The influence of gender roles on evolved partner preferences

Sheila J. Cunningham*, Phil A. Russell

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evolutionary psychologists argue that there are reliable sex differences between men and women's partner preferences, such that men attach greater importance than women to physical attractiveness, whereas women are more concerned than men with commitment and status. The present study proposed that gender roles may moderate these sex differences. A total of 143 participants completed the Bem Sex-Role Inventory and rated the importance of several partner characteristics. Categorical and regression analyses showed that both sex and sex-typing had a significant impact on partner preferences. These findings are discussed in terms of a trade-off threshold model of partner preferences, such that masculine women may engage in some trade-off of commitment characteristics for physical attractiveness and feminine men may trade-off attractiveness for signs of willingness to commit.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-150
Number of pages20
JournalSexualities, Evolution and Gender
Volume6
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

gender role
social attraction
Sex Characteristics
commitment
psychologist
Regression Analysis
Psychology
regression
Equipment and Supplies

Cite this

@article{66b8872255974a62a11de8ec0009d8fb,
title = "The influence of gender roles on evolved partner preferences",
abstract = "Evolutionary psychologists argue that there are reliable sex differences between men and women's partner preferences, such that men attach greater importance than women to physical attractiveness, whereas women are more concerned than men with commitment and status. The present study proposed that gender roles may moderate these sex differences. A total of 143 participants completed the Bem Sex-Role Inventory and rated the importance of several partner characteristics. Categorical and regression analyses showed that both sex and sex-typing had a significant impact on partner preferences. These findings are discussed in terms of a trade-off threshold model of partner preferences, such that masculine women may engage in some trade-off of commitment characteristics for physical attractiveness and feminine men may trade-off attractiveness for signs of willingness to commit.",
author = "Cunningham, {Sheila J.} and Russell, {Phil A.}",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1080/14616660412331332909",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "131--150",
journal = "Sexualities, Evolution and Gender",
issn = "1479-2508",
publisher = "Brunner - Routledge (US)",
number = "2-3",

}

The influence of gender roles on evolved partner preferences. / Cunningham, Sheila J.; Russell, Phil A.

In: Sexualities, Evolution and Gender, Vol. 6, No. 2-3, 2004, p. 131-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of gender roles on evolved partner preferences

AU - Cunningham, Sheila J.

AU - Russell, Phil A.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Evolutionary psychologists argue that there are reliable sex differences between men and women's partner preferences, such that men attach greater importance than women to physical attractiveness, whereas women are more concerned than men with commitment and status. The present study proposed that gender roles may moderate these sex differences. A total of 143 participants completed the Bem Sex-Role Inventory and rated the importance of several partner characteristics. Categorical and regression analyses showed that both sex and sex-typing had a significant impact on partner preferences. These findings are discussed in terms of a trade-off threshold model of partner preferences, such that masculine women may engage in some trade-off of commitment characteristics for physical attractiveness and feminine men may trade-off attractiveness for signs of willingness to commit.

AB - Evolutionary psychologists argue that there are reliable sex differences between men and women's partner preferences, such that men attach greater importance than women to physical attractiveness, whereas women are more concerned than men with commitment and status. The present study proposed that gender roles may moderate these sex differences. A total of 143 participants completed the Bem Sex-Role Inventory and rated the importance of several partner characteristics. Categorical and regression analyses showed that both sex and sex-typing had a significant impact on partner preferences. These findings are discussed in terms of a trade-off threshold model of partner preferences, such that masculine women may engage in some trade-off of commitment characteristics for physical attractiveness and feminine men may trade-off attractiveness for signs of willingness to commit.

U2 - 10.1080/14616660412331332909

DO - 10.1080/14616660412331332909

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 131

EP - 150

JO - Sexualities, Evolution and Gender

JF - Sexualities, Evolution and Gender

SN - 1479-2508

IS - 2-3

ER -