Abstract
I examine the positive and negative features of synthetic biology (‘SynBio’) from a utilitarian ethical perspective. The potential beneficial outcomes from SynBio in the context of medicine are substantial; however it is not presently possible to predict precise outcomes due to the nascent state of the field. Potential negative outcomes from SynBio also exist, including iatrogenesis and bioterrorism; however it is not yet possible to quantify these risks. I argue that the application of a ‘precautionary’ approach to SynBio is ethically fraught, as is the notion that SynBio-associated knowledge ought to be restricted. I conclude that utilitarians ought to support a broadly laissez-faire stance in respect of SynBio.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 453-463 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Bioethics |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| Early online date | 9 Sept 2013 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2013 |
Keywords
- SynBio
- Dual-use ethics
- Ethics of knowledge
- Precautionary pinciple
- Utilitarianism