The Extra Load Index as a method for comparing the relative economy of load carriage systems

Ray Lloyd, Karen Hind, Bridget Parr, Simeon Davies, Carlton Cooke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Extra Load Index (ELI) has been proposed as a suitable method of assessing the relative economy of load carriage systems. The purpose of this study was to determine, based on empirical evidence, that the ELI can accommodate variations in both body composition and added load. In total, 30 women walked carrying loads of up to 70% body mass at self-selected walking speeds whilst expired air was collected. In addition, each of the women had body composition assessed via dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results show that the ELI is independent of body composition variables, the magnitude of additional loads and the speed of progression. Consequently, it is suggested that it represents an appropriate method of comparing load carriage systems in both scientific and commercial arenas. Statement of Relevance:This paper demonstrates that ELI is independent of body composition, added load and speed and is therefore an appropriate method to generalise comparisons of load carriage systems. It has the advantage of being easily understood by manufacturers and consumers whilst retaining appropriate scientific precision.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1500-1504
Number of pages5
JournalErgonomics
Volume53
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Body Composition
economy
Chemical analysis
Photon Absorptiometry
Air
X rays
air
energy
evidence

Cite this

Lloyd, Ray ; Hind, Karen ; Parr, Bridget ; Davies, Simeon ; Cooke, Carlton. / The Extra Load Index as a method for comparing the relative economy of load carriage systems. In: Ergonomics. 2010 ; Vol. 53, No. 12. pp. 1500-1504.
@article{215ac5818aec475d8f47c7dfeaddca25,
title = "The Extra Load Index as a method for comparing the relative economy of load carriage systems",
abstract = "The Extra Load Index (ELI) has been proposed as a suitable method of assessing the relative economy of load carriage systems. The purpose of this study was to determine, based on empirical evidence, that the ELI can accommodate variations in both body composition and added load. In total, 30 women walked carrying loads of up to 70{\%} body mass at self-selected walking speeds whilst expired air was collected. In addition, each of the women had body composition assessed via dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results show that the ELI is independent of body composition variables, the magnitude of additional loads and the speed of progression. Consequently, it is suggested that it represents an appropriate method of comparing load carriage systems in both scientific and commercial arenas. Statement of Relevance:This paper demonstrates that ELI is independent of body composition, added load and speed and is therefore an appropriate method to generalise comparisons of load carriage systems. It has the advantage of being easily understood by manufacturers and consumers whilst retaining appropriate scientific precision.",
author = "Ray Lloyd and Karen Hind and Bridget Parr and Simeon Davies and Carlton Cooke",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1080/00140139.2010.528454",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "1500--1504",
journal = "Ergonomics",
issn = "0014-0139",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "12",

}

The Extra Load Index as a method for comparing the relative economy of load carriage systems. / Lloyd, Ray; Hind, Karen; Parr, Bridget; Davies, Simeon; Cooke, Carlton.

In: Ergonomics, Vol. 53, No. 12, 12.2010, p. 1500-1504.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Extra Load Index as a method for comparing the relative economy of load carriage systems

AU - Lloyd, Ray

AU - Hind, Karen

AU - Parr, Bridget

AU - Davies, Simeon

AU - Cooke, Carlton

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - The Extra Load Index (ELI) has been proposed as a suitable method of assessing the relative economy of load carriage systems. The purpose of this study was to determine, based on empirical evidence, that the ELI can accommodate variations in both body composition and added load. In total, 30 women walked carrying loads of up to 70% body mass at self-selected walking speeds whilst expired air was collected. In addition, each of the women had body composition assessed via dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results show that the ELI is independent of body composition variables, the magnitude of additional loads and the speed of progression. Consequently, it is suggested that it represents an appropriate method of comparing load carriage systems in both scientific and commercial arenas. Statement of Relevance:This paper demonstrates that ELI is independent of body composition, added load and speed and is therefore an appropriate method to generalise comparisons of load carriage systems. It has the advantage of being easily understood by manufacturers and consumers whilst retaining appropriate scientific precision.

AB - The Extra Load Index (ELI) has been proposed as a suitable method of assessing the relative economy of load carriage systems. The purpose of this study was to determine, based on empirical evidence, that the ELI can accommodate variations in both body composition and added load. In total, 30 women walked carrying loads of up to 70% body mass at self-selected walking speeds whilst expired air was collected. In addition, each of the women had body composition assessed via dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results show that the ELI is independent of body composition variables, the magnitude of additional loads and the speed of progression. Consequently, it is suggested that it represents an appropriate method of comparing load carriage systems in both scientific and commercial arenas. Statement of Relevance:This paper demonstrates that ELI is independent of body composition, added load and speed and is therefore an appropriate method to generalise comparisons of load carriage systems. It has the advantage of being easily understood by manufacturers and consumers whilst retaining appropriate scientific precision.

U2 - 10.1080/00140139.2010.528454

DO - 10.1080/00140139.2010.528454

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 1500

EP - 1504

JO - Ergonomics

JF - Ergonomics

SN - 0014-0139

IS - 12

ER -