participants in a dialogue is affected by their role within that interaction. All experiments were concerned with the way in which speakers choose between syntactic forms with very similar meanings. Theories of dialogue assume that speakers address their contributions directly to their addressees, but also indirectly to side participants. In Experiments 1 and 2, speakers produced picture descriptions that had the same syntactic structure as a previous speaker’s descriptions which had been addressed to a third person. This indicated that syntactic alignment is not limited to speaker-addressee dyads. However, the prior participant role of the current speaker affected alignment: prior addressees aligned more than prior side-participants. In contrast, Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrated that alignment was unaffected by the prior participant role of the current addressee. We interpret these findings in terms of depth of processing during encoding.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-197
Number of pages35
JournalCognition
Volume104
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jul 2006

Fingerprint

Linguistics
dialogue
experiment
dyad
Participant Roles
Alignment
Syntax
linguistics
human being
interaction
Experiment
Addressee

Cite this

Branigan, Holly P. ; Pickering, Martin J. ; McLean, Janet F. ; Cleland, Alexandra A. / Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue. In: Cognition. 2006 ; Vol. 104, No. 2. pp. 163-197.
@article{e401f57bd5bb41229ab0d97e47746017,
title = "Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue",
abstract = "We report three experiments that investigated whether the linguistic behavior of participants in a dialogue is affected by their role within that interaction. All experiments were concerned with the way in which speakers choose between syntactic forms with very similar meanings. Theories of dialogue assume that speakers address their contributions directly to their addressees, but also indirectly to side participants. In Experiments 1 and 2, speakers produced picture descriptions that had the same syntactic structure as a previous speaker’s descriptions which had been addressed to a third person. This indicated that syntactic alignment is not limited to speaker-addressee dyads. However, the prior participant role of the current speaker affected alignment: prior addressees aligned more than prior side-participants. In contrast, Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrated that alignment was unaffected by the prior participant role of the current addressee. We interpret these findings in terms of depth of processing during encoding.",
author = "Branigan, {Holly P.} and Pickering, {Martin J.} and McLean, {Janet F.} and Cleland, {Alexandra A.}",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.006",
language = "English",
volume = "104",
pages = "163--197",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Branigan, HP, Pickering, MJ, McLean, JF & Cleland, AA 2006, 'Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue', Cognition, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 163-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.006

Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue. / Branigan, Holly P.; Pickering, Martin J.; McLean, Janet F.; Cleland, Alexandra A.

In: Cognition, Vol. 104, No. 2, 31.07.2006, p. 163-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue

AU - Branigan, Holly P.

AU - Pickering, Martin J.

AU - McLean, Janet F.

AU - Cleland, Alexandra A.

PY - 2006/7/31

Y1 - 2006/7/31

N2 - We report three experiments that investigated whether the linguistic behavior of participants in a dialogue is affected by their role within that interaction. All experiments were concerned with the way in which speakers choose between syntactic forms with very similar meanings. Theories of dialogue assume that speakers address their contributions directly to their addressees, but also indirectly to side participants. In Experiments 1 and 2, speakers produced picture descriptions that had the same syntactic structure as a previous speaker’s descriptions which had been addressed to a third person. This indicated that syntactic alignment is not limited to speaker-addressee dyads. However, the prior participant role of the current speaker affected alignment: prior addressees aligned more than prior side-participants. In contrast, Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrated that alignment was unaffected by the prior participant role of the current addressee. We interpret these findings in terms of depth of processing during encoding.

AB - We report three experiments that investigated whether the linguistic behavior of participants in a dialogue is affected by their role within that interaction. All experiments were concerned with the way in which speakers choose between syntactic forms with very similar meanings. Theories of dialogue assume that speakers address their contributions directly to their addressees, but also indirectly to side participants. In Experiments 1 and 2, speakers produced picture descriptions that had the same syntactic structure as a previous speaker’s descriptions which had been addressed to a third person. This indicated that syntactic alignment is not limited to speaker-addressee dyads. However, the prior participant role of the current speaker affected alignment: prior addressees aligned more than prior side-participants. In contrast, Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrated that alignment was unaffected by the prior participant role of the current addressee. We interpret these findings in terms of depth of processing during encoding.

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.006

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.006

M3 - Article

VL - 104

SP - 163

EP - 197

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

IS - 2

ER -