Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1297-1302 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Memory and Cognition |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2000 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Syntactic priming in spoken production : linguistic and temporal interference. / Branigan, Holly P.; Pickering, Martin J.; Stewart, Andrew J.; McLean, Janet F.
In: Memory and Cognition, Vol. 28, No. 8, 01.12.2000, p. 1297-1302.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Syntactic priming in spoken production
T2 - linguistic and temporal interference
AU - Branigan, Holly P.
AU - Pickering, Martin J.
AU - Stewart, Andrew J.
AU - McLean, Janet F.
PY - 2000/12/1
Y1 - 2000/12/1
N2 - Current evidence about the persistence of syntactic priming effects (Bock, 1986) is equivocal: Using spoken picture description, Bock and Griffin (2000) found that it persisted over as many as 10 trials; using written sentence completion, Branigan, Pickering, and Cleland (1999) found that it dissipated if even a single sentence intervened between prime and target. This paper asks what causes it to be long lasting. On one account, the rapid decay evidenced by Branigan et al. occurs because the task emphasizes conceptual planning; on another account, it is due to the written nature of their task. If conceptual planning is the cause, this might relate to planning the prime sentence or planning an intervening sentence. Hence we conducted an experiment with spoken sentence completion, contrasting no delay, an intervening sentence, and a pure temporal delay. The results indicated that strong and similar priming occurred in all three cases, therefore lending support to the claim that spoken priming is long lasting.
AB - Current evidence about the persistence of syntactic priming effects (Bock, 1986) is equivocal: Using spoken picture description, Bock and Griffin (2000) found that it persisted over as many as 10 trials; using written sentence completion, Branigan, Pickering, and Cleland (1999) found that it dissipated if even a single sentence intervened between prime and target. This paper asks what causes it to be long lasting. On one account, the rapid decay evidenced by Branigan et al. occurs because the task emphasizes conceptual planning; on another account, it is due to the written nature of their task. If conceptual planning is the cause, this might relate to planning the prime sentence or planning an intervening sentence. Hence we conducted an experiment with spoken sentence completion, contrasting no delay, an intervening sentence, and a pure temporal delay. The results indicated that strong and similar priming occurred in all three cases, therefore lending support to the claim that spoken priming is long lasting.
U2 - 10.3758/BF03211830
DO - 10.3758/BF03211830
M3 - Article
VL - 28
SP - 1297
EP - 1302
JO - Memory and Cognition
JF - Memory and Cognition
SN - 0090-502X
IS - 8
ER -