The language of western homogeneity: a rose by any other name is a potential lawsuit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It has sometimes been stated that international legislation favours the developed nations that create it to the detriment of the developing nations who must abide by it. This paper shall pose this question with regard to the issue of copyright law relating to the right to translate a literary work, as expressed in the Berne Convention and the TRIPS Agreement and applied in South Africa. In other words this paper shall ask: Does the right to make a translation of a literary work, as currently expressed in international instruments, work to the detriment of developing countries such as South Africa? The answer shall be a resounding ‘yes’. This is because, whilst developed countries are largely homogenous in culture and therefore language, developing countries have become cultural melting pots through centuries of migration and colonialization. The failure of such instruments to adequately cater for the developing world's cultural (and linguistic) diversity shows a failure on the part of the international community to take the developmental goals expressed within local and international legislation seriously. It shall be shown that current international law does have the scope for change in such instruments, but whether or not this change shall be utilized remains unknown.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)392–404
Number of pages13
JournalQueen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

lawsuit
language
legislation
developing country
international law
migration
linguistics
Law
homogeneity
community

Cite this

@article{dc3c797a5ffc4eb290041a0e770cd30f,
title = "The language of western homogeneity: a rose by any other name is a potential lawsuit",
abstract = "It has sometimes been stated that international legislation favours the developed nations that create it to the detriment of the developing nations who must abide by it. This paper shall pose this question with regard to the issue of copyright law relating to the right to translate a literary work, as expressed in the Berne Convention and the TRIPS Agreement and applied in South Africa. In other words this paper shall ask: Does the right to make a translation of a literary work, as currently expressed in international instruments, work to the detriment of developing countries such as South Africa? The answer shall be a resounding ‘yes’. This is because, whilst developed countries are largely homogenous in culture and therefore language, developing countries have become cultural melting pots through centuries of migration and colonialization. The failure of such instruments to adequately cater for the developing world's cultural (and linguistic) diversity shows a failure on the part of the international community to take the developmental goals expressed within local and international legislation seriously. It shall be shown that current international law does have the scope for change in such instruments, but whether or not this change shall be utilized remains unknown.",
author = "Jade Kouletakis",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4337/qmjip.2016.03.08",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "392–404",
journal = "Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property",
issn = "2045-9807",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

The language of western homogeneity : a rose by any other name is a potential lawsuit. / Kouletakis, Jade.

In: Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 6, No. 3, 01.07.2016, p. 392–404.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The language of western homogeneity

T2 - a rose by any other name is a potential lawsuit

AU - Kouletakis, Jade

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - It has sometimes been stated that international legislation favours the developed nations that create it to the detriment of the developing nations who must abide by it. This paper shall pose this question with regard to the issue of copyright law relating to the right to translate a literary work, as expressed in the Berne Convention and the TRIPS Agreement and applied in South Africa. In other words this paper shall ask: Does the right to make a translation of a literary work, as currently expressed in international instruments, work to the detriment of developing countries such as South Africa? The answer shall be a resounding ‘yes’. This is because, whilst developed countries are largely homogenous in culture and therefore language, developing countries have become cultural melting pots through centuries of migration and colonialization. The failure of such instruments to adequately cater for the developing world's cultural (and linguistic) diversity shows a failure on the part of the international community to take the developmental goals expressed within local and international legislation seriously. It shall be shown that current international law does have the scope for change in such instruments, but whether or not this change shall be utilized remains unknown.

AB - It has sometimes been stated that international legislation favours the developed nations that create it to the detriment of the developing nations who must abide by it. This paper shall pose this question with regard to the issue of copyright law relating to the right to translate a literary work, as expressed in the Berne Convention and the TRIPS Agreement and applied in South Africa. In other words this paper shall ask: Does the right to make a translation of a literary work, as currently expressed in international instruments, work to the detriment of developing countries such as South Africa? The answer shall be a resounding ‘yes’. This is because, whilst developed countries are largely homogenous in culture and therefore language, developing countries have become cultural melting pots through centuries of migration and colonialization. The failure of such instruments to adequately cater for the developing world's cultural (and linguistic) diversity shows a failure on the part of the international community to take the developmental goals expressed within local and international legislation seriously. It shall be shown that current international law does have the scope for change in such instruments, but whether or not this change shall be utilized remains unknown.

U2 - 10.4337/qmjip.2016.03.08

DO - 10.4337/qmjip.2016.03.08

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 392

EP - 404

JO - Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property

JF - Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property

SN - 2045-9807

IS - 3

ER -