Abstract
Social capital is a concept that is widely celebrated by the governing institutions of neo-liberal capitalism. Under the veneer of making social relations central to public discourse social capital obscures the extent to which social life is being made to submit to capital accumulation. First, we describe the hegemony of social capital as a veritable panacea for social de-composition from the political left in the work of Pierre Bourdieu to the middling conservatism of US thinkers such as Coleman and Putnam. In contrast, the original Marxist notion of social capital leads us to argue for abandoning the orthodox conception of social capital.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 127-143 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Critique |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2006 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Pierre Bourdieu
- Robert Putnam
- Karl Marx
- Neo-liberalism
- Social capital
- Social de-composition
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The maladies of social capital I: the missing 'capital' in theories of social capital'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver