'The callous credit nexus': ideology and compulsion in the crisis of Neoliberalism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 4 Citations

Abstract

Many accounts of the rise and decline of neoliberalism forefront its ideological nature and capacity for hegemonic leadership. In contrast, I argue that outside of elite groups neoliberalism did not become hegemonic in Gramsci's sense of a 'national-popular' force. Neoliberalism is a convenient term to describe a two-stage process of 'purifying' the coercive nature of the capital relation through what Gramsci broadly called 'a war of movement' in the 1970s and 1980s and 'a war of position' in the 1990s and 2000s. This double-movement compelled credit-worthy individuals to routinely market, sell, purchase and perform for money-wages. New techniques of the self were perfected in the marketised war of position to service the credit-led financialisation of everyday life. Social positionings dependent on financialisation are now subject to a 'crisis of authority'.
Original languageEnglish
Article number5
Number of pages5
JournalSociological Research Online
Volume14
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 2009

Fingerprint

neoliberalism
credit
war
crisis
compulsion
measurement method
everyday life
purchase
wage
money
elite
ideology
capital
leadership
authority
capacity
market
service
individual
process

Cite this

Law, Alex / 'The callous credit nexus' : ideology and compulsion in the crisis of Neoliberalism.

In: Sociological Research Online, Vol. 14, No. 4, 5, 08.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8598306ce5ed4c6bac2b495ff1052d53,
title = "'The callous credit nexus': ideology and compulsion in the crisis of Neoliberalism",
abstract = "Many accounts of the rise and decline of neoliberalism forefront its ideological nature and capacity for hegemonic leadership. In contrast, I argue that outside of elite groups neoliberalism did not become hegemonic in Gramsci's sense of a 'national-popular' force. Neoliberalism is a convenient term to describe a two-stage process of 'purifying' the coercive nature of the capital relation through what Gramsci broadly called 'a war of movement' in the 1970s and 1980s and 'a war of position' in the 1990s and 2000s. This double-movement compelled credit-worthy individuals to routinely market, sell, purchase and perform for money-wages. New techniques of the self were perfected in the marketised war of position to service the credit-led financialisation of everyday life. Social positionings dependent on financialisation are now subject to a 'crisis of authority'.",
author = "Alex Law",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
volume = "14",
journal = "Sociological Research Online",
issn = "1360-7804",
publisher = "Sociological Research Online",
number = "4",

}

'The callous credit nexus' : ideology and compulsion in the crisis of Neoliberalism. / Law, Alex.

In: Sociological Research Online, Vol. 14, No. 4, 5, 08.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'The callous credit nexus'

T2 - Sociological Research Online

AU - Law,Alex

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - Many accounts of the rise and decline of neoliberalism forefront its ideological nature and capacity for hegemonic leadership. In contrast, I argue that outside of elite groups neoliberalism did not become hegemonic in Gramsci's sense of a 'national-popular' force. Neoliberalism is a convenient term to describe a two-stage process of 'purifying' the coercive nature of the capital relation through what Gramsci broadly called 'a war of movement' in the 1970s and 1980s and 'a war of position' in the 1990s and 2000s. This double-movement compelled credit-worthy individuals to routinely market, sell, purchase and perform for money-wages. New techniques of the self were perfected in the marketised war of position to service the credit-led financialisation of everyday life. Social positionings dependent on financialisation are now subject to a 'crisis of authority'.

AB - Many accounts of the rise and decline of neoliberalism forefront its ideological nature and capacity for hegemonic leadership. In contrast, I argue that outside of elite groups neoliberalism did not become hegemonic in Gramsci's sense of a 'national-popular' force. Neoliberalism is a convenient term to describe a two-stage process of 'purifying' the coercive nature of the capital relation through what Gramsci broadly called 'a war of movement' in the 1970s and 1980s and 'a war of position' in the 1990s and 2000s. This double-movement compelled credit-worthy individuals to routinely market, sell, purchase and perform for money-wages. New techniques of the self were perfected in the marketised war of position to service the credit-led financialisation of everyday life. Social positionings dependent on financialisation are now subject to a 'crisis of authority'.

M3 - Article

VL - 14

JO - Sociological Research Online

JF - Sociological Research Online

SN - 1360-7804

IS - 4

M1 - 5

ER -