The development of selective copying: children’s learning from an expert versus their mother

Amanda J. Lucas, Emily R. R. Burdett, Vanessa Burgess, Lara A. Wood, Nicola McGuigan, Paul L. Harris, Andrew Whiten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

This study tested the prediction that, with age, children should rely less on familiarity and more on expertise in their selective social learning. Experiment 1 (N=50) found that 5- to 6-year-olds copied the technique their mother used to extract a prize from a novel puzzle box, in preference to both a stranger and an established expert. This bias occurred despite children acknowledging the expert model’s superior capability. Experiment 2 (N=50) demonstrated a shift in 7-to 8-year-olds towards copying the expert. Children aged 9- to 10-years did not copy according to a model bias. The findings of a follow-up study (N=30) confirmed that, instead, they prioritized their own – partially flawed – causal understanding of the puzzle box.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages17
JournalChild Development
Early online date29 Dec 2016
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - 29 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

child
Learning
mother
experiment
trend
model
Recognition (Psychology)
social learning
superior
expertise
prognosis
preference
age
understanding
learning
development

Cite this

Lucas, A. J., Burdett, E. R. R., Burgess, V., Wood, L. A., McGuigan, N., Harris, P. L., & Whiten, A. (2016). The development of selective copying: children’s learning from an expert versus their mother. Child Development. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12711

Lucas, Amanda J.; Burdett, Emily R. R.; Burgess, Vanessa; Wood, Lara A.; McGuigan, Nicola; Harris, Paul L.; Whiten, Andrew / The development of selective copying : children’s learning from an expert versus their mother.

In: Child Development, 29.12.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3354212c6de14270a6877e54ea354073,
title = "The development of selective copying: children’s learning from an expert versus their mother",
abstract = "This study tested the prediction that, with age, children should rely less on familiarity and more on expertise in their selective social learning. Experiment 1 (N=50) found that 5- to 6-year-olds copied the technique their mother used to extract a prize from a novel puzzle box, in preference to both a stranger and an established expert. This bias occurred despite children acknowledging the expert model’s superior capability. Experiment 2 (N=50) demonstrated a shift in 7-to 8-year-olds towards copying the expert. Children aged 9- to 10-years did not copy according to a model bias. The findings of a follow-up study (N=30) confirmed that, instead, they prioritized their own – partially flawed – causal understanding of the puzzle box.",
author = "Lucas, {Amanda J.} and Burdett, {Emily R. R.} and Vanessa Burgess and Wood, {Lara A.} and Nicola McGuigan and Harris, {Paul L.} and Andrew Whiten",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/cdev.12711",
journal = "Child Development",
issn = "0009-3920",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

The development of selective copying : children’s learning from an expert versus their mother. / Lucas, Amanda J.; Burdett, Emily R. R.; Burgess, Vanessa; Wood, Lara A.; McGuigan, Nicola; Harris, Paul L.; Whiten, Andrew.

In: Child Development, 29.12.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The development of selective copying

T2 - Child Development

AU - Lucas,Amanda J.

AU - Burdett,Emily R. R.

AU - Burgess,Vanessa

AU - Wood,Lara A.

AU - McGuigan,Nicola

AU - Harris,Paul L.

AU - Whiten,Andrew

PY - 2016/12/29

Y1 - 2016/12/29

N2 - This study tested the prediction that, with age, children should rely less on familiarity and more on expertise in their selective social learning. Experiment 1 (N=50) found that 5- to 6-year-olds copied the technique their mother used to extract a prize from a novel puzzle box, in preference to both a stranger and an established expert. This bias occurred despite children acknowledging the expert model’s superior capability. Experiment 2 (N=50) demonstrated a shift in 7-to 8-year-olds towards copying the expert. Children aged 9- to 10-years did not copy according to a model bias. The findings of a follow-up study (N=30) confirmed that, instead, they prioritized their own – partially flawed – causal understanding of the puzzle box.

AB - This study tested the prediction that, with age, children should rely less on familiarity and more on expertise in their selective social learning. Experiment 1 (N=50) found that 5- to 6-year-olds copied the technique their mother used to extract a prize from a novel puzzle box, in preference to both a stranger and an established expert. This bias occurred despite children acknowledging the expert model’s superior capability. Experiment 2 (N=50) demonstrated a shift in 7-to 8-year-olds towards copying the expert. Children aged 9- to 10-years did not copy according to a model bias. The findings of a follow-up study (N=30) confirmed that, instead, they prioritized their own – partially flawed – causal understanding of the puzzle box.

U2 - 10.1111/cdev.12711

DO - 10.1111/cdev.12711

M3 - Article

JO - Child Development

JF - Child Development

SN - 0009-3920

ER -

Lucas AJ, Burdett ERR, Burgess V, Wood LA, McGuigan N, Harris PL et al. The development of selective copying: children’s learning from an expert versus their mother. Child Development. 2016 Dec 29. Available from, DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12711