The enigma of facial asymmetry: is there a gender specific pattern of facedness?

Scott M. Hardie, Peter J. B. Hancock, Paul Rodway, Ian Penton-Voak, Derek Carson, Lynn Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 11 Citations

Abstract

Although facial symmetry correlates with facial attractiveness, human faces are often far from symmetrical with one side frequently being larger than the other (Kowner, 1998). Smith (2000) reported that male and female faces were asymmetrical in opposite directions, with males having a larger area on the left side compared to the right side, and females having a larger right side compared to the left side. The present study attempted to replicate and extend this finding. Two databases of facial images from Stirling and St Andrews Universities, consisting of 180 and 122 faces respectively, and a third set of 62 faces collected at Abertay University, were used to examine Smith's findings. Smith's unique method of calculating the size of each hemiface was applied to each set. For the Stirling and St Andrews sets a computer program did this automatically and for the Abertay set it was done manually. No significant overall effect of gender on facial area asymmetry was found. However, the St Andrews sample demonstrated a similar effect to that found by Smith, with females having a significantly larger mean area of right hemiface and males having a larger left hemiface. In addition, for the Abertay faces handedness had a significant effect on facial asymmetry with right-handers having a larger left side of the face. These findings give limited support for Smith's results but also suggest that finding such an asymmetry may depend on some as yet unidentified factors inherent in some methods of image collection.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)295-304
Number of pages10
JournalLaterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2005

Fingerprint

Asymmetry
Facial Asymmetry
Attractiveness
Human face
Handedness
Asymmetrical
Symmetry
Data base
Enigma
Software

Cite this

Hardie, Scott M.; Hancock, Peter J. B.; Rodway, Paul; Penton-Voak, Ian; Carson, Derek; Wright, Lynn / The enigma of facial asymmetry : is there a gender specific pattern of facedness?

In: Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, Vol. 10, No. 4, 07.2005, p. 295-304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{07b012e5278942a595b7b1179fd77fd1,
title = "The enigma of facial asymmetry: is there a gender specific pattern of facedness?",
abstract = "Although facial symmetry correlates with facial attractiveness, human faces are often far from symmetrical with one side frequently being larger than the other (Kowner, 1998). Smith (2000) reported that male and female faces were asymmetrical in opposite directions, with males having a larger area on the left side compared to the right side, and females having a larger right side compared to the left side. The present study attempted to replicate and extend this finding. Two databases of facial images from Stirling and St Andrews Universities, consisting of 180 and 122 faces respectively, and a third set of 62 faces collected at Abertay University, were used to examine Smith's findings. Smith's unique method of calculating the size of each hemiface was applied to each set. For the Stirling and St Andrews sets a computer program did this automatically and for the Abertay set it was done manually. No significant overall effect of gender on facial area asymmetry was found. However, the St Andrews sample demonstrated a similar effect to that found by Smith, with females having a significantly larger mean area of right hemiface and males having a larger left hemiface. In addition, for the Abertay faces handedness had a significant effect on facial asymmetry with right-handers having a larger left side of the face. These findings give limited support for Smith's results but also suggest that finding such an asymmetry may depend on some as yet unidentified factors inherent in some methods of image collection.",
author = "Hardie, {Scott M.} and Hancock, {Peter J. B.} and Paul Rodway and Ian Penton-Voak and Derek Carson and Lynn Wright",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/13576500442000094",
volume = "10",
pages = "295--304",
journal = "Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition",
issn = "1357-650X",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "4",

}

The enigma of facial asymmetry : is there a gender specific pattern of facedness? / Hardie, Scott M.; Hancock, Peter J. B.; Rodway, Paul; Penton-Voak, Ian; Carson, Derek; Wright, Lynn.

In: Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, Vol. 10, No. 4, 07.2005, p. 295-304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The enigma of facial asymmetry

T2 - Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition

AU - Hardie,Scott M.

AU - Hancock,Peter J. B.

AU - Rodway,Paul

AU - Penton-Voak,Ian

AU - Carson,Derek

AU - Wright,Lynn

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - Although facial symmetry correlates with facial attractiveness, human faces are often far from symmetrical with one side frequently being larger than the other (Kowner, 1998). Smith (2000) reported that male and female faces were asymmetrical in opposite directions, with males having a larger area on the left side compared to the right side, and females having a larger right side compared to the left side. The present study attempted to replicate and extend this finding. Two databases of facial images from Stirling and St Andrews Universities, consisting of 180 and 122 faces respectively, and a third set of 62 faces collected at Abertay University, were used to examine Smith's findings. Smith's unique method of calculating the size of each hemiface was applied to each set. For the Stirling and St Andrews sets a computer program did this automatically and for the Abertay set it was done manually. No significant overall effect of gender on facial area asymmetry was found. However, the St Andrews sample demonstrated a similar effect to that found by Smith, with females having a significantly larger mean area of right hemiface and males having a larger left hemiface. In addition, for the Abertay faces handedness had a significant effect on facial asymmetry with right-handers having a larger left side of the face. These findings give limited support for Smith's results but also suggest that finding such an asymmetry may depend on some as yet unidentified factors inherent in some methods of image collection.

AB - Although facial symmetry correlates with facial attractiveness, human faces are often far from symmetrical with one side frequently being larger than the other (Kowner, 1998). Smith (2000) reported that male and female faces were asymmetrical in opposite directions, with males having a larger area on the left side compared to the right side, and females having a larger right side compared to the left side. The present study attempted to replicate and extend this finding. Two databases of facial images from Stirling and St Andrews Universities, consisting of 180 and 122 faces respectively, and a third set of 62 faces collected at Abertay University, were used to examine Smith's findings. Smith's unique method of calculating the size of each hemiface was applied to each set. For the Stirling and St Andrews sets a computer program did this automatically and for the Abertay set it was done manually. No significant overall effect of gender on facial area asymmetry was found. However, the St Andrews sample demonstrated a similar effect to that found by Smith, with females having a significantly larger mean area of right hemiface and males having a larger left hemiface. In addition, for the Abertay faces handedness had a significant effect on facial asymmetry with right-handers having a larger left side of the face. These findings give limited support for Smith's results but also suggest that finding such an asymmetry may depend on some as yet unidentified factors inherent in some methods of image collection.

U2 - 10.1080/13576500442000094

DO - 10.1080/13576500442000094

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 295

EP - 304

JO - Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition

JF - Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition

SN - 1357-650X

IS - 4

ER -