The ghost of Patrick Geddes: civics as applied sociology

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    16 Citations (Scopus)
    390 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In 1904 and 1905 Patrick Geddes (1905, 1906) read his famed, but today little-read, two-part paper, 'Civics: as Applied Sociology', to the first meetings of the British Sociological Society. Geddes is often thought of as a 'pioneer of sociology' (Mairet, 1957;Meller, 1990) and for some (egDevine, 1999: 296) as 'a seminal influence on sociology'. However, little of substance has been written to critically assess Geddes's intellectual legacy as a sociologist. His work is largely forgotten by sociologists in Britain (Abrams, 1968;Halliday, 1968;Evans, 1986). Few have been prepared to follow Geddes's ambition to bridge the chasm between nature and culture, environment and society, geography, biology and sociology. His conception of 'sociology', oriented towards social action from a standpoint explicitly informed by evolutionary theory. A re-appraisal of the contemporary relevance of Geddes's thinking on civics as applied sociology has to venture into the knotted problem of evolutionary sociology. It also requires giving some cogency to Geddes's often fragmentary and inconsistent mode of address. Although part of a post-positivist, 'larger modernism' Geddes remained mired in nineteenth century evolutionary thought and fought shy of dealing with larger issues of social class or the breakthrough work of early twentieth century sociology of Simmel, Weber and Durkheim. His apolitical notion of 'civics' limits its relevance to academic sociology today.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages14
    JournalSociological Research Online
    Volume10
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2005

    Keywords

    • Generalism
    • Patrick Geddes
    • History of sociology
    • Urban sociology
    • Civics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The ghost of Patrick Geddes: civics as applied sociology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this