The ethics of anomalous, unconventional therapies: a utilitarian response

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 3 Citations

Abstract

Consequences arising from the assimilation of anomalous therapies into health-care and educational settings are of key ethical concern. Consideration of such consequences is particularly important in light of the increasing prominence of ineffective therapies in clinical practice and in universities. This paper highlights negative outcomes likely to arise from support or tolerance afforded to unconventional therapies. Such outcomes include a diversion of public and private resources from methods predicated on logic and evidence and a weakening of commitment to science-based medicine. In addition, an important spiraling effect occurs in which support for unconventional therapies leads to an amplification of negative consequences. Each instance of tacit support given to unconventional therapies (regardless of source; e.g., health-care systems, hospitals, or universities) represents a contribution against effective medicine. From this, it is concluded that rational health-care practitioners and educators have a moral duty to take a position against anomalous and ineffective therapies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)26-28
JournalThe Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine
Volume7
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Ethics
Delivery of Health Care
Medicine
Moral Obligations

Cite this

Smith, Kevin R. / The ethics of anomalous, unconventional therapies : a utilitarian response.

In: The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2003, p. 26-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4b5bb63046c44afeb242eac247189ffb,
title = "The ethics of anomalous, unconventional therapies: a utilitarian response",
abstract = "Consequences arising from the assimilation of anomalous therapies into health-care and educational settings are of key ethical concern. Consideration of such consequences is particularly important in light of the increasing prominence of ineffective therapies in clinical practice and in universities. This paper highlights negative outcomes likely to arise from support or tolerance afforded to unconventional therapies. Such outcomes include a diversion of public and private resources from methods predicated on logic and evidence and a weakening of commitment to science-based medicine. In addition, an important spiraling effect occurs in which support for unconventional therapies leads to an amplification of negative consequences. Each instance of tacit support given to unconventional therapies (regardless of source; e.g., health-care systems, hospitals, or universities) represents a contribution against effective medicine. From this, it is concluded that rational health-care practitioners and educators have a moral duty to take a position against anomalous and ineffective therapies.",
author = "Smith, {Kevin R.}",
year = "2003",
volume = "7",
pages = "26--28",
journal = "The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine",
number = "1",

}

The ethics of anomalous, unconventional therapies : a utilitarian response. / Smith, Kevin R.

In: The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2003, p. 26-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ethics of anomalous, unconventional therapies

T2 - The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine

AU - Smith,Kevin R.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Consequences arising from the assimilation of anomalous therapies into health-care and educational settings are of key ethical concern. Consideration of such consequences is particularly important in light of the increasing prominence of ineffective therapies in clinical practice and in universities. This paper highlights negative outcomes likely to arise from support or tolerance afforded to unconventional therapies. Such outcomes include a diversion of public and private resources from methods predicated on logic and evidence and a weakening of commitment to science-based medicine. In addition, an important spiraling effect occurs in which support for unconventional therapies leads to an amplification of negative consequences. Each instance of tacit support given to unconventional therapies (regardless of source; e.g., health-care systems, hospitals, or universities) represents a contribution against effective medicine. From this, it is concluded that rational health-care practitioners and educators have a moral duty to take a position against anomalous and ineffective therapies.

AB - Consequences arising from the assimilation of anomalous therapies into health-care and educational settings are of key ethical concern. Consideration of such consequences is particularly important in light of the increasing prominence of ineffective therapies in clinical practice and in universities. This paper highlights negative outcomes likely to arise from support or tolerance afforded to unconventional therapies. Such outcomes include a diversion of public and private resources from methods predicated on logic and evidence and a weakening of commitment to science-based medicine. In addition, an important spiraling effect occurs in which support for unconventional therapies leads to an amplification of negative consequences. Each instance of tacit support given to unconventional therapies (regardless of source; e.g., health-care systems, hospitals, or universities) represents a contribution against effective medicine. From this, it is concluded that rational health-care practitioners and educators have a moral duty to take a position against anomalous and ineffective therapies.

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 26

EP - 28

JO - The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine

JF - The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine

IS - 1

ER -