This chapter considers, from an ordinary language philosophy perspective, how people talk about pain in terms of occurrences, abstractions, and frustrations. Pain, and especially chronic pain, is something that can occur in a come-and-go manner in particular circumstances, or in a regular or irregular manner and with variable severity. Talking about such occurrences can prove difficult and frustrating, particularly in the course of medical consultations. Discussing pain in these consultations requires that doctors and patients use ordinary everyday language to both describe and assess a medical condition. This kind of talk requires a degree of abstraction in describing pain. From a medical point of view, and in general, this gives talk about pain a dualistic character in terms of references to both particular occurrences and abstractions about its qualities. Such references can range over matters that deal with specific features, as well as those that are independent of these, such as, bodily location, severity, susceptibility, temporal occurrence, and phenomenological qualities. The chapter argues that this tension – focusing on particularities and abstractions – make attempts to individuate people’s experiences of pain, particularly in medical encounters, frustrating.
|Title of host publication||Pain without boundaries|
|Subtitle of host publication||inquiries across cultures|
|Editors||Roy F. Fox, Nicole Monteiro|
|Place of Publication||Oxford|
|Number of pages||11|
|Publication status||Published - 2014|