Syntactic priming in spoken production

linguistic and temporal interference

Holly P. Branigan, Martin J. Pickering, Andrew J. Stewart, Janet F. McLean

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current evidence about the persistence of syntactic priming effects (Bock, 1986) is equivocal: Using spoken picture description, Bock and Griffin (2000) found that it persisted over as many as 10 trials; using written sentence completion, Branigan, Pickering, and Cleland (1999) found that it dissipated if even a single sentence intervened between prime and target. This paper asks what causes it to be long lasting. On one account, the rapid decay evidenced by Branigan et al. occurs because the task emphasizes conceptual planning; on another account, it is due to the written nature of their task. If conceptual planning is the cause, this might relate to planning the prime sentence or planning an intervening sentence. Hence we conducted an experiment with spoken sentence completion, contrasting no delay, an intervening sentence, and a pure temporal delay. The results indicated that strong and similar priming occurred in all three cases, therefore lending support to the claim that spoken priming is long lasting.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1297-1302
Number of pages6
JournalMemory and Cognition
Volume28
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2000

Fingerprint

Linguistics
Interference
Planning
Syntactic Priming
Sentence Completion
Causes
Priming

Cite this

Branigan, Holly P. ; Pickering, Martin J. ; Stewart, Andrew J. ; McLean, Janet F. / Syntactic priming in spoken production : linguistic and temporal interference. In: Memory and Cognition. 2000 ; Vol. 28, No. 8. pp. 1297-1302.
@article{c7f0d2c814814c528da0e531ace7e64d,
title = "Syntactic priming in spoken production: linguistic and temporal interference",
abstract = "Current evidence about the persistence of syntactic priming effects (Bock, 1986) is equivocal: Using spoken picture description, Bock and Griffin (2000) found that it persisted over as many as 10 trials; using written sentence completion, Branigan, Pickering, and Cleland (1999) found that it dissipated if even a single sentence intervened between prime and target. This paper asks what causes it to be long lasting. On one account, the rapid decay evidenced by Branigan et al. occurs because the task emphasizes conceptual planning; on another account, it is due to the written nature of their task. If conceptual planning is the cause, this might relate to planning the prime sentence or planning an intervening sentence. Hence we conducted an experiment with spoken sentence completion, contrasting no delay, an intervening sentence, and a pure temporal delay. The results indicated that strong and similar priming occurred in all three cases, therefore lending support to the claim that spoken priming is long lasting.",
author = "Branigan, {Holly P.} and Pickering, {Martin J.} and Stewart, {Andrew J.} and McLean, {Janet F.}",
year = "2000",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03211830",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1297--1302",
journal = "Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

Syntactic priming in spoken production : linguistic and temporal interference. / Branigan, Holly P.; Pickering, Martin J.; Stewart, Andrew J.; McLean, Janet F.

In: Memory and Cognition, Vol. 28, No. 8, 01.12.2000, p. 1297-1302.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Syntactic priming in spoken production

T2 - linguistic and temporal interference

AU - Branigan, Holly P.

AU - Pickering, Martin J.

AU - Stewart, Andrew J.

AU - McLean, Janet F.

PY - 2000/12/1

Y1 - 2000/12/1

N2 - Current evidence about the persistence of syntactic priming effects (Bock, 1986) is equivocal: Using spoken picture description, Bock and Griffin (2000) found that it persisted over as many as 10 trials; using written sentence completion, Branigan, Pickering, and Cleland (1999) found that it dissipated if even a single sentence intervened between prime and target. This paper asks what causes it to be long lasting. On one account, the rapid decay evidenced by Branigan et al. occurs because the task emphasizes conceptual planning; on another account, it is due to the written nature of their task. If conceptual planning is the cause, this might relate to planning the prime sentence or planning an intervening sentence. Hence we conducted an experiment with spoken sentence completion, contrasting no delay, an intervening sentence, and a pure temporal delay. The results indicated that strong and similar priming occurred in all three cases, therefore lending support to the claim that spoken priming is long lasting.

AB - Current evidence about the persistence of syntactic priming effects (Bock, 1986) is equivocal: Using spoken picture description, Bock and Griffin (2000) found that it persisted over as many as 10 trials; using written sentence completion, Branigan, Pickering, and Cleland (1999) found that it dissipated if even a single sentence intervened between prime and target. This paper asks what causes it to be long lasting. On one account, the rapid decay evidenced by Branigan et al. occurs because the task emphasizes conceptual planning; on another account, it is due to the written nature of their task. If conceptual planning is the cause, this might relate to planning the prime sentence or planning an intervening sentence. Hence we conducted an experiment with spoken sentence completion, contrasting no delay, an intervening sentence, and a pure temporal delay. The results indicated that strong and similar priming occurred in all three cases, therefore lending support to the claim that spoken priming is long lasting.

U2 - 10.3758/BF03211830

DO - 10.3758/BF03211830

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 1297

EP - 1302

JO - Memory and Cognition

JF - Memory and Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 8

ER -